IAH Widebody growth?
10-14-2023 | 09:10 AM
#11
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 830
Likes: 3
From: 756 CA
I do see the IAH 787 getting CDG relatively soon. Why it hasn’t happened yet is beyond me. A major UA hub not flying to CDG.🙄
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
10-14-2023 | 09:21 AM
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 718
Likes: 17
I do see the IAH 787 getting CDG relatively soon. Why it hasn’t happened yet is beyond me. A major UA hub not flying to CDG.🙄
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
10-14-2023 | 09:41 AM
#13
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 15
From: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
I do see the IAH 787 getting CDG relatively soon. Why it hasn’t happened yet is beyond me. A major UA hub not flying to CDG.🙄
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
10-14-2023 | 11:38 AM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
I do see the IAH 787 getting CDG relatively soon. Why it hasn’t happened yet is beyond me. A major UA hub not flying to CDG.🙄
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
10-14-2023 | 09:40 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
I do see the IAH 787 getting CDG relatively soon. Why it hasn’t happened yet is beyond me. A major UA hub not flying to CDG.🙄
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
Just please not on the 767. Why management insists on subjecting our customers to an ocean crossing at .78 these days is also beyond me. IAH-MUC needs to go to the 787 too.
But again, what do I know.
10-15-2023 | 08:41 PM
#16
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
No kidding. Dude has bo clue what he’s talking about. I’ve crossed at .83. And climbed at .83 at 1500fpm in the mid to high 30s.
10-16-2023 | 05:26 AM
#18
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
MCO/TPA Widebody?
Do you think the current management team has any sights on placing a widebody base in MCO/TPA? Would that fit into their growth plans?
Last edited by WingsA320; 10-16-2023 at 05:35 AM. Reason: typo-
10-16-2023 | 05:29 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
MCO/TPA will not see WB growth. It’s simply an outstation 737 crew base…. WB will be strictly at hubs. MCO/TPA will not be developed into a hub.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
