Hunter Keay
10-27-2020, 10:08 AM
#43
Orbis Non Sufficit
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
what cuts? The TA doesn’t exist the day we declare bankruptcy.
10-28-2020, 10:07 AM
#45
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
And then kirby asked the judge to make these cuts permanent.
10-28-2020, 10:32 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Originally Posted by SystemB
If that’s all that happens in BK, I say that’s very optimistic. The judge making this LOA permanent would be just fine IMO, compared to some other creative deep cuts that he could impose. I hope you are correct.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
10-28-2020, 10:39 AM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
10-28-2020, 10:52 AM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
The problem is, UAL also would not want this LOA permanent in the event of a BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
Yes, they would want deep cuts but pretty much the opposite of this LOA. Instead, they would desire very high LPAs (to enable maximum furloughs) combined with huge cuts to pay and work rules.
This LOA is designed to retain pilots for a rebound, not minimize labor expenses for an airline shrinking in BK.
10-28-2020, 11:16 AM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
exactly.....what airline wants a bunch of unproductive pilots? They would rather a BK judge force us to 90hrs a month.
10-28-2020, 05:46 PM
#50
Banned
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 345
Originally Posted by Airhoss
90 hours a month with a 50% pay cut. That how that works.
Last edited by TodKindrsChikun; 10-28-2020 at 05:57 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
