Search

Notices

NSNB. Perhaps??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2018 | 05:31 AM
  #21  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Any definite word on what simulators are going into the new sim building? If all of the bays are spoken for and there's no room for an NSNB, I think that answers the question short term on whether or not the company will buy NSNBs.
There are 2 787 sims and 3 MAX sim for sure. With all the 319s we are taking over the next couple years I wouldn’t be surprised to se a 320 sim put in there. A new 777-300 sim is being installed where the 747 sim was. You also have to take into account all the 757 and 767-300 sims that we have that will be eventually replaced over the next few years. I think that is 5 bays not including the 2 767-400 sims

So the G building will have 3 open bays and 1 open FTD bay for now.

Last edited by MasterOfPuppets; 11-11-2018 at 05:44 AM.
Reply
Old 11-11-2018 | 05:55 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Any definite word on what simulators are going into the new sim building? If all of the bays are spoken for and there's no room for an NSNB, I think that answers the question short term on whether or not the company will buy NSNBs.
So far the only “official” word is 3 737 max sims. I don’t think Realistate is a limiting factor at the FTC.
Reply
Old 11-11-2018 | 06:09 AM
  #23  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by STXDrew
So far the only “official” word is 3 737 max sims. I don’t think Realistate is a limiting factor at the FTC.
along with 2 787 sims.....
Reply
Old 01-24-2019 | 08:46 AM
  #24  
RJDio's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 8
From: CRJ FO
Default

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...g-smaller-jets

Yet we dither.
Reply
Old 01-25-2019 | 05:08 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
You may be onto something. Our new uniforms, especially the cabin crew look like they belong at a ULCC rather than a legacy catering to the business traveler. My guess is that we start chasing Spirit’s tail instead of Delta. The production line isn’t backed up enough for us to place our initial order. Give it a few years.
Reply
Old 01-25-2019 | 10:11 AM
  #26  
ChalupaBatman's Avatar
ORD Prisoner
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio


With the touted efficiency of the A220-300, I could see Spirit cramming 160 seats into that thing. It has trans-con range, and could blow the doors off of currently unprofitable routes using the A319s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-25-2019 | 11:07 AM
  #27  
blizzue's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: A-320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by ChalupaBatman
With the touted efficiency of the A220-300, I could see Spirit cramming 160 seats into that thing. It has trans-con range, and could blow the doors off of currently unprofitable routes using the A319s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve heard the A220 only gets the amazing fuel economy airbus promised by flying it at .74 and low 30s.
Reply
Old 01-25-2019 | 11:13 AM
  #28  
ChalupaBatman's Avatar
ORD Prisoner
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by blizzue
I’ve heard the A220 only gets the amazing fuel economy airbus promised by flying it at .74 and low 30s.


Seriously? Is there anything you can link to? I’ve been a fan of the C-Series program for 9 years. Anything the break up the Airbus/Boeing duopoly. If what you’re saying is accurate, well then it’s a real shame. I had high hopes for this bird.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 01-25-2019 | 11:27 AM
  #29  
RJDio's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 8
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by blizzue
I’ve heard the A220 only gets the amazing fuel economy airbus promised by flying it at .74 and low 30s.
That’s a similar profile , and slower, the RJ’s are flown at (at least at Skywest).
Reply
Old 01-25-2019 | 04:10 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Default

I wonder how the E190/195 E2 compares to the A220. 2x2 seating on the Embraer is nice and a common type could allow us to operate everything from the 175 and up. I’d love to be wrong, but I still think that we will never fly 76 seaters at mainline, but buying efficient 100-120 seat planes to replace or add to the aging 737-700/319 fleet could happen eventually.

Last edited by Itsajob; 01-25-2019 at 04:26 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLazarus
United
810
04-04-2020 06:58 PM
friend
United
160
08-27-2018 07:47 PM
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Dave Fitzgerald
United
304
01-23-2016 05:04 AM
worstpilotever
United
163
01-05-2016 11:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices