![]() |
Originally Posted by guppie
(Post 3695715)
a. Reassignment and Overtime Pay
b. Elimination of mandatory FSB LOA 23-01 550 c. Implementation of all forms of reserve lines (VEC, Long-Call Only, SC line, Compressed, et. al.) d. SC Matrix/SC Cap e. Rolled Day Off protections f. Reserve MPG/Days-Off g. Holiday Pay h. Unused short calls, late-build short calls i. FDO Restrictions j. PBS Timeline and G-line k. Trip construction and rigs l. Assignment ladder m. Reserve to Lineholder n. Ability to preference minimum time between vacation awards. |
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 3695871)
What does the forfeit of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of sick time from every pilot get then? The company considers sick time to have a monetary value and 95hr+ drop no pay for sick calls scheme is ALPA endorsed wage theft.
2 You're changing the discussion. 3 With LTD kicking in at 60 days with the new TA, one can lower their emergency LTD sick bank down to 184 hrs (95hrs x 2 minus 6hrs accrued for one month). I've always tried to have 275hrs (95x3 minus 5x2) as my target sick bank. 4 We are now able to use half of our annual SL for kin care no matter where you're based. 5 We all know that we won't get anything for unused SL when we retire. If one chooses not to use SL when they should (flying sick), that's on them. |
Originally Posted by Otterbox
(Post 3695871)
What does the forfeit of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of sick time from every pilot get then? The company considers sick time to have a monetary value and 95hr+ drop no pay for sick calls scheme is ALPA endorsed wage theft.
|
Pro and Con letters are out.
|
Originally Posted by dingdong
(Post 3697858)
Pro and Con letters are out.
|
Originally Posted by worstpilotever
(Post 3695231)
cool...700 times a day: united 123 uhhh, let me think here, uhhh, yeah your gate is occupied, uhhh, what should we do with you? uhhh, why dont you hold on the green line behind gate 47 uhhh, yeah thats a great idea.
|
Originally Posted by Setopbug
(Post 3694323)
It’s not a concession.
Anybody voting no for this thing has lost their damn mind. How would you feel if someone told YOU that "anyone voting YES for this thing has lost their damn mind?" A little professionalism please. |
Originally Posted by Ace66
(Post 3698655)
If it's not a concession, then why did the MEC Chair just say in the Town Hall that this single issue was argued from February all the way to the last meeting in July? Kirby has all but said unfilled EWR CA vacancies were the reason he opened MCO. That's a powerful "tool" that we are giving up - so it's a concession.
How would you feel if someone told YOU that "anyone voting YES for this thing has lost their damn mind?" A little professionalism please. |
Originally Posted by guppie
(Post 3695287)
I’d argue that it is a concession, along with the 20 or so other concessions. Compared to 280 gets. (NC words, not mine). It’s a beauty, eh. That’s why it passes easily. Good value.
Who knows, with no forced upgrades maybe PHX and SEA or ??? would open up and drastically change the lives of hundreds of pilots. |
Originally Posted by CQKSNT
(Post 3698656)
what’s your bet on what bases shrink as a result of this forced captain provision? IAH seems to be on that list.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands