Search
Notices

2012 Delta + 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2011, 09:04 AM
  #21  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver View Post
...You may not care but I most certainly do.
Ok, noted...opinion diversity and democracy are both beautiful things.

Caio

Last edited by Old UCAL CA; 07-27-2011 at 12:06 PM.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 10:22 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Retired
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
That is my opinion too. That would be an industry leading contract.

I always laugh when people say "We should be paid what we are worth." There is a big difference between what people usually think they are worth, and what they are actually worth. We are worth industry average. That is what the market has decided our wages should be. I believe we should be paid towards the top of the industry, but not far and above everyone else. Industry is also relative. FedEx and UPS are not part of our industry. They are cargo airlines which is a far different industry than passenger airlines.

I just don't want to see United negotiate another C2000, then take massive pay cuts and furloughs just a few years later because of it. I'd rather get Delta + 1 and be industry leading.
Carl, your opinion might be worth something if you actually participated. We all know that you don't pay union dues for 'religious' reasons. You actually have no standing to comment one way or the other. You are a hypocrite of enormous proportion!
tailwheel48 is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 11:41 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
That is my opinion too. That would be an industry leading contract.

I always laugh when people say "We should be paid what we are worth." There is a big difference between what people usually think they are worth, and what they are actually worth. We are worth industry average. That is what the market has decided our wages should be. I believe we should be paid towards the top of the industry, but not far and above everyone else. Industry is also relative. FedEx and UPS are not part of our industry. They are cargo airlines which is a far different industry than passenger airlines.

I just don't want to see United negotiate another C2000, then take massive pay cuts and furloughs just a few years later because of it. I'd rather get Delta + 1 and be industry leading.
Delta +1 with UAL work rules is most certainly NOT industry leading. You can say that you don't think we should get more than Delta +1, but you are just dead WRONG that it's industry leading in any way. Give me ONE example of DAL+1 being industry leading. Pay? SWA. Scope? Ummmm... everyone BUT DAL. Retirement? Nope. Work rules? Nope.

Dues?? See above. I'm asking you point blank: Do you pay union dues or not?
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 08:38 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
throttleweenie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: A-320 Capt
Posts: 270
Default

SWA is a good place to start when comparing pay, but a GREAT place to start when comparing scope. I'd settle for SWA's scope clause as is!

TW
throttleweenie is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 05:40 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,553
Default

Some random guy called me Carl a few months ago, and now everyone says I don't pay union dues. So let me be clear.

My name is not Carl.
I'm not even sure who Carl is.
I do pay my union dues.

As for who I am, I will not give out my name on a public message board. I'm 6'6". That ought to narrow it down pretty good if anyone really wants to know who I am.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 08:47 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped View Post
Delta +1 with UAL work rules is most certainly NOT industry leading. You can say that you don't think we should get more than Delta +1, but you are just dead WRONG that it's industry leading in any way. Give me ONE example of DAL+1 being industry leading. Pay? SWA. Scope? Ummmm... everyone BUT DAL. Retirement? Nope. Work rules? Nope.

Dues?? See above. I'm asking you point blank: Do you pay union dues or not?
Actually, it's good for those new to the industry to witness the mentality of IAHFLYER. The more he types, the more his true colors show.

Again we find someone who believes C2000 was responsible for UAL'S ch11 filing. Nevermind 9/11, the dot com bust, and outsourcing on steroids.

Sounds like another special pilot with an "industry average" mentality.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 09:12 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
Actually, it's good for those new to the industry to witness the mentality of IAHFLYER. The more he types, the more his true colors show.

Again we find someone who believes C2000 was responsible for UAL'S ch11 filing. Nevermind 9/11, the dot com bust, and outsourcing on steroids.

Sounds like another special pilot with an "industry average" mentality.
So you don't think c2000 contributed to the ch-11 filing?
syd111 is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 09:57 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

I always thought iahliar was just a guy locked in his step mom's basement watching Star Trek reruns and playing on the computer.

I guess he's less than that. Can you say MANAGEMENT....
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 10:27 AM
  #29  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B737
Posts: 12
Default scabs...

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
I always thought iahliar was just a guy locked in his step mom's basement watching Star Trek reruns and playing on the computer.

I guess he's less than that. Can you say MANAGEMENT....
has to be a scab!
hotwing is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 12:01 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by syd111 View Post
So you don't think c2000 contributed to the ch-11 filing?
Personally, I think the airlines would have filed for BK even if their pilots still had the previous contracts. The crisis was too good to waste.
tomgoodman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices