Search

Notices

Tumi 4.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2023 | 06:16 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DownSideUp
They say life is all about perspective. Man, they weren’t kidding.

Where you all see DEC as a bad thing, I would have given my left nut for the opportunity. I had to wait 20 years.

Where you see reserve rules as being onerous or untenable, I see a job that pays you a massive salary to simply be on call (and, god forbid, have to actually work).

Don’t get me started on the other items.

Solid yes vote on this one.

And I say it again, perspective.
You missed the entire argument. I never stated being a captain at United isn't a great and prestigious position. My point was that by allowing the company to use DECs we have taken away any motivation to increase QOL and compensation, the same thing that has been happening at the regionals for years.

For reserve rules, I said we have made decent progress. My gripe is they will not be fully implemented until a year from now.

As for the rest of my points on sick leave, LTD, coverage pool, and working on days off, I suppose these are all concessions people are willing to live with for the right price.
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 06:17 PM
  #12  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by PipeMan
Same thinking here, strong NO vote.

Like I said, the Eye of the Tiger just isn’t here right now. We’re not hungry enough for it.

Anyone have the Tiger’s Eye I’m talking about? Anybody?
nah….more like “Tiger blood”….and we all know where that ended up.

#winning
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 06:30 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Default

I don’t like forced upgrades but we need to stop misrepresenting what the proposed contractual language allows. It is NOT direct entry captains.

Being forced to upgrade after 350 hrs as an FO plus 100hrs of OE plus otherwise meeting the FAA regulatory mins for upgrade is what the proposed language allows.

It sucks, it really sucks, but it’s not direct entry captains.

A NB FO who plays their cards a certain way may take a year+ to get to 350 hours.
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 06:37 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by three1five
I don’t like forced upgrades but we need to stop misrepresenting what the proposed contractual language allows. It is NOT direct entry captains.

Being forced to upgrade after 350 hrs as an FO plus 100hrs of OE plus otherwise meeting the FAA regulatory mins for upgrade is what the proposed language allows.

It sucks, it really sucks, but it’s not direct entry captains.

A NB FO who plays their cards a certain way may take a year+ to get to 350 hours.
Direct-ish Entry Captains. Forced Upgrades.

Better?

To reiterate, my post is about how this removes any motivation to increase pay or QOL for NB CAs. The only reason regionals are now seeing massive pay and QOL increases is because they physically don't have enough pilots to force upgrade.
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 06:48 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
From: Upside Down
Default

Originally Posted by dailyops
You missed the entire argument. I never stated being a captain at United isn't a great and prestigious position. My point was that by allowing the company to use DECs we have taken away any motivation to increase QOL and compensation, the same thing that has been happening at the regionals for years.

For reserve rules, I said we have made decent progress. My gripe is they will not be fully implemented until a year from now.

As for the rest of my points on sick leave, LTD, coverage pool, and working on days off, I suppose these are all concessions people are willing to live with for the right price.
I’ll say it again, perspective.

Have you ever worked a true “9-5” job that paid less than $100k? Talk about QOL and compensation? You need to realize that there is simply not another job in the world that pays you +$250k a year to work half the month and literally have no other responsibilities outside of that.

Perspective. 10 months to implementation? Wow, 10 months? Do you realize how fast 10 months goes by? I walked the neighborhood with my kids on Halloween 10 months ago and it seems like yesterday.

You’re grasping at straws to make the argument that this deal is worthy of being shot down. Is it perfect? No. But no contract is. Is it a good deal? A resounding Yes.

By the way, I’m still waiting for my pony. 🤣
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 07:02 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 6
Default

All the yellow lanyards and blue Kool-aid bag tags in company colors didn't get us much past a mediated agreement at another airline. Hopefully when Ual-alpa turns 100 on the next contract we're not using PDR data as polling data again.
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 07:18 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

78% yes
22% no

Everything else is just could would should
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 08:02 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by three1five
A NB FO who plays their cards a certain way may take a year+ to get to 350 hours.
But then that NBFO is just seat locked for 3 years+ total, because they start a new 25 month seat lock clock when pilots in this "accelerated" program are ready for their forced upgrade. I'm failing to see how playing their cards to drag out upgrade does much for them, given that.
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 85
Default

Originally Posted by Fyziksisphun
But then that NBFO is just seat locked for 3 years+ total, because they start a new 25 month seat lock clock when pilots in this "accelerated" program are ready for their forced upgrade. I'm failing to see how playing their cards to drag out upgrade does much for them, given that.
It provides enough time for those who want it…to take it from him. Do you honestly think EVERY new hire is going to recoil in horror at the idea of upgrading ASAP? It’s the senior FOs on the WB who balk at working for money….not the new hires.
Reply
Old 09-04-2023 | 10:39 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 660
Likes: 45
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
It provides enough time for those who want it…to take it from him. Do you honestly think EVERY new hire is going to recoil in horror at the idea of upgrading ASAP? It’s the senior FOs on the WB who balk at working for money….not the new hires.
The point is about safety and whether an 8-ball new hire is ready for it that soon, not whether they feel like working hard.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BobbyLeeSwagger
United
258
03-05-2023 05:50 PM
AlettaOcean
United
92
07-12-2022 10:17 AM
Mudge
United
23
07-12-2022 07:16 AM
That Guy 74
United
38
06-27-2022 06:14 PM
TheFoose
United
11
07-14-2021 11:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices