![]() |
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3891430)
Cut all unconstitutional spending.
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3891430)
Keep income revenues where they are at until the debt is paid off, then lower income to match spending.
|
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 3891416)
Rolling stikes like the French rail workers( happened to me 3 times over the years while on vacation in France). I didn't raise my fist in solidarity, was I supposed to?
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3891430)
It's real simple. Cut all unconstitutional spending. Keep income revenues where they are at until the debt is paid off, then lower income to match spending. This isn't difficult.
|
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3891481)
R’s control all branches of government. If it’s that easy why aren’t they doing it yesterday instead of pitching a budget proposal that adds trillions more to the debt? Since I watched the circus last time it was in town I’ll tip you off: Don the Con is about to leave you high & dry on the budget. But not to worry- lest the true believers be disappointed he’ll unveil a perfectly satisfying excuse of why it’s all the fault of Nancy Pelosi & the radical left Marxists.
|
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3891434)
What income revenues are constitutional?
|
Originally Posted by JayRalstonSmith
(Post 3891528)
Everything outlined in the 16th Amendment, as upheld by Brushaber in the Supreme Court.
|
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3891434)
And to keep the answer shorter, what spending is constitutional? How many current elected officials agree with you?
What income revenues are constitutional? |
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3891434)
And to keep the answer shorter, what spending is constitutional?
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3891434)
How many current elected officials agree with you?
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3891434)
What income revenues are constitutional?
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 3891534)
tell us why the 16th Amendment and Brushaber are unconstitutional.;)
|
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3891481)
If it’s that easy why aren’t they doing it yesterday instead of pitching a budget proposal that adds trillions more to the debt?
|
Originally Posted by Hornetdrvr
(Post 3890710)
Yep, and the one before him spent 500+ days of his presidency on vacation.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands