![]() |
Originally Posted by SONORA PASS
(Post 1024555)
Moderators - Please move this thread back to the CAL/UAL Merger Forum.
Having this listed in the Career Builder Hiring News is a HUGE slap in the face to the United Pilots. They are NOT hiring pilots off the street, they are returning UAL pilots to work. :mad: I trust this was an oversight, and not an intentional insult to the furloughed United Airlines Pilots. Please correct this mistake quickly... (If you need to change the thread title fine) SP Title changed and returned to CAL/UAL Merger forum. There was no oversight.... the title said HIRING, when that wasn't actually the case. |
Will CAL pay for uniforms?
|
Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
(Post 1025200)
Will CAL pay for uniforms?
|
Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
(Post 1025200)
Will CAL pay for uniforms?
|
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 1025121)
Title changed and returned to CAL/UAL Merger forum. There was no oversight.... the title said HIRING, when that wasn't actually the case.
SP |
so lets see go to cal at the bottom of the list to get a big fat root in the rear pay freeze for 5 years abused on reserve like there is no tomorrow so where do i sign up.:mad:
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1023844)
Negative.
You will note that '7-B (Job Opportunities)' is absent from the partial termination section below (13-A). The pay provision of 7-B can only be terminated if the entire T/A is terminated, and since 13-C is no longer a player, that leaves 13-B. Which takes Alpa concurrence. 13-A. Partial Termination. Unless the Parties agree otherwise, the Airline Parties may jointly terminate the provisions of Sections 4-D (Domiciles), 7-A (Furlough with regard to United Pilots only), 7-C (Flying Ratios), 7-D (Domicile and Base Protection), and 9 (ALPA Travel), individually or collectively, at any time on or after December 31, 2011, if the parties have not reached a tentative agreement on a JCBA by that date. 13-B. Termination by Agreement. The Parties may terminate this Transition and Process Agreement whenever they shall agree to do so. 13-C. Termination by Notice. An Airline Party or ALPA may terminate this Transition and Process Agreement on fifteen (15) days notice delivered to the other Parties at any time following termination of the Merger Agreement under Section 8.1 of that Agreement. 13-D. Effect of Termination. Termination of this Transition and Process Agreement will not affect a Party’s obligations under Sections 3, 7-B-(iv), 8, 11, 12, and applicable definitions in Section 1, nor will it affect any outstanding payment obligations under Section 15. A Pilot who has been employed pursuant to Section 7-B will continue, at his option, to be employed by the employing Airline in accordance with that Airline’s collective bargaining agreement; however, two (2) months after termination of this Transition and Process Agreement his pay rate going forward will be adjusted to reflect only his accrued service credit at the employing Airline I'll let you imagine the potentials. Frats, Lee |
Wow, this thread has gone all over the place. From, a rumour to yay to it sucks so bad who would want to, to how much pay, etc. I am a 12/99 UAL DOH with 5+ years off for good behavior. I would love to get back to work, and let my wife stay home with the kids like she's wanted to since 12/99. I just need to know exactly what pay I am coming back to, for planning purposes. Should I figure 7th year UAL 320 pay or what? We could use a decent health, dental plan etc. with 3 kids. I know the current work rules at CAL suck, but, it can't be that way for much longer......right? We have to have a contract within the next year. I imagine, the way my career has gone thus far, that I will be stapled well below the CAL guys in the SLI, but, starting in 2012 all the clingons will be leaving, no? So, the hell should only last so long. I am so confused!!! Shed some light on me oh great forum gods.
|
Originally Posted by FurloughedX2:1025334
Wow, this thread has gone all over the place. From, a rumour to yay to it sucks so bad who would want to, to how much pay, etc. I am a 12/99 UAL DOH with 5+ years off for good behavior. I would love to get back to work, and let my wife stay home with the kids like she's wanted to since 12/99. I just need to know exactly what pay I am coming back to, for planning purposes. Should I figure 7th year UAL 320 pay or what? We could use a decent health, dental plan etc. with 3 kids. I know the current work rules at CAL suck, but, it can't be that way for much longer......right? We have to have a contract within the next year. I imagine, the way my career has gone thus far, that I will be stapled well below the CAL guys in the SLI, but, starting in 2012 all the clingons will be leaving, no? So, the hell should only last so long. I am so confused!!! Shed some light on me oh great forum gods.
|
Originally Posted by FurloughedX2
(Post 1025334)
Wow, this thread has gone all over the place. From, a rumour to yay to it sucks so bad who would want to, to how much pay, etc. I am a 12/99 UAL DOH with 5+ years off for good behavior. I would love to get back to work, and let my wife stay home with the kids like she's wanted to since 12/99. I just need to know exactly what pay I am coming back to, for planning purposes. Should I figure 7th year UAL 320 pay or what? We could use a decent health, dental plan etc. with 3 kids. I know the current work rules at CAL suck, but, it can't be that way for much longer......right? We have to have a contract within the next year. I imagine, the way my career has gone thus far, that I will be stapled well below the CAL guys in the SLI, but, starting in 2012 all the clingons will be leaving, no? So, the hell should only last so long. I am so confused!!! Shed some light on me oh great forum gods.
However, you need to do what's best for you and your family and spend less time with this blog board stuff. It isn't vetted. |
Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG
(Post 1025273)
True, but 13A is still possible.........it doesn't require ALPA approval. And what damage can UCH do if they start downsizing UAL in favor of CAL ops?
I'll let you imagine the potentials. Frats, Lee Sled |
Originally Posted by EWRflyr
(Post 1023993)
Seems to be opposite of all the other "pro-pilot" provisions you've mentioned. The reserve cannot waive his rest but SCHEDULING can decide to waive that rest??? To me, the term "waive" means in the hands of the pilot not scheduling.
Sled |
Originally Posted by FurloughedX2
(Post 1025334)
Wow, this thread has gone all over the place. From, a rumour to yay to it sucks so bad who would want to, to how much pay, etc. I am a 12/99 UAL DOH with 5+ years off for good behavior. I would love to get back to work, and let my wife stay home with the kids like she's wanted to since 12/99. I just need to know exactly what pay I am coming back to, for planning purposes. Should I figure 7th year UAL 320 pay or what? We could use a decent health, dental plan etc. with 3 kids. I know the current work rules at CAL suck, but, it can't be that way for much longer......right? We have to have a contract within the next year. I imagine, the way my career has gone thus far, that I will be stapled well below the CAL guys in the SLI, but, starting in 2012 all the clingons will be leaving, no? So, the hell should only last so long. I am so confused!!! Shed some light on me oh great forum gods.
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
As for health coverage, I am unsure if you would get it from the start. New hires go 6 months before it coverage begins.
7-B. Job Opportunities. (i) If either Continental or United intends to hire new Pilots, it will first offer employment to fill such positions in seniority order to Pilots on furlough from the other Airline. Acceptance or rejection of such an offer or failure to qualify will not affect a Pilot’s recall rights or placement on the Integrated Seniority List (which shall be based upon his seniority position at the Pilot’s originating Airline). A Pilot accepting an offer under this provision will be subject to the normal background and employment requirements of the employing Airline. The Pilot will be an employee of the employing Airline, within the applicable ALPA council for that Airline, but will not be required to serve or complete a probation period. Such Pilot will be paid the greater of (1) the actual hourly pay rate he was receiving on the date of his furlough, or (2) the hourly pay rate to which his years of service at the employing Airline otherwise entitles. (ii) No Pilot shall be entitled to more than two (2) offers of employment pursuant to this Section 7-B. If a Pilot declines the first offer, the employing Airline will not contact him for a second offer until he provides at least thirty (30) days notice to the employing Airline in writing of his desire to re-enter the hiring process. At that time he will be eligible for the next available offer in seniority order. (iii) Pilots employed pursuant to this Section 7-B will exercise seniority for all purposes at the employing Airline in the seniority order of their originating Airline but junior to all Pilots who were on the seniority list of the employing Airline prior to the Merger Agreement Date. Upon implementation of the ISL Pilots will exercise seniority pursuant to their position on the ISL. All Pilots hired by the employing Airline after the Merger Agreement Date who are not Pilots employed pursuant to this Section 7-B will exercise their seniority for all purposes junior to all Pilots who were on either seniority list prior to the Merger Agreement Date. (iv) Notwithstanding Section 27, Part 2.A.2, B.2 or C.2 of the Continental CBA, all Pilots on either the United Pilots’ or Continental Pilots’ Seniority List as of the Effective Date of this Agreement employed by Continental shall be eligible for Medical, Dental and Vision Plan coverage on the Pilot’s first day of Active Service. |
Originally Posted by jsled
14 hours in domicile between trips is WAAAAY better than 10 or 11 at CAL, wouldn't you agree??
Sled Domicile rest in EWR = 10 hours Domicile rest in IAH/CLE = 9 hours With the LAX base open now, I can't find anything that indicates the minimum domicile rest for that base. It's not covered in our contract or in the T&PA so something was missed. I'm sure scheduling uses the number that favors the company...9 hours. |
Honest question.....What happens to any future hiring ('recall', or whatever the MEC's what to spin the title as) when/if the "Sunset Date" comes about on the TA that is currently in place??
Hoping that I am wrong.....but I'm a firm believer that a JCBA will not see the day of light during 2011. Assuming this is the case, what will happen to the TA section 7 "Job Op" section/provisions IF the JNC's negotiations continue well into 2012? My only concern is the company will "TRY" and use that section's rights (Future Job Ops) 'against' the Pilot Group(s) in future dealings after any "Sunset Date" on the TA comes about. Can anyone clarify/shed light on how this may work? IE-UAL or CAL going outside the Furloughed Pilots in offering 'off the street' pilots jobs for future staffing while JNC negotiations continue. One thing I am confident, both Pilot Groups as they stand have been slapped/beat/punched for quite sometime. I would hope that the company's smoke-mirrors game of dangling the above mentioned threat over future proceedings/negotiations would be whole-heartedly snubbed knowing that we all have a MUCH bigger reward which we ALL need, and that's the industry leading JCBA. To those Furloughs that want to come back to flying at CAL, I am glad to see they are afforded the opportunity if you so choose......but to those who find constraints of being on the bottom of the CAL SL - "Reserve" with the current CBA rules, I don't blame you one bit. It does present it's "challenges" (IE-$h1t-sandwich) living under the reserve rules, especially those who are commuting coast to coast. Best to all, especially to those Furloughed Pilots making decisions in being 'offered' CAL Pilot Positions. |
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025486)
Whatever you are currently doing for employment is better than coming to CAL. If you are unemployed, this is also better than coming to CAL. I said the exact same things that you are saying about 4 years ago: "surely they will get a contract soon" "i know it sucks but it can't be that bad." You can read about how **** poor our work rules are all day long, but until you experience all the little nuances that they exploit on a daily basis here, you will not have a complete understanding of what you are getting into. I wish I could convince you to change your mind as it seems you are decided and looking to take a job over here. Perhaps your wife should talk to mine before you commit to this. Please think twice, and think hard: this isn't as bad as you are thinking, it is actually much worse. As for health coverage, I am unsure if you would get it from the start. New hires go 6 months before it coverage begins. Perhaps a good plan would be to come over,get the 737 type, or get current if you already have it, quit, then go to SWA.
|
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025486)
Whatever you are currently doing for employment is better than coming to CAL. If you are unemployed, this is also better than coming to CAL. I said the exact same things that you are saying about 4 years ago: "surely they will get a contract soon" "i know it sucks but it can't be that bad." You can read about how **** poor our work rules are all day long, but until you experience all the little nuances that they exploit on a daily basis here, you will not have a complete understanding of what you are getting into. I wish I could convince you to change your mind as it seems you are decided and looking to take a job over here. Perhaps your wife should talk to mine before you commit to this. Please think twice, and think hard: this isn't as bad as you are thinking, it is actually much worse. As for health coverage, I am unsure if you would get it from the start. New hires go 6 months before it coverage begins. Perhaps a good plan would be to come over,get the 737 type, or get current if you already have it, quit, then go to SWA.
|
Originally Posted by captd2000:1025880
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025486)
Whatever you are currently doing for employment is better than coming to CAL. If you are unemployed, this is also better than coming to CAL. I said the exact same things that you are saying about 4 years ago: "surely they will get a contract soon" "i know it sucks but it can't be that bad." You can read about how **** poor our work rules are all day long, but until you experience all the little nuances that they exploit on a daily basis here, you will not have a complete understanding of what you are getting into. I wish I could convince you to change your mind as it seems you are decided and looking to take a job over here. Perhaps your wife should talk to mine before you commit to this. Please think twice, and think hard: this isn't as bad as you are thinking, it is actually much worse. As for health coverage, I am unsure if you would get it from the start. New hires go 6 months before it coverage begins. Perhaps a good plan would be to come over,get the 737 type, or get current if you already have it, quit, then go to SWA.
have it your way then... Come on over, it is super here at CAL. I'm sure you will have a hard time resisting the urge to thank Jeff himself for this wonderful opportunity he has presented you. I hope you aren't one of those guys who consider this a recall, because this is actually just preferential hiring at a sh!tty airline. |
Originally Posted by dumpcheck:1025725
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025486)
Whatever you are currently doing for employment is better than coming to CAL. If you are unemployed, this is also better than coming to CAL. I said the exact same things that you are saying about 4 years ago: "surely they will get a contract soon" "i know it sucks but it can't be that bad." You can read about how **** poor our work rules are all day long, but until you experience all the little nuances that they exploit on a daily basis here, you will not have a complete understanding of what you are getting into. I wish I could convince you to change your mind as it seems you are decided and looking to take a job over here. Perhaps your wife should talk to mine before you commit to this. Please think twice, and think hard: this isn't as bad as you are thinking, it is actually much worse. As for health coverage, I am unsure if you would get it from the start. New hires go 6 months before it coverage begins. Perhaps a good plan would be to come over,get the 737 type, or get current if you already have it, quit, then go to SWA.
|
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025977)
I will as soon as I get a caill from above mentioned airline, or my construction career takes off, which ever happens first.
|
Originally Posted by beeker:1025984
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025977)
I will as soon as I get a caill from above mentioned airline, or my construction career takes off, which ever happens first.
|
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025973)
These smell like rhetorical questions, so
have it your way then... Come on over, it is super here at CAL. I'm sure you will have a hard time resisting the urge to thank Jeff himself for this wonderful opportunity he has presented you. I hope you aren't one of those guys who consider this a recall, because this is actually just preferential hiring at a sh!tty airline. |
Originally Posted by captd2000
(Post 1026090)
You just don't get it, Slick. I only have part time employment now. And I know who and what Jeff is. In my opinion, you need wisdom.
|
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1026110)
Come on over. You can then be part of solution. Every "no" vote is a step towards sanity.
Damn, I feel like William Wallace! |
Slick,
I too appreciate your candor. Obviously, your CAL job is better than no job...BUT, there is a huge cost in QOL. Depending on circumstances and expectations, there is a huge range of how good a "deal" this opportunity is. I can "pay my dues" for a year or two if I believe I will progress upward steadily to a decent career with benefits of seniority, etc...BUT I have gone down that road twice at UAL only to be s#$tcanned and having to start all over. I just don't know how long I could stomach the CAL rules as a commuter. |
Originally Posted by captd2000:1026090
Originally Posted by SlickMachine
(Post 1025973)
These smell like rhetorical questions, so
have it your way then... Come on over, it is super here at CAL. I'm sure you will have a hard time resisting the urge to thank Jeff himself for this wonderful opportunity he has presented you. I hope you aren't one of those guys who consider this a recall, because this is actually just preferential hiring at a sh!tty airline. |
Ok if I go to cal at the bottom of the list and then the SLI goes through, now all the people above me get recalled do I get pushed to the street and do I get credit for the service for pay if longevity does not get put in the contract?
|
Originally Posted by teedog
(Post 1026243)
Ok if I go to cal at the bottom of the list and then the SLI goes through, now all the people above me get recalled do I get pushed to the street and do I get credit for the service for pay if longevity does not get put in the contract?
First question I think is a definate "No". There can't be recalls unless there are vacancies to fill. Vacancies can be generated through retirements, attrition, improved work rules or growth. The second question is an unknown. I've asked Ted the furlough coordinator and he did not have an answer to that question. I doubt it happens, but the best outcome for us would be longevity credit for furlough time. I don't see the negotiators giving up anything to achieve that. The second best outcome would be to add the time in service at CAL to whatever time in service you have at UAL for pay purposes. Worst case is you return to where you left off at UAL (assuming your time at CAL is less than your time at UAL). |
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 1026256)
First question I think is a definate "No". There can't be recalls unless there are vacancies to fill. Vacancies can be generated through retirements, attrition, improved work rules or growth.
The second question is an unknown. I've asked Ted the furlough coordinator and he did not have an answer to that question. I doubt it happens, but the best outcome for us would be longevity credit for furlough time. I don't see the negotiators giving up anything to achieve that. The second best outcome would be to add the time in service at CAL to whatever time in service you have at UAL for pay purposes. Worst case is you return to where you left off at UAL (assuming your time at CAL is less than your time at UAL). Also, this is NOT a "recall". It's good news for those who need a job though!!! As far as the seniority, re-furloughed thing, I wouldn't say definitely "NO". I thought of the same situation. |
Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive
(Post 1026449)
"Ted"? ;) I spoke with TODD about my situation.
Also, this is NOT a "recall". It's good news for those who need a job though!!! As far as the seniority, re-furloughed thing, I wouldn't say definitely "NO". I thought of the same situation. Ted is a furloughed pilot working in HQ as company furlough coordinator (and also the name of a really bad idea for a low cost carrier subsidiary). Todd is paid by ALPA as furlough coordinator. Hopefully, Ted and Todd have similar information! Both have been very helpful answering my questions, too! |
How many furloughed UAL pilots going to CAL?
Does anyone have any idea what the rate will be on the furloughed UAL pilots who will actually accept a job at CAL? My guess is 20%. Any others?
|
Originally Posted by Bugs
(Post 1031481)
Does anyone have any idea what the rate will be on the furloughed UAL pilots who will actually accept a job at CAL? My guess is 20%. Any others?
|
WE should know more in the next week or so when they start making calls.
|
Think calls are this week. Start at the top of the list Monday, maybe?
|
Rumor has it that the first class has all 8 Guam slots are in the first class and that it will take 400 to get the first class filled.
If this is true, then it will pretty much put the 189 voluntary furloughs in a 30+ day by pass cycle. This will also allow more junior guys to come back until the 30 days pass. It's going to be an interesting and telling week. FMT |
First Class: 8 slots to GUM
Originally Posted by JMD16
(Post 1031536)
I would guess 450-500 to get the 186 ? number they are looking for. First class of 12 could go that deep while people watch round one and then jump in.
Bypass or NOt! Will you take it?:confused: |
Originally Posted by Bandera89
(Post 1031601)
Be prepared to answer.. First CAL class is going to be 8 out of 12 slots to GUM (As per Ted, UALWHQ). Don't be surprised to get a call next week, if you are 400 down the list.
Bypass or NOt! Will you take it?:confused: Question is how deep they will need to go down the furlough list to fill the last slot 7 months from now. |
Originally Posted by JMD16
(Post 1031610)
Question is how deep they will need to go down the furlough list to fill the last slot 7 months from now.
IMHO, some of the later slots will actually go more senior since a certian percentage of pilots that intend to accept the offer --but currently employed-- will wait so they are not at the very, very, very bottom of their fleet/seat/base. There's a big QOL difference between a bottom lineholder and the 8-ball on RSV. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 1031624)
Good question....
IMHO, some of the later slots will actually go more senior since a certian percentage of pilots that intend to accept the offer --but currently employed-- will wait so they are not at the very, very, very bottom of their fleet/seat/base. There's a big QOL difference between a bottom lineholder and the 8-ball on RSV. |
Originally Posted by JMD16
(Post 1031632)
Agree completely. Why I tried to say if you are 4-500 down the list and get a call for the first class it may be your only call to fill the announced hiring.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands