Search

Notices

CAL-UAL, who needs it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2010 | 09:46 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default CAL-UAL, who needs it?

Alright, here is an idea. Lets agree to disagree and sign an MOU that we will keep the operations separate until everyone on the list retires. We (CAL Pilots) sure didn't want this merger and I'm sure the majority of UAL pilots don't want it either. Lets agree to separate operations and separate negotiations and go from there.

NOWHERE DOES IT SAY THAT WE HAVE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT, OR THAT WE ARE "REQUIRED" TO MERGE THE SENIORITY LIST.

This is management's deal, not ours. They wanted/need it, not us. If they wanted our permission they should of asked us for it first. They did not. Our good VP of Flight Ops pretty much said they didn't really need to combine the operations to meet their goals, so lets not do it.

Lets be friendly neighbors, just not move in together. It sure would make things a lot easier.

What do you think?
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 03:23 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

The word 'whipsaw' leaps to mind!
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 04:38 AM
  #3  
13n144e's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: 787 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Skyflyin
NOWHERE DOES IT SAY THAT WE HAVE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT, OR THAT WE ARE "REQUIRED" TO MERGE THE SENIORITY LIST.
Actually, it does. The RLA requires both groups to negotiate a JCBA in good faith. Seriously doubt we could circumvent this, but even if we could the company has zero incentive to produce two seperate agreements. The only way it's a viable option would be to concede to operate indefinitely under POS 02. Kinda looks like we're heading down that road anyway...
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 04:59 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Skyflyin
What do you think?
Speak for yourself skyflyin. United and Continental pilots will be much better off with a merged company and one list. IF I have to give up 5% relative seniority to get it, I don't care. The benefits of a merged airline will far outweigh any loss of seniority I could get in the SLI.
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 05:46 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
... The benefits of a merged airline will far outweigh any loss of seniority I could get in the SLI.
Is this a hunch of yours? Something someone told you? Something you were told to tell others?

Though, it may benefit you personally.... and is UAL the merged airline of choice to provide you the best career?

Last edited by GoinPolar; 11-06-2010 at 06:15 AM.
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 06:51 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Speak for yourself skyflyin. United and Continental pilots will be much better off with a merged company and one list. IF I have to give up 5% relative seniority to get it, I don't care. The benefits of a merged airline will far outweigh any loss of seniority I could get in the SLI.
That is debatable, but I'm not saying not to merge, just not merge the seniority lists. US Air seems to be doing just fine financially without a merged seniority list.

As far as whipsaw, there could be language drawn up to prevent that.
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Skyflyin
That is debatable, but I'm not saying not to merge, just not merge the seniority lists. US Air seems to be doing just fine financially without a merged seniority list.

As far as whipsaw, there could be language drawn up to prevent that.
Have you talked to any US Air pilots?
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 07:36 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: 737 capt
Default

Originally Posted by Skyflyin
Alright, here is an idea. Lets agree to disagree and sign an MOU that we will keep the operations separate until everyone on the list retires. We (CAL Pilots) sure didn't want this merger and I'm sure the majority of UAL pilots don't want it either. Lets agree to separate operations and separate negotiations and go from there.

NOWHERE DOES IT SAY THAT WE HAVE TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT, OR THAT WE ARE "REQUIRED" TO MERGE THE SENIORITY LIST.

This is management's deal, not ours. They wanted/need it, not us. If they wanted our permission they should of asked us for it first. They did not. Our good VP of Flight Ops pretty much said they didn't really need to combine the operations to meet their goals, so lets not do it.

Lets be friendly neighbors, just not move in together. It sure would make things a lot easier.

What do you think?
This is about the dumbest idea I have seen yet. I know nobody likes or wanted this merger but it is a done deal. In about 4 or 5 months there will only be United Airlines as far as the public knows. Lets get PAID now while the perception exists that we are still two airlines. USAIR is not a roll model.
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 07:44 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=ron kent;897020]This is about the dumbest idea I have seen yet.

+1
Reply
Old 11-06-2010 | 10:58 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ron kent
This is about the dumbest idea I have seen yet. I know nobody likes or wanted this merger but it is a done deal. In about 4 or 5 months there will only be United Airlines as far as the public knows. Lets get PAID now while the perception exists that we are still two airlines. USAIR is not a roll model.
Look, if you want to roll over and just let it happen then that is up to you. I never said we wouldn't get paid. Doesn't the Transition agreement say that we would go to separate negotiations if we can't come to an agreement?

3-B. Resumption of separate negotiations and mediation.
Continental and ALPA will resume their negotiations for a separate agreement under Section 6 of the RLA, and United and ALPA will jointly request the NMB to reopen their mediation for a separate agreement under Sections 5 and 6 of the RLA, (i) within thirty (30) days after termination of this Transition and Process Agreement, or (ii) at the option of any Party on fifteen (15) days notice to the other Parties, if by May 1, 2011 the Merger Closing has not taken place, or (iii) at any time by agreement.

If you think it's a bad idea give some reasons, not just a blank statement. It sounds like a win-win for the pilots to me. If your worried about losing leverage, I think keeping your seniority would more than make up for that. We could even have the same contract, just separate lists.

As far as US Air, I said financially they are fine. The pilots are FUBAR. This would also prevent that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
learjunky
Regional
234
11-23-2010 10:41 AM
EWRflyr
United
1
10-30-2010 11:51 AM
Redeye Pilot
United
92
10-19-2010 08:02 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
94
10-18-2010 08:08 PM
EWRflyr
Major
45
09-17-2008 09:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices