![]() |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3151290)
exactly.....what airline wants a bunch of unproductive pilots? They would rather a BK judge force us to 90hrs a month.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3151306)
90 hours a month with a 50% pay cut. That how that works.
|
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 3151271)
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules. This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK. That video certainly did not make me feel very good, however. |
Originally Posted by SystemB
(Post 3151840)
That’s correct. Which is another reason this LOA is unlikely to affect any potential BK outcome. Unfortunately no one can know for certain what would happen. Hopefully we’ll never have to find out.
That video certainly did not make me feel very good, however. on that note - what happened to the video. It shows as a broken link on the ALPA site. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:53 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands