![]() |
Originally Posted by GoCats67
(Post 3320086)
This one should be interesting, but I don't think it will be too crazy. The next one (more narrowbody focused) will be down right ridiculous.
|
Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
(Post 3320331)
Anyone know why the snapshot would show unfilled CA vacancies? I’m sure there are sufficient bids to fill those vacancies.
|
Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
(Post 3320331)
Anyone know why the snapshot would show unfilled CA vacancies? I’m sure there are sufficient bids to fill those vacancies.
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3320346)
because there are insufficient bids to fill those vacancies
There was a reason behind the question. |
Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
(Post 3320348)
Not so. I know factually someone who bid for one of those vacancies and didn’t get it in the snapshot, but was conceptually “awarded” something lower on their bid list.
There was a reason behind the question. |
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3320359)
Is the system smart enough to preclude people from being awarded a CA bid without 1000 hours? Not sure if that applies to your example.
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3320359)
Is the system smart enough to preclude people from being awarded a CA bid without 1000 hours? Not sure if that applies to your example.
|
Originally Posted by flynd94
(Post 3320360)
Why the system is smart enough
Not sure I understand what you’re saying here. |
Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
(Post 3320361)
Not applicable, as they had long ago completed the self-certify entry.
|
Originally Posted by Aldo Raine
(Post 3320361)
Not applicable, as they had long ago completed the self-certify entry.
Might still want to have your friend ask the question to crew resources if they are a sub-1k UAL FO. Given that this scenario hasn’t happened in decades, I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s only assessing their UAL time (if it even does a check of that) :confused: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands