Hunter Keay
10-27-2020 | 10:08 AM
#43
Orbis Non Sufficit
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
10-28-2020 | 10:07 AM
#45
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
If that’s all that happens in BK, I say that’s very optimistic. The judge making this LOA permanent would be just fine IMO, compared to some other creative deep cuts that he could impose. I hope you are correct.
10-28-2020 | 10:32 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
10-28-2020 | 10:39 AM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 116
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
10-28-2020 | 10:52 AM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
10-28-2020 | 11:16 AM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
10-28-2020 | 05:46 PM
#50
Banned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
90 hr line, 50% pay cut, and NO pay protection. The company wants that low MPG, like the 65 hrs we had in bankruptcy. When trips and turns fall off your schedule throughout the month you’ll have a long way to fall before you hit the minimum. Think “we only want to pay what you actually fly”.
Last edited by TodKindrsChikun; 10-28-2020 at 05:57 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
