Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Perceptions.  Too many "other co." changes. >

Perceptions. Too many "other co." changes.

Search

Notices

Perceptions. Too many "other co." changes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2011 | 06:13 PM
  #1  
Sunvox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default Perceptions. Too many "other co." changes.

So at UAL there is a frequently voiced sense that checklists and procedures are being changed mostly in favor of CAL's procedures, but I have this sneaking feeling that the same may be occurring on the other side of the fence.

So what say you? What's your perception?


Thanks,


Joe
Reply
Old 06-05-2011 | 05:10 AM
  #2  
(retired)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
So at UAL there is a frequently voiced sense that checklists and procedures are being changed mostly in favor of CAL's procedures, but I have this sneaking feeling that the same may be occurring on the other side of the fence.

So what say you? What's your perception?


Thanks,


Joe
The only old United change I've observed has been better organizatiion and definition of procedures between FM and FOM. There have been some phonetic changes to calls in evac procedures and rumor has it the monitored (low vis) approach procedure is going away in line with old United procedures. Other than those, I haven't seen much change.

However, I'm on the 737 which isn't a common fleet type. I would only expect minor changes anyway. The 757/767/777 are the common fleet types of concerted emphasis and activity.

Last edited by Old UCAL CA; 06-05-2011 at 09:59 AM.
Reply
Old 06-08-2011 | 06:17 AM
  #3  
Lambourne's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: B777 Capt
Default

The ironic thing is that things are always changing. We got wholesale changes to the 727 manuals when they were 30 years old and we weren't merging. Change is inevitable and part of the process of even a normal company. We need to make sure we read our changes just as we did when we were a stand alone operation, fly professionally and act responsibly. Doesn't matter if legacy CO or UA did it one way or the other, just look at it like any change that has come down the pike over the years.

L
Reply
Old 06-08-2011 | 03:06 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

Until a JCBA is reached, I feel no motivation to learn any of this new stuff. Most guys I fly with feel the same way I do. The others are just waiting for a buy out or retro check to leave.
Reply
Old 06-08-2011 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
HSLD's Avatar
APC co-founder
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
From: B777
Default

Originally Posted by ualheavy
Until a JCBA is reached, I feel no motivation to learn any of this new stuff. Most guys I fly with feel the same way I do. The others are just waiting for a buy out or retro check to leave.
Section 9 of the current UAL CBA addresses differences training. Just like Fuel School and Flywise, the "transition guide" is training covered by Section 9-A and 9-J.
9-A
The provisions of this Section shall apply to all training in which
pilots are required to participate, by the Company, on a
scheduled basis. This shall include but is not limited to initial,
upgrading and transition training, proficiency training,
proficiency checks, overwater training, navigation training,
requalification training and all training associated with
differences of an aircraft conducted at a local domicile, not
included in transition training.
9-J
Should a new training requirement be instituted which will New Training
initially require more than four hours of training and which has a
specific, required completion date, the parties will meet to
discuss and agree upon (1) whether pilots who participate
should be compensated and, if so (2) what form compensation
should take. This commitment to negotiate on compensation
under these conditions does not constitute a waiver of the
Company's rights to require pilots to participate in such training
under the present provisions of the Agreement prior to reaching
agreement on the issue of compensation.

Last edited by HSLD; 06-08-2011 at 05:32 PM.
Reply
Old 06-08-2011 | 04:55 PM
  #6  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

HSLD and APC co-founder, great point. Seems so simple and straightforward. Why both MECs didn't just take this stand from the beginning just seems unexplainable.

It would seem that from the FAA's perspective, follow the money. If we weren't paid, it wasn't done.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1stCivDiv
Cargo
24
08-22-2008 05:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices