Search
Notices

Crj 550

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2019, 11:31 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RJDio's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 648
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves View Post
Mgt. at LCAL used to say that most of the profits came from 10% of the passengers. The 20 seats that are being taken out were probably gonna be sold on Priceline for a pittance anyway.
Was that pre-free domestic upgrades?
RJDio is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 11:32 AM
  #42  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Photoflier View Post
What’s wrong with SE taxiing?

Nothing. What's the point of saving money and potentially making pax uncomfortable if that money we save is wasted on things like this?
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 11:32 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by Ni hao View Post
Oscar to Kirby: Dude how you going to get around scope!
Bahahahahaha you win the interwebs today
spaaks is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 11:44 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio View Post
Keenly aware. So you eliminate 20 total seats and in the process add 4 premium seats. So now you make an inefficient airplane even more so (CASM).

How many of those extra 4 premium seats will be free upgrades? Only management will know the true gains (monetarily) or lack there of in the end.

Another factor in the revenue equation comes into play when a passenger buys a first class ticket on an RJ that connects to a mainline flight. How do you assign revenue for two flights on one ticket price? It would be easy to show that RJ as a huge money maker.
Floyd is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 11:50 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
It's a new airplane with, I assume a de-rated 700 engine, that might cushion the blow.
Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
It's still a new plane from the factory, with a reduced weight certification.

Also, in the Bombardier press release, it says Delta is a customer as well???
Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
https://www.bombardier.com/en/media/...ardiercom.html


Bombardier just added them as new aircraft to the order book.
I've got some oceanfront property in Nebraska with your name on it! If you think Bombardier can certify, build, and deliver 25 brand new CR7's by the end of 2019.........


https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300790427.html
The new ten-year agreement between GoJet and United will go into effect with the introduction of the first CRJ550, with planned entry into service by the summer of 2019. The current target is to have 25 in service by year end and all 50 aircraft in service by summer of 2020.
spaaks is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 11:58 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
spaaks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by Bluewaffle View Post
Also taking economy seats out of the 319 and 320 and replacing them with premium seats. Here’s your SMNB. Clever way around current scope language, I’d say.
Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
I'd love to see the CASM for these things.
Originally Posted by N6279P View Post
More premium seats attract more money. Do you know much about revenue management?
Originally Posted by viperhawgdriver View Post
It’ll be mostly free upgrades anyway. Doubt it’s an undiscovered revenue source that only Kirby thought of. Face it, he’s desperate and this is the only move he’s got.
Originally Posted by RJDio View Post
Keenly aware. So you eliminate 20 total seats and in the process add 4 premium seats. So now you make an inefficient airplane even more so (CASM).

How many of those extra 4 premium seats will be free upgrades? Only management will know the true gains (monetarily) or lack there of in the end.

I don't think they're going to be using these airframes on ORD-GRR. They're going to use them on business heavy markets where people (companies) actually pay up for a premium seat. Don't forget, it's not just the CRJ550. United is making a system wide push to add more premium seats. They're reducing seat counts/increasing premium seating on767-300's and ALL 319/320's

https://thepointsguy.com/news/united-crj550/

So far, the airline only confirmed that it’ll fly between Chicago (ORD) and Walmart’s headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas (XNA). United is apparently losing out on business from Walmart employees and suppliers looking to fly in premium cabins — with more first-class seats on the way, XNA flyers will have an easier time booking premium-cabin United travel between Arkansas and Asia.
spaaks is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 12:01 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RJDio's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 648
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd View Post
Another factor in the revenue equation comes into play when a passenger buys a first class ticket on an RJ that connects to a mainline flight. How do you assign revenue for two flights on one ticket price? It would be easy to show that RJ as a huge money maker.
Hence my second point. Only management will truly know the success of this endeavor. The numbers can be easily manipulated to show whatever they desire in terms or revenue.

Funny how you don’t see a bunch of start ups flying rj’s everyday. Let alone in this configuration.
RJDio is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 12:06 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by RoyerYetlink View Post
Get rid of one FA and pass the savings onto the pax!!
awax is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 12:23 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL View Post
My point was that mgt wants us to scrimp and save and then goes out and makes a decision which wastes far more money in order to end-run someting in our contract.
Breath new life into a legal airframe that connects premium passengers into a growing international market AND decreases capacity? Sounds like a win to me. I'm not sure how this is any way an end around as based on the news, it doesn't seem to violate scope.

UAL, instead of spending billions on new fleets for mainline, can feed the network with high yield passengers. I'd like to hear how this option is more expensive than the fly and buy mainline RJs.

If you ask me, if we're going to buy airplanes, make the high paying ones - which by the way we are.

Originally Posted by sleeves View Post
Mgt. at LCAL used to say that most of the profits came from 10% of the passengers. The 20 seats that are being taken out were probably gonna be sold on Priceline for a pittance anyway.
This guys does a pretty good job explaining premium yield.

awax is offline  
Old 02-06-2019, 12:28 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio View Post
Hence my second point. Only management will truly know the success of this endeavor. The numbers can be easily manipulated to show whatever they desire in terms or revenue.

Funny how you don’t see a bunch of start ups flying rj’s everyday. Let alone in this configuration.
Point to point, it wouldn't make sense, but if you're chasing high yield business who is willing to pay for access to a global network, this seems to be the price of admission.
awax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM1337
Regional
14
09-03-2015 11:19 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
1
01-31-2013 07:07 AM
Tuckster
Flight Schools and Training
6
06-29-2008 07:22 AM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM
JAGflyer
Regional
11
09-07-2007 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices