New United assumes 70 seat plus scope
#61
I agree. It would have to be a sizable payout or a much bigger pay increase than the 25% that's currently on the table to give up scope, but I don't believe it ever came up. I think UAL guys would agree too. But once again, I don't believe it was ever seriously considered
I'm not saying that is your stance at all. Just using that statement as what management hopes for. Many senior people live in their small-picture world and could care less about the junior pilots if money is involved. I haven't met one yet that will admit to this thinking so I am cautiously optimistic that they won't fall for that ruse. Fortunately, we have two MECs that have to agree to let scope go out the window before it gets to a pilot vote and I just don't see that happening with UAL and CAL MECs given history on scope relief.
#63
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 46
Unfortunately, it's these "slight openings" that management sees and hopes for. "If we can pay off just enough guys, then we can get that scope relief." Your higher payout or payrate or whatever will be offset by all the junior pilots, myself included, who will be forced onto the street over greed.
I'm not saying that is your stance at all. Just using that statement as what management hopes for. Many senior people live in their small-picture world and could care less about the junior pilots if money is involved. I haven't met one yet that will admit to this thinking so I am cautiously optimistic that they won't fall for that ruse. Fortunately, we have two MECs that have to agree to let scope go out the window before it gets to a pilot vote and I just don't see that happening with UAL and CAL MECs given history on scope relief.
I'm not saying that is your stance at all. Just using that statement as what management hopes for. Many senior people live in their small-picture world and could care less about the junior pilots if money is involved. I haven't met one yet that will admit to this thinking so I am cautiously optimistic that they won't fall for that ruse. Fortunately, we have two MECs that have to agree to let scope go out the window before it gets to a pilot vote and I just don't see that happening with UAL and CAL MECs given history on scope relief.
#64
First off, I definitely don't agree with that thinking, I just agree that that is a reality that must be considered. Fortunately, the pilots at CAL and UAL are at a point of unprecedented negotiating power and absolutely have the power to a return to UAL's contract 2000 wages, work rules and scope protection. This contract metric still provides massive profitability for the new CAL/UAL. Not only does the combined company balance sheet and revenue projection satisfy this, the union has been saying this over and over (not sure where the confusion is). (Delta +1% - not a chance! Those guys are already scratching their heads as all revenue estimates are already strangely being beaten.) Obviously, if the company can give the pilots a little less, they will try, but time is on the pilots' side and the company is desperate to wrap this up quick, before quarterly earnings start rolling and the union demands more.
Originally Posted by oncea75cap
If the JCBA misses the fall deadline it will only benefit the pilots in the long term, but I don't expect that it will as most things were worked out a long time ago.
#65
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 46
Great! Then we are on the same page. I figured this from reading your post, but didn't want to ASS-U-ME anything.
On this part though, I disagree. I doubt very seriously if anything, other than dues check off or something inane like that, has been "worked out" a long time ago. Two hard ball management groups don't indicate to me that they came to us willingly with pockets open to say they agree to anything.
On this part though, I disagree. I doubt very seriously if anything, other than dues check off or something inane like that, has been "worked out" a long time ago. Two hard ball management groups don't indicate to me that they came to us willingly with pockets open to say they agree to anything.
#66
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
(Not getting tunnel vision of $$/Hr, a lot more to a CBA than that, just trying to get a feel of what BK did to the contract).
#67
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 46
Knowing nothing about UAL Contract 2000 rates.....I was curious what the rough ball park percentage in decrease (pay scale wise) your current pay rates are compared to what they were under Contract 2000?? I realize it's hard to quantify across the board....just a ball park guess.
(Not getting tunnel vision of $$/Hr, a lot more to a CBA than that, just trying to get a feel of what BK did to the contract).
(Not getting tunnel vision of $$/Hr, a lot more to a CBA than that, just trying to get a feel of what BK did to the contract).
Contract 2003 - 12 yr B747 cap - effective May1, 2009 - $178.93
#68
#70
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 46
The short answer is yes. "The pilots are so demoralized that they will accept 25% and trade away contract 2000 wages for scope restoration and work rules. This is the metric for an October summation." And a stake in the new company - maybe 10% - not sure on that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post