Search
Notices

Media leakers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2019, 01:40 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
No you didn't.
So was it just a little sissy boy, slap fight then? No eye gouging or broken jaws or anything?
Airhoss is offline  
Old 01-18-2019, 02:38 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,187
Default

Originally Posted by Setopbug View Post
Who cares? I moved up two numbers!
You moved up one number.
Grumble is offline  
Old 01-18-2019, 04:59 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Geezus, do we work for a Legacy Airline or the Jerry Springer Show???
DashTrash is offline  
Old 01-18-2019, 05:44 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
So was it just a little sissy boy, slap fight then? No eye gouging or broken jaws or anything?
I wasn’t there, but info I got says one left in paddy wagon, the other in a meat wagon.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 02:06 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
I wasn’t there, but info I got says one left in paddy wagon, the other in a meat wagon.
I heard the scab won.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 03:11 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Default

Neither one of you are correct..


Try again.
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 03:19 PM
  #47  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
Neither one of you are correct..





Try again.


Explain! What the union doing about it?
M5000 is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 03:31 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slats Extend's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 393
Default

The union is representing both pilots in the disciplinary process as they are required to do.

As far as the actual details, it would be asinine for someone who actually knows them to put them on the forum before the disciplinary process runs its course.

So far, we just have numbskulls that are acting like they know what happened.. They don’t.
Slats Extend is offline  
Old 01-25-2019, 04:22 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Default

Originally Posted by Slats Extend View Post
The union is representing both pilots in the disciplinary process as they are required to do.

As far as the actual details, it would be asinine for someone who actually knows them to put them on the forum before the disciplinary process runs its course.

So far, we just have numbskulls that are acting like they know what happened.. They don’t.
I’m sorry I didn’t catch just how you seem to be privy to the exact details of this case. Are you actively enovled or are you just relaying second hand information?
SUX4U is offline  
Old 01-25-2019, 05:47 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,005
Default

Originally Posted by PDRit View Post
Pilots alone won’t save the day. But pilots along with FA’s and CS will. I think those posters were put in all the employee areas. It was only the ones in flight ops that got leaked. So are the other employee groups smarter or better trained at compliance? I think way too many pilots believe they don’t have to abide by any company regulations. Ever hear guys bragging about how they don’t have to comply with company meal expense rules? The idea that they are untouchable leads to BS like this posting of sensitive info because they don’t believe the disclaimers/rules apply to them. They all believe they can’t be fired and if they are ALPA will save them so they operate in their own world of disillusionment.
Tap the brakes PDR. As far as meals go, we are governed by the reasonableness standard of the UPA, not corporate expense rules. So your analogy is nonsense. There are many corporate policies that don’t apply. Don’t believe that? Just read any corporate comm that comes out system wide, and if it’s a new policy, there’s always a disclaimer at the end that says “in the event the corporate policy differs from the UPA, the UPA is controlling.” Now if somebody is loudly boasting about it in front of others, it’s surely in poor taste, but it doesn’t make them the “rule breaker” that you're trying to paint them as.
Guppydriver95 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HwkrPlt
Major
177
04-01-2018 06:32 PM
coorsFlight
Major
11
12-08-2016 06:56 AM
newKnow
Delta
73
08-03-2015 12:16 PM
aerospacepilot
Major
52
02-06-2015 01:22 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices