Scope and the JCBA
01-26-2011, 07:59 PM
#12
Moderate Moderator
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Curious
Was the UAL forum shut down because it violated the court injunction, or because the un-washed masses (line pilots) were complaining to the MEC about what they considered important in the JCBA?
I.E., was it in-fighting, or court compliance?
Or is it because the MEC doesn't want line blabbermouths to give the Company an idea what we are thinking? (Poker; not tipping our hands)?
I honestly don't know, as I haven't been there in ages.
I.E., was it in-fighting, or court compliance?
Or is it because the MEC doesn't want line blabbermouths to give the Company an idea what we are thinking? (Poker; not tipping our hands)?
I honestly don't know, as I haven't been there in ages.
01-26-2011, 08:00 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 638
"pilot group was blinded by the ESOP, record profits, growth and lots of shiny new 777s."
Actually it was the MEC, Dubinsky and Roger Hall who were blinded by th ESOP. The pilots wanted to be able to vote on the ESOP and he MEC refused.
Actually it was the MEC, Dubinsky and Roger Hall who were blinded by th ESOP. The pilots wanted to be able to vote on the ESOP and he MEC refused.
01-26-2011, 08:05 PM
#14
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Was the UAL forum shut down because it violated the court injunction, or because the un-washed masses (line pilots) were complaining to the MEC about what they considered important in the JCBA?
I.E., was it in-fighting, or court compliance?
Or is it because the MEC doesn't want line blabbermouths to give the Company an idea what we are thinking? (Poker; not tipping our hands)?
I honestly don't know, as I haven't been there in ages.
I.E., was it in-fighting, or court compliance?
Or is it because the MEC doesn't want line blabbermouths to give the Company an idea what we are thinking? (Poker; not tipping our hands)?
I honestly don't know, as I haven't been there in ages.
01-26-2011, 08:49 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 737 capt
Posts: 335
Originally Posted by oneflynfool
Mostly this one, I think.
01-26-2011, 09:32 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Chaff & flares
Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
Or is it because the MEC doesn't want line blabbermouths to give the Company an idea what we are thinking? (Poker; not tipping our hands)?
01-26-2011, 10:58 PM
#18
On Reserve
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: LAX320CAP
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by barlowx4
...Good to see a fellow c57 guy.
Brad
Brad
Yours is easy, but with all of these call signs here how will I know the usual suspects? Back home I knew who to ignore, gloss over, or take seriously.
01-27-2011, 02:40 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Originally Posted by ualjd
Hi Brad,
Yours is easy, but with all of these call signs here how will I know the usual suspects? Back home I knew who to ignore, gloss over, or take seriously.
Yours is easy, but with all of these call signs here how will I know the usual suspects? Back home I knew who to ignore, gloss over, or take seriously.
-If your post has over 10,000 words, uses multiquotes, and ends with 'you can't make this sh!t up' -- we KNOW who you are
-If your post has randomly large, bold, red text throughout, you 'yell' at people you don't know, predicts the end of the world, and accuses anyone with a dissenting opinion of being a dupe for the Gang of 7 -- we KNOW who you are
Let's keep it real and get a great contract!
