Originally Posted by BenTover (Post 3147189)

Any idea how much more it cost United vs a straight furlough? Does it cost United $1000 more or $1B more? Both cost the company more. No one seems to know. In fact, no one seems able to place a value on anything in this agreement.

Originally Posted by TFAYD (Post 3147201)

does it really matter? Is this only a good thing if it costs a lot?

the key point is that they get some option value and are willing to put some $ down for it.

Originally Posted by BenTover (Post 3147189)

Any idea how much more it cost United vs a straight furlough? Does it cost United $1000 more or $1B more? Both cost the company more. No one seems to know. In fact, no one seems able to place a value on anything in this agreement.

Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 3147223)

it saved 3900 jobs
the rest is irrelevant
and I am not one of the 3900


so let move on and see where it takes us
and yes the TA sucked

Originally Posted by BenTover (Post 3147226)

The rest is irrelevant? Spoken like a management wet dream. I cannot wait ‘til next June.

Originally Posted by BenTover (Post 3147226)

The rest is irrelevant? Spoken like a management wet dream. I cannot wait ‘til next June.

Originally Posted by Nucflash (Post 3147247)

He would rather see a furlough in June to prove he was right than have things improve. Guys like him have mentally gone off the rails.....and there are more than a few of them out there. Look out for yourselves at work.

Originally Posted by Sniper66 (Post 3147242)

not management
but you can keep dwelling and pound your chest about all these
i decided to move on
don’t lose your medical because it’s still 96k

Originally Posted by BenTover (Post 3147250)

Either you guys are management plants or this union has an open wallet to the company.

Originally Posted by BenTover (Post 3147254)

Pounding chest? That’s cute. I’m not the one making whacked out comments like the cost of an agreement is irrelevant.