![]() |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3149795)
Until domestic and international COVID restrictions are lifted, there really won’t be very much demand. When they do come down there will most likely be a fare war while airlines compete to recover, maintain, or gain market share. Loads may improve, but revenue will lag behind for quite a while. The demand may be there to fill the seats and keep our jobs, but the revenue will be less and making improvements coming out of this will be slow. I’m settling in for another lost decade.
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 3150406)
Once the crap shoots out the leg holes of juniors diaper, there's no putting it back.
|
Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
(Post 3150618)
And then kirby asked the judge to make these cuts permanent.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3150630)
what cuts? The TA doesn’t exist the day we declare bankruptcy.
|
Originally Posted by Nucflash
(Post 3150665)
You can smash their craniums against a wall ‘till kingdom come.....it’s not going to break any functioning neurons loose.
|
Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
(Post 3150618)
And then kirby asked the judge to make these cuts permanent.
|
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3151258)
If that’s all that happens in BK, I say that’s very optimistic. The judge making this LOA permanent would be just fine IMO, compared to some other creative deep cuts that he could impose. I hope you are correct.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules. This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 3151271)
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules. This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 3151271)
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules. This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:39 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands