Search

Notices

2012 Delta + 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2011 | 06:06 PM
  #61  
ualratt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
So you don't think c2000 contributed to the ch-11 filing?
No, because after exiting BK with the lowest pilot compensation industry wide, they were still tethering on a second bankruptcy as if you can't remember. Plan A was the same as B and plan C. Someone to tie the knot with. Without that the company was headed for another day in court.

The big picture dude, the big one...
Reply
Old 07-31-2011 | 08:37 PM
  #62  
throttleweenie's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: A-320 Capt
Default

Anything less than industry-leading is not industry-leading.

FAB
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 03:54 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by ualratt
No, because after exiting BK with the lowest pilot compensation industry wide, they were still tethering on a second bankruptcy as if you can't remember. Plan A was the same as B and plan C. Someone to tie the knot with. Without that the company was headed for another day in court.

The big picture dude, the big one...
Okay "dude" if you don't think it contribited to the bankruptcy fine but plenty would disagree with you. I am not saying the company is well run nope would never say in fact one of the worst companies I have ever seen. However the day c2000 was signed I was planning for a bankruptcy within 2 years oh well I maybe just a lucky guess.

Last edited by syd111; 08-01-2011 at 04:34 AM.
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 08:54 AM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

Syd, did you also plan on 9-11? Was the contract contributory? Yes. But any contract in 2000 would have been. So was the cost of fuel, lower than projected revenue, wasteful projects, etc. Was C2000 causal? Not by itself. To look back and try to pick that out as THE reason for BK is ridiculous and plays right into mgt's hands. Are you saying that absent C2000, bankruptcy would have been avoided? Fat chance.

Maybe we should just stick with the current contract, then, to minimize the risk of BK. We wouldn't want to put the company through that again, now would we?
Reply
Old 08-01-2011 | 09:02 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by furloughforlife
Syd, did you also plan on 9-11? Was the contract contributory? Yes. But any contract in 2000 would have been. So was the cost of fuel, lower than projected revenue, wasteful projects, etc. Was C2000 causal? Not by itself. To look back and try to pick that out as THE reason for BK is ridiculous and plays right into mgt's hands. Are you saying that absent C2000, bankruptcy would have been avoided? Fat chance.

Maybe we should just stick with the current contract, then, to minimize the risk of BK. We wouldn't want to put the company through that again, now would we?
No go back and read the post what I asked was you don't think c2000 contributed or accelerated us towards bankruptcy? As far as a reason yes I think c2000 was one in fact mentioned it to our mec chair at the time, hey an opinion right? Like I said our managemnt is terrible no argument there. But yes when that contract was signed I figured 2 years, no I didn't no 9-11 would happen since you asked.

Amazing on this site when you might have a different opinion about a subject. By the way I am not playing into managements hands in any way shape or form.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:33 AM
  #66  
EWRflyr's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 15
From: 737 CAPT
Default

Originally Posted by throttleweenie
Anything less than industry-leading is not industry-leading.

FAB
True, but you are dealing with a management team who feels that the industry-leading employees who work hard to create an industry-leading airline (certainly up for debate after this summer) only deserve industry-standard wages. When our executives practice what they preach and only get paid industry standard, then I might get on board with that argument. Until then,

FUPM
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 06:59 AM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr
True, but you are dealing with a management team who feels that the industry-leading employees who work hard to create an industry-leading airline (certainly up for debate after this summer) only deserve industry-standard wages. When our executives practice what they preach and only get paid industry standard, then I might get on board with that argument. Until then,

FUPM
Jeff has already enlightened us as to the basis for his salary. He is paid the average of all CEO's in the industry, according to Jeff.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 12:31 PM
  #68  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

If this contract doesn't break the mold on the upside, then we may as well pack it in, wear the nondescript "light jacket" when in uniform so no one knows who we work for, and remove the mirrors from the house.

Airlines' fee revenue up to $21.46 billion in 2010 - Sacramento Living - Sacramento Food and Wine, Home, Health | Sacramento Bee

LOS ANGELES -- Fees to check luggage, change reservations and upgrade to a seat with more legroom, among other charges, have generated $21.46 billion for the world's 47 largest airlines, according to a new study.

The report by a Wisconsin-based airline consultant found that the revenue collected in 2010 from such ancillary fees represents a 775 percent increase in revenue since 2007, when only 23 airlines reported collecting $2.45 billion.

The study by the consulting firm IdeaWorks shows that airlines have been enjoying strong growth in such revenue since the industry began adding extra fees in 2008 in response to the global economic recession.

The parent company that operates United and Continental airlines reported collecting $5 billion in ancillary fees from the soon-to-be merged carriers, the most of any airline company, according to the report.

Last edited by APC225; 08-02-2011 at 01:19 PM.
Reply
Old 08-02-2011 | 12:44 PM
  #69  
Gets Rolled on the Reg.
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
If this contract doesn't break the mold on the upside, then we may as well pack it in, wear a "light jacket" at all times when in uniforms so no one knows who we work for, and remove the mirrors from the house.

Airlines' fee revenue up to $21.46 billion in 2010 - Sacramento Living - Sacramento Food and Wine, Home, Health | Sacramento Bee

LOS ANGELES -- Fees to check luggage, change reservations and upgrade to a seat with more legroom, among other charges, have generated $21.46 billion for the world's 47 largest airlines, according to a new study.

The report by a Wisconsin-based airline consultant found that the revenue collected in 2010 from such ancillary fees represents a 775 percent increase in revenue since 2007, when only 23 airlines reported collecting $2.45 billion.

The study by the consulting firm IdeaWorks shows that airlines have been enjoying strong growth in such revenue since the industry began adding extra fees in 2008 in response to the global economic recession.

The parent company that operates United and Continental airlines reported collecting $5 billion in ancillary fees from the soon-to-be merged carriers, the most of any airline company, according to the report.

Exactly, thank you. Ever notice the independent profit/revenue numbers far exceed the company provided data??
UAL can easily afford Southwest PLUS payscales (Industry Leading) along with scope/work rules.
But regardless, with 85+% loads and pricing power, our desired contract is approx. a bag fee away.
If we don't stand up for that minimum, we will be the weakest group of unionized professional pilots in history.
FUPM
Reply
Old 08-13-2011 | 09:36 AM
  #70  
UalHvy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Delta +1 has never been anything but a concessionary contract. Delta +1 is even a PAY CUT for some people.

The companies offer of Delta +1 has ALWAYS included the exceptions...

Except their work rules...
Except their scope....
Except their vacation...
Except.... except... except...

I just had a SWA jumpseater last night. He will make over 250k this year and he admitted he is not even close to the top. He believes that the #2 in his Phoenix domicile will top 400k. I know another that made 314k last year. They have many f/os that make MORE than our highest paid line pilot.

It is beyond me why there are a few that would accept Delta +1. Please call either Wendy or Jay to let them know how how you feel. They can do a much better job than me on helping you extract your head out of your butt.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices