![]() |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3699321)
Patently false. I was hired in 2000. By 2014, I was ~95% on the seniority list. Moving between bases has never been easier than the present. Where do you people come up with this absurdity?
This is a really stupid post. You're fairly new to the industry. Stop pretending you're an expert. Times have never been better as far as getting your base of choice. And even if the company sends more pilots to SFO/EWR, it will still be easy to get to your desired base. |
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 3699441)
Heck, many past new-hires didn't even know what reserve was, and i have to explain to them the importance of ensuring we have improved reserve work rules.
|
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 3699441)
Andy you are spot on. The "Mitigator" and "Hummingbird" are clueless and naive. It took sometimes a year or two to get transferred. And if you wanted to get to IAD or DEN, that didn't happen for 5 years for some guys because how senior those bases were. SEA was the same. LAX wasn't too far behind as well. These new-hires have it made. I have to remind some of them that their 2nd year pay was higher than our 12 year pay. I'm happy for the new bunch in almost every way, except for the whining crap I'm hearing about how they have to work weekends, and holidays, and so on. It's like the entitled folks that don't want to go back to working in an office for two days a week, thinking they are remote-only folks. Be happy you got the job, and only have it tough for maybe a year or two at most, with every option available. Heck, many past new-hires didn't even know what reserve was, and i have to explain to them the importance of ensuring we have improved reserve work rules. Oh well, history repeats. Good deeds get forgotten, and folks, especially the younger ones, only vote only for themselves. I've accepted that reality.
"It was the best of times, it was the the worst of times", but the "aggrieved party" will chant the same mantra. The only difference is, the "new bunch" of today will be the "old heads"(5 years on property) of the future. PS. Recently, it's been like warp speed . Pilots with 5 years at UAL(almost half of that Covid era) consider themselves "old heads" due to insane hiring(they are currently at 60%). Typically that took about half a career(15ish years). Percentage on seniority list is not synonymous with experience, wisdom, and "living the life". One minute in the ring with Mike Tyson typically isn't synonymous with 15 rounds of getting pummeled. BTW, I hope nobody gets "pummeled". The relative new hires have collected their guaranteed purse, I hope they don't have to step into the ring to learn 15 rounds of lessons the painful way. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3699321)
This is a really stupid post.
You're fairly new to the industry. Stop pretending you're an expert. |
Originally Posted by AbjectFutility
(Post 3699225)
Do you really expect our pilot base structure to be status quo for the rest of your career? I'll just break your heart now.... The company will grow, shrink, open, and even close categories regardless of this super leverage you think we have. Based on your posts on other subjects I know you are a thoughtful, rational person. My suggestion is that you find a way to get past the obsession you have regarding this issue. You'll be chasing shadows for years if you don't.
& I didn’t say the status quo for pilot staffing would never change (though that’s an imaginative extreme to take it to) or that no one will ever get a base transfer again. I was specifically addressing the straw man comment that this whole thing was about preserving QOL for new hires, & simply pointing out how it affects other seniority ranges as well. I guess I don’t see why that is so incendiary to some here. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3699498)
Thank you, zen master for the lessons in tranquility, but this is the period for discourse, & one need not be “obsessed” to engage in an active debate on the merits of the TA. I suppose I could criticize everyone promoting it by saying, “you know it’s gonna pass so just be quiet & let it happen”; but I’m in favor of a robust dialogue. When the voting concludes, it will be time to move forward- so let’s keep the horse & cart in that order.
& I didn’t say the status quo for pilot staffing would never change (though that’s an imaginative extreme to take it to) or that no one will ever get a base transfer again. I was specifically addressing the straw man comment that this whole thing was about preserving QOL for new hires, & simply pointing out how it affects other seniority ranges as well. I guess I don’t see why that is so incendiary to some here. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3699495)
Newer than some, older than many. I’m not sure how you calculated my time in the industry but I’ve never claimed to be anything other than a jack@$$ on the internet with a bunch of opinions. You are clearly a true expert, or you would not have been able to so quickly determine how stupid I am. I yield to your superior credentials, sir.
|
Judging by the amount of very new first officers (just off probation) taking the upgrades on the bid award today, the likelihood of anyone ever being “forced” into an upgrade is slim. A lot of these guys and girls seem to be chewing at the bit to go to the left seat. Plus the regional captains will probably trip over themselves to get straight into the left seat out of the gate. No one will be forced, a lot of hysteria over something that won’t happen
Originally Posted by rainyday
(Post 3699111)
well of course…. But allowing forced captn eliminates any leverage. At least we would have a chance at good leverage if the United “next” pans out.
|
Originally Posted by fanaticalflyer
(Post 3699441)
Andy you are spot on. The "Mitigator" and "Hummingbird" are clueless and naive. It took sometimes a year or two to get transferred. And if you wanted to get to IAD or DEN, that didn't happen for 5 years for some guys because how senior those bases were. SEA was the same. LAX wasn't too far behind as well. These new-hires have it made. I have to remind some of them that their 2nd year pay was higher than our 12 year pay. I'm happy for the new bunch in almost every way, except for the whining crap I'm hearing about how they have to work weekends, and holidays, and so on. It's like the entitled folks that don't want to go back to working in an office for two days a week, thinking they are remote-only folks. Be happy you got the job, and only have it tough for maybe a year or two at most, with every option available. Heck, many past new-hires didn't even know what reserve was, and i have to explain to them the importance of ensuring we have improved reserve work rules. Oh well, history repeats. Good deeds get forgotten, and folks, especially the younger ones, only vote only for themselves. I've accepted that reality.
|
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3699495)
Newer than some, older than many. I’m not sure how you calculated my time in the industry but I’ve never claimed to be anything other than a jack@$$ on the internet with a bunch of opinions. You are clearly a true expert, or you would not have been able to so quickly determine how stupid I am. I yield to your superior credentials, sir.
Originally Posted by TheMitigator
(Post 3699643)
Again, you are both completely missing the point. I guess I am not skilled enough in communicating to get you to understand that this isn't about comparing how hard the olden days were to today. I am fully aware of how long transfers/upgrades used to take. Enjoy your big fat signing bonus and the ignorance of not being able to comprehend what you gave up for it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands