Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   B767 300 pay (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/116207-b767-300-pay.html)

catIIIc 08-20-2018 01:09 PM
Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG (Post 2658576)
I have to ask, how do DAL and AA compare on the 767-300 to our rates. I don’t know but suspect there’s a similarity.

Lee
Yes our pay matches Dal/Aa in the 767-300.

baseball 08-20-2018 01:19 PM
I would like to know the history of it for history's sake.

BUT, here's the FRIGGIN DEAL!

It's a damn Widebody, doing a widebody mission!


Pay it at a wide body rate. So is the 400.

It's really pretty damn simple.

davessn763 08-20-2018 01:25 PM
Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG (Post 2658576)
I have to ask, how do DAL and AA compare on the 767-300 to our rates. I don’t know but suspect there’s a similarity.

Lee
Almost Exactly. It’s just as egregious at DAL and AMR(14%difference) as here. 6 seat difference between the 767-300 and 787-800 or a 2.7% difference in passengers carried for a a 20% difference in pay.

And don’t anyone go spouting off how much faster the 787-800 is or some decision 83 nonsense, the 78 is about 4% faster at max speed.

Anyway you cut it the 767-300 should pay much more compared to 757 or 737-800 than it does now, which is about 3.6%.

Galaxy5 08-20-2018 01:35 PM
Originally Posted by 757Driver (Post 2658588)
Or:

One legacy carrier paid it at the proper widebody rate pre-merger while the other did not. I'll let you fill in the blanks with that but as a hint, the proper paying carrier started with a "C" and ended with a "AL".
Historical perspective is good, but who gives a ***k about placing blame at this point? Water under the bridge, how about spending energy to fix it instead?

757Driver 08-20-2018 01:53 PM
Originally Posted by worstpilotever (Post 2658606)
China airlines?
Close but no cigar. :D

757Driver 08-20-2018 01:54 PM
Originally Posted by Galaxy5 (Post 2658629)
Historical perspective is good, but who gives a ***k about placing blame at this point? Water under the bridge, how about spending energy to fix it instead?
Agree completely but I wasn't the one who put up the first erroneous post. Was attempting to correct O2's attempt at rewriting history.

dmeg13021 08-20-2018 01:59 PM
Longevity pay. Done. Bid what you want, egos be damned.

Galaxy5 08-20-2018 02:04 PM
Originally Posted by 757Driver (Post 2658644)
Agree completely but I wasn't the one who put up the first erroneous post. Was attempting to correct O2's attempt at rewriting history.
Thanks, should have put my millennial skills to use to make multiple quotes. Not beat down by years of this yet, but still trying to look ahead knowing there will be a storm or 3 by the time I get to the end. Make hay while the sun shines and all that.

Short Bus Drive 08-20-2018 02:27 PM
Originally Posted by 757Driver (Post 2658588)
Or:

One legacy carrier paid it at the proper widebody rate pre-merger while the other did not. I'll let you fill in the blanks with that but as a hint, the proper paying carrier started with a "C" and ended with a "AL".
And one negotiator at that airline INSISTED on paying the way it is today.
He was very proud of it too. Initials J.B.

catIIIc 08-20-2018 02:55 PM
JB was not a negotiator but a Rep, but he did dig in like a pestulant child


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 PM.
Page 2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands