Information for pilots
10-24-2010 | 07:41 PM
#1
Thread Starter
New Hire
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Information for pilots
For all Continental and United pilots: Please visit www.savecalpilots.com for factual information the union won't tell you about. We are not a forum.
Thank you
Thank you
10-24-2010 | 09:35 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
This reads a lot like it is from some union busters trying to divide the pilot group. That is why they won't give their names. I could be wrong, but I don't see it doing much good.
Last edited by Skyflyin; 10-24-2010 at 10:00 PM.
10-25-2010 | 04:47 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
O.K. I read through most of this poorly organized site's ramblings and found a few very valid points.
For one, that the IAH LEC 171 S.T.'s op-ed piece via the "Magenta Line" is a clear violation of ALPA code of ethics.
I think we were all able to make that quantum leap in logic on our own. So if we take that as established fact, what is the purpose of this "informational" website and why not just post all these little tidbits on existing discussion forums?
Is it a move to provide an outlet for opinion? If so, that exists here.
Is it a move to decertify ALPA at CAL? If so, you are going to need to disclose some identities and show a better way a.s.a.p.
Is it a move to attempt to stop the merger? If so, you are going to loose.
Looks like just the musings of a malcontent or a wannabe site administrator.
For one, that the IAH LEC 171 S.T.'s op-ed piece via the "Magenta Line" is a clear violation of ALPA code of ethics.
I think we were all able to make that quantum leap in logic on our own. So if we take that as established fact, what is the purpose of this "informational" website and why not just post all these little tidbits on existing discussion forums?
Is it a move to provide an outlet for opinion? If so, that exists here.
Is it a move to decertify ALPA at CAL? If so, you are going to need to disclose some identities and show a better way a.s.a.p.
Is it a move to attempt to stop the merger? If so, you are going to loose.
Looks like just the musings of a malcontent or a wannabe site administrator.
10-25-2010 | 06:29 AM
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
From that website:
And:
Hmmm...how about the MEC resolution which passed giving the go-ahead for JP to run for First VP during the BOD? I guess technically leaving out information is not the same as changing information, but it sure seems it would be nice to have more information such as this.
Actually, many people's actions in this entire mess appear to be a violation of ALPA's Code of Ethics if you ask me, starting with the conduct of the IAH reps at the BOD. The owners of the website are doing the same thing and are in violation of the ALPA Code of Ethics as well.
We report the truth! We do not change anything. Some feel without a face to go with the site, it loses credibility. If you would rather be treated like a mushroom by the union (kept in the dark and fed BULL****), then please don't bother to visit this website. If you feel the need for factual information, we welcome your continuing support! The more information you have will only help you decide which way to vote.
And:
J P threw his hat into the ring for First Vice President just two days ago. This was after he states he would not seek a national seat several times and at a meeting held at LEC 170. We wonder why he changed his mind. Could it be he is a liar, or could it be he is a politician first and never a representative of the pilots. What else is J P lying about? As you can see from the results above, J P did not prevail. All we can say is thank God! Of course this means we are still stuck with a politician/liar for an MEC chairman. Maybe with some luck his days are numbered too.
Hmmm...how about the MEC resolution which passed giving the go-ahead for JP to run for First VP during the BOD? I guess technically leaving out information is not the same as changing information, but it sure seems it would be nice to have more information such as this.
Actually, many people's actions in this entire mess appear to be a violation of ALPA's Code of Ethics if you ask me, starting with the conduct of the IAH reps at the BOD. The owners of the website are doing the same thing and are in violation of the ALPA Code of Ethics as well.
10-25-2010 | 06:30 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
O.K. I read through most of this poorly organized site's ramblings and found a few very valid points.
For one, that the IAH LEC 171 S.T.'s op-ed piece via the "Magenta Line" is a clear violation of ALPA code of ethics.
I think we were all able to make that quantum leap in logic on our own. So if we take that as established fact, what is the purpose of this "informational" website and why not just post all these little tidbits on existing discussion forums?
Is it a move to provide an outlet for opinion? If so, that exists here.
Is it a move to decertify ALPA at CAL? If so, you are going to need to disclose some identities and show a better way a.s.a.p.
Is it a move to attempt to stop the merger? If so, you are going to loose.
Looks like just the musings of a malcontent or a wannabe site administrator.
For one, that the IAH LEC 171 S.T.'s op-ed piece via the "Magenta Line" is a clear violation of ALPA code of ethics.
I think we were all able to make that quantum leap in logic on our own. So if we take that as established fact, what is the purpose of this "informational" website and why not just post all these little tidbits on existing discussion forums?
Is it a move to provide an outlet for opinion? If so, that exists here.
Is it a move to decertify ALPA at CAL? If so, you are going to need to disclose some identities and show a better way a.s.a.p.
Is it a move to attempt to stop the merger? If so, you are going to loose.
Looks like just the musings of a malcontent or a wannabe site administrator.
10-25-2010 | 08:27 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Without proof its just more of the same untrustworthy drivel.
10-25-2010 | 03:19 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From that website:
And:
Hmmm...how about the MEC resolution which passed giving the go-ahead for JP to run for First VP during the BOD? I guess technically leaving out information is not the same as changing information, but it sure seems it would be nice to have more information such as this.
Act
The owners of the website are doing the same thing and are in violation of the ALPA Code of Ethics as well.
And:
Hmmm...how about the MEC resolution which passed giving the go-ahead for JP to run for First VP during the BOD? I guess technically leaving out information is not the same as changing information, but it sure seems it would be nice to have more information such as this.
Act
ually, many people's actions in this entire mess appear to be a violation of ALPA's Code of Ethics if you ask me, starting with the conduct of the IAH reps at the BOD.
10-25-2010 | 06:15 PM
#9
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
10-25-2010 | 06:25 PM
#10
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 15
From: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
Didn't bother to read it, won't waste my time. My take on life (and LC170 and 171) is show me the product. I will withhold judgment on my representation until I see the product produced for me to vote on in the form of a JCBA. Until that time I don't give a flying **** who gets along with who, who hates who, or anything else. All I care about is the final product. Give me a TA I feel compelled to vote yes on that provides time off, industry leading pay and benefits, job security, and I don't have to work until I die.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
