Search

Notices

Crj 550

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2019 | 12:43 PM
  #51  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by spaaks
I've got some oceanfront property in Nebraska with your name on it! If you think Bombardier can certify, build, and deliver 25 brand new CR7's by the end of 2019.........


https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300790427.html
The new ten-year agreement between GoJet and United will go into effect with the introduction of the first CRJ550, with planned entry into service by the summer of 2019. The current target is to have 25 in service by year end and all 50 aircraft in service by summer of 2020.
It's possible, they were able to start getting Skywest's 900SCs out the door in a few months. The 550 is just an STC 700.
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 01:06 PM
  #52  
RJDio's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 8
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by awax
Point to point, it wouldn't make sense, but if you're chasing high yield business who is willing to pay for access to a global network, this seems to be the price of admission.
I think the heartburn from this is the company’s willingness to invest in an outsourced product, while having a viable (according to the union) alternative in-house.

While we may be far removed from the toxic environment of the Tilton era, this announcement is a sobering one, remind us we are far from strategic harmony with management. They are/will continue to treat this relationship like Hyman Roth. And so should we.
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 01:21 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 558
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL
Nothing. What's the point of saving money and potentially making pax uncomfortable if that money we save is wasted on things like this?

One pack on the APU and one on an engine cools fine.
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 01:28 PM
  #54  
awax's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
I think the heartburn from this is the company’s willingness to invest in an outsourced product, while having a viable (according to the union) alternative in-house.

While we may be far removed from the toxic environment of the Tilton era, this announcement is a sobering one, remind us we are far from strategic harmony with management. They are/will continue to treat this relationship like Hyman Roth. And so should we.
I hear ya, I'm the last fan of the RJ product but I never expected mainline pilots holding firm on scope in this contract would equal the death of outsourced RJ flying entirely. The company has had the option to invest small narrow body aircraft since 2012 with mainline pilot flying them and for whatever reason they've decided not to.

Pulling 20 seats out of a jet doesn't make sense on the surface, but if the payoff is higher yield across the network, at a lower cost, and in compliance with the CBA I'm OK with it. I'd rather see new aircraft pay at wide body rates, not RJ rates.
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 02:17 PM
  #55  
Fr8Thrust's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Default

If only they gave the flying to a reputable operator.
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 02:36 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher
One pack on the APU and one on an engine cools fine.
Exactly. On the 737 on hot days, single engine taxi actual cools the cabin better than running both (if you are running both packs off of the engines). Why? We use #2 (the right) engine for single engine movement. It is normally operating at a slightly higher RPM (read, more pneumatic pressure feeding the pack) and the left pack is getting constant high pressure from the APU. EWR 4R departure last Summer. I’m DH in row 21. Captain taxis out on number 2. Cool cabin and nice smooth taxi. Starts number 1 while still number 8 or something. Cabin begins to warm up by the time we are next for departure as both engines at idle (lower pneumatic output). Wish he had waited a tad longer (for comfort reasons). Max taxis easy on 1 engine. In fact, easiest way to operate from our busy hubs is crank 2 ASAP. Run after start and get taxi clearance. Start moving and clear the alley for others then have the option to start the left immediately upon taxi or, if conditions permit; hold off until you see fit
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 02:52 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

The point of E175s is the higher yielding passengers from smaller destinations. If anyone doubted this before, here’s your proof.

The CRJ550 takes care of the premium pax while leaving a few low yielding passengers behind. Not ideal, but it is a workaround scope.

If this is successful it’ll render scope nearly useless. Given the higher costs I’d expect limited use/success of these aircraft. However it is a threat and it will reduce bargaining power re:scope clause. Relief still won’t happen, but it’s gonna make bringing 175s in-house more difficult for ALPA.
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 02:53 PM
  #58  
Pilot Response
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher
One pack on the APU and one on an engine cools fine.

Swing and a miss
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 03:05 PM
  #59  
Pilot Response
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by IAHB756
Exactly. On the 737 on hot days, single engine taxi actual cools the cabin better than running both (if you are running both packs off of the engines). Why? We use #2 (the right) engine for single engine movement. It is normally operating at a slightly higher RPM (read, more pneumatic pressure feeding the pack) and the left pack is getting constant high pressure from the APU. EWR 4R departure last Summer. I’m DH in row 21. Captain taxis out on number 2. Cool cabin and nice smooth taxi. Starts number 1 while still number 8 or something. Cabin begins to warm up by the time we are next for departure as both engines at idle (lower pneumatic output). Wish he had waited a tad longer (for comfort reasons). Max taxis easy on 1 engine. In fact, easiest way to operate from our busy hubs is crank 2 ASAP. Run after start and get taxi clearance. Start moving and clear the alley for others then have the option to start the left immediately upon taxi or, if conditions permit; hold off until you see fit
True enough. I haven't flown the Guppy since 2006, but WHY ???
Reply
Old 02-06-2019 | 03:07 PM
  #60  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by awax
I hear ya, I'm the last fan of the RJ product but I never expected mainline pilots holding firm on scope in this contract would equal the death of outsourced RJ flying entirely. The company has had the option to invest small narrow body aircraft since 2012 with mainline pilot flying them and for whatever reason they've decided not to.

Pulling 20 seats out of a jet doesn't make sense on the surface, but if the payoff is higher yield across the network, at a lower cost, and in compliance with the CBA I'm OK with it. I'd rather see new aircraft pay at wide body rates, not RJ rates.
Replacing the god-awful CRJ200 and ERJ145 with these makes good sense, 10FC, 20+ and 20 economy.

Seat map
https://hub.united.com/united-more-p...628095340.html
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRM1337
Regional
14
09-03-2015 11:19 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
1
01-31-2013 07:07 AM
Tuckster
Flight Schools and Training
6
06-29-2008 07:22 AM
saab2000
Regional
46
11-27-2007 02:35 PM
JAGflyer
Regional
11
09-07-2007 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices