Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Let the Bump Games Begin 19-11D (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/123747-let-bump-games-begin-19-11d.html)

Chuck D 08-29-2019 11:21 AM

I think it’s more of a loophole issue - I.e. could not have held ORD except via “backdoor” EWR bid and luck/timing w/ the trade. Can be annoying for more Sr ORD FOs who would have loved that same spot but on the whole I think it’s better to have base trading than kill it.


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 2878800)
I’m calling BS.

1. Any pilot with a proposed base trade request Is at risk of a more senior pilot “taking” the trade in his stead...in order to respect seniority.

2. Every senior pilot HAD the opportunity to take that bid, those in the same category HAD the opportunity to take the base trade.

So how did this not honor seniority?


Bhramafear 08-29-2019 11:26 AM


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 2878800)
I’m calling BS.

1. Any pilot with a proposed base trade request Is at risk of a more senior pilot “taking” the trade in his stead...in order to respect seniority.

2. Every senior pilot HAD the opportunity to take that bid, those in the same category HAD the opportunity to take the base trade.

So how did this not honor seniority?

Every senior pilot on the left seat of the bus.

Itsajob 08-29-2019 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 2878800)
I’m calling BS.

1. Any pilot with a proposed base trade request Is at risk of a more senior pilot “taking” the trade in his stead...in order to respect seniority.

2. Every senior pilot HAD the opportunity to take that bid, those in the same category HAD the opportunity to take the base trade.

So how did this not honor seniority?

They will argue that a base trade doesn’t follow seniority because a more senior pilot on another piece of equipment has to wait for a vacancy bid. This guy probably wouldn’t have made the cut under a vacancy, but this is allowed in the contract, and seniority was followed under this section. I have no problem with pilots exercising this section of the contract for their benefit any more than those who are senior enough to make a killing on premium pay trips.

Bhramafear 08-29-2019 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by Chuck D (Post 2878813)
I think it’s more of a loophole issue - I.e. could not have held ORD except via “backdoor” EWR bid and luck/timing w/ the trade. Can be annoying for more Sr ORD FOs who would have loved that same spot but on the whole I think it’s better to have base trading than kill it.

I think base trading is a good thing. It does not truly honor seniority. Neither does seat locks as pointed out above.

jumppilot 08-29-2019 12:01 PM

Company would love for base trades to not count as the junior man.

What we have is valuable to the company and to us.

Because of that EWR- ORD base trade almost every pilot displaced can displace to higher paying Airbus CA. That’s a win.

Bhramafear 08-29-2019 12:19 PM


Originally Posted by jumppilot (Post 2878842)
Company would love for base trades to not count as the junior man.

What we have is valuable to the company and to us.

Because of that EWR- ORD base trade almost every pilot displaced can displace to higher paying Airbus CA. That’s a win.

That’s where I’m a little conflicted. There are almost 30 folks who could be awarded Captain because of the base trade. Being displaced sucks and I’m glad they have the opportunity to do that. However if I’m a senior bus FO in ORD who has been waiting for a vacancy bid it’s gonna be a while...

Grumble 08-29-2019 02:15 PM


Originally Posted by Bhramafear (Post 2878855)
That’s where I’m a little conflicted. There are almost 30 folks who could be awarded Captain because of the base trade. Being displaced sucks and I’m glad they have the opportunity to do that. However if I’m a senior bus FO in ORD who has been waiting for a vacancy bid it’s gonna be a while...

You could've taken the bid to CA320EWR too, and rolled the dice on a base trade. You didn't, he did. Absolutely nothing prevented you from trying but you want the sure thing. That's your problem.

To be clear, "you" in this is whatever FO is *****ing about this cats contract ninja skills. Not you personally.

Bhramafear 08-29-2019 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2878914)
You could've taken the bid to CA320EWR too, and rolled the dice on a base trade. You didn't, he did. Absolutely nothing prevented you from trying but you want the sure thing. That's your problem.

To be clear, "you" in this is whatever FO is *****ing about this cats contract ninja skills. Not you personally.

Yes but you shouldn’t have to take that risk to rightfully exercise your seniority. Again I like base trades as a whole but this is a problem for folks who want a vacancy award in the bus in ORD. Also I’m super junior, so I’m not some senior guy moaning about how bad life is. I agree that this guy hit the jackpot. Just hope they live in base. Gonna be a looong wait for a line...

Thor 08-29-2019 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by Grumble (Post 2878914)
You could've taken the bid to CA320EWR too, and rolled the dice on a base trade. You didn't, he did. Absolutely nothing prevented you from trying but you want the sure thing. That's your problem.

This is my point exactly, the opportunity was there for all pilots, in seniority order. They chose not to pursue a provision that’s clearly defined in the contract. In fact, the company recently made base trades “electronic” to provide greater transparency into the process.

A base trade is not a vacancy bid, true. But it is a provision in the CBA that is applied in seniority order.

As an aside, I suspect this will be the same pro/con logic to expect if the subject of satellite bases is ever seriously considered.

Bhramafear 08-29-2019 03:56 PM


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 2878950)
This is my point exactly, the opportunity was there for all pilots, in seniority order. They chose not to pursue a provision that’s clearly defined in the contract. In fact, the company recently made base trades “electronic” to provide greater transparency into the process.

A base trade is not a vacancy bid, true. But it is a provision in the CBA that is applied in seniority order.

As an aside, I suspect this will be the same pro/con logic to expect if the subject of satellite bases is ever seriously considered.

The contract does not always follow pure seniority. I never said it wasn’t allowed by contract. Just that from a pure seniority standpoint it doesn’t pass the sniff test.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands