Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
CAL MEC Chair tries to divides pilot groups >

CAL MEC Chair tries to divides pilot groups

Search

Notices

CAL MEC Chair tries to divides pilot groups

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2011 | 06:55 PM
  #21  
uaav8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: 737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO
Opinions vary........
Easy for you to say...You didn't have to relearn much there on your guppy. Like I said in my earlier post, unless your a PMUA 756 or 777 pilot, you really don't fully comprehend what B.S. it is to learn all of these new procedures in a 1 hr video with NO SIM/FBS training whatsoever. After all, when you learned them (they are your procedures) I'm pretty sure you got to practice them in a sim once or twice, no? We didn't have that luxury. It's ****-poor training and needed to be brought to light for just how unsafe it is. It has nothing to do with your procedures. It has everything to do with how it was taught to us. I understand and respect that you have a "varying opinion" my co-worker friend, but I don't think that you are fully aware of the extent of the changes that PMUA 756 & 777 pilots had to undertake with a 1 hr CBT and accompanying pamphlet.

Last edited by uaav8r; 11-23-2011 at 07:09 PM.
Old 11-24-2011 | 12:44 AM
  #22  
13n144e's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: 787 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy
From the "Chairman"

"Therefore, even though externally we will use the United call sign, internally, I think it imperative that we truthfully advise our passengers that the flight is being operated proudly by ALPA pilots for Continental Airlines. I can imagine something like this, "Hello, folks. From the cockpit, welcome aboard flight 123, operated with the highest level of care and safety by ALPA pilots for Continental Airlines.""

People if this isn't the biggest dividing statement in the world, I don't know what is.

The passengers will be purchasing a ticket on the new "United" airlines not LCAL or LUAL. Yes it is true that until the JCBA and integration are complete we will be operating as separate pilot groups however we will/are all United pilots. If the Chairman can't see this then he is either stupid, trying to pay back the UAL MEC for not getting him the National ALPA position he sought or he is just plain trying to build fences between the pilots who will eventually fly in the same cockpits together.

Gentlemen and Ladies we must say NO to this kind of rhetoric and destructive communication when it comes from either side of the house. This is not some game show where the last man standing wins after playing his tricks on the tribe.

Chairman Jay you are out of line as much as Jeff was at EWR this past week!
Oh, *****. I'm not sure what your agenda is, but you and "Dumbfounded" seem oddly intent on stirring up division where there is none. I was there in person when Pierce first introduced the idea of the "operated by Continental Pilots" PA to the pilot group. The sole intent is to make the public (and, more importantly, Smisek) aware that the merger has not gone well and will not go well until the pilots have a JCBA. Sorry, but until we have a contract and SLI it's not just "rhetoric", it's a fact - we are seperate pilot groups. That doesn't mean that we can't speak with one voice as a united labor front. We're doing that and will continue to do so. But I refuse to join Jeffy's big merger group hug until we're given a contract. Frankly, I'm so unmotivated nowadays I can scarcely manage a PA, but apparently now I will have to start making an effort. The fact that you can manage to persuade yourself that Pierce's comments somehow equate to JLo's insults at the recent "exchanges" has convinced me your fairly comfortable carrying Jeffrey's water. I'm not and neither is the majority of the combined pilot group. If they want our help promoting this merger and making it a success they can give us a contract - otherwise we're just another USAIR and I'll do my part to make sure everyone knows it. This whole thread is stupid...

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 11-24-2011 at 09:51 AM. Reason: Language violates TOS; Post not Deleted as it is Quoted
Old 11-24-2011 | 01:52 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
Default

13 north:

"The fact that you can manage to persuade yourself that Pierce's comments somehow equate to JLo's insults at the recent "exchanges" has convinced me your fairly comfortable carrying Jeffrey's water."

First until you have walked the line keep your pointed finger looking at the mirror and remember your own words in the future.

Second, we are all pilots and it is clear Jeffery would like to nothing more than to divide and separate, which both yours and Mr. Chairman's rhetoric does. Words like yours and his polarize and divide. You can call the BS flag all you want, but when it comes time to walk together your words won't be "United, they will be "proud," different contracts, different seniority lists and different uniforms.

So talk "proudly" all you want while your fellow pilots actually work together to achieve the goals of being pilots who actually are "United."
Old 11-24-2011 | 06:20 AM
  #24  
Daytripper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Capt. B737
Default

Oh, ****. I'm not sure what your agenda is, but you and "Dumbfounded" seem oddly intent on stirring up division where there is none. I was there in person when Pierce first introduced the idea of the "operated by Continental Pilots" PA to the pilot group. The sole intent is to make the public (and, more importantly, Smisek) aware that the merger has not gone well and will not go well until the pilots have a JCBA. Sorry, but until we have a contract and SLI it's not just "rhetoric", it's a fact - we are seperate pilot groups. That doesn't mean that we can't speak with one voice as a united labor front. We're doing that and will continue to do so. But I refuse to join Jeffy's big merger group hug until we're given a contract. Frankly, I'm so unmotivated nowadays I can scarcely manage a PA, but apparently now I will have to start making an effort. The fact that you can manage to persuade yourself that Pierce's comments somehow equate to JLo's insults at the recent "exchanges" has convinced me your fairly comfortable carrying Jeffrey's water. I'm not and neither is the majority of the combined pilot group. If they want our help promoting this merger and making it a success they can give us a contract - otherwise we're just another USAIR and I'll do my part to make sure everyone knows it. This whole thread is stupid...
1+
Well said.

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 11-24-2011 at 10:01 AM. Reason: Quote contains TOS Violation
Old 11-24-2011 | 07:22 AM
  #25  
Monkeyfly's Avatar
Widebody
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: 777 CAP
Default

On a positive note...
Thank you New York pilots for your show of Unity!

Very encouraging!
Old 11-24-2011 | 07:33 AM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 13n144e
Oh, *****. I'm not sure what your agenda is, but you and "Dumbfounded" seem oddly intent on stirring up division where there is none. I was there in person when Pierce first introduced the idea of the "operated by Continental Pilots" PA to the pilot group. The sole intent is to make the public (and, more importantly, Smisek) aware that the merger has not gone well and will not go well until the pilots have a JCBA. Sorry, but until we have a contract and SLI it's not just "rhetoric", it's a fact - we are seperate pilot groups. That doesn't mean that we can't speak with one voice as a united labor front. We're doing that and will continue to do so. But I refuse to join Jeffy's big merger group hug until we're given a contract. Frankly, I'm so unmotivated nowadays I can scarcely manage a PA, but apparently now I will have to start making an effort. The fact that you can manage to persuade yourself that Pierce's comments somehow equate to JLo's insults at the recent "exchanges" has convinced me your fairly comfortable carrying Jeffrey's water. I'm not and neither is the majority of the combined pilot group. If they want our help promoting this merger and making it a success they can give us a contract - otherwise we're just another USAIR and I'll do my part to make sure everyone knows it. This whole thread is stupid...
Why don't you ask Capt Pierce what his agenda really is : What he said
to management was don't included the CAL pilots in this mess we want a free ride and if it works out ok - otherwise, Mr. Jeff, we'll be your chosen boys. Why don't you ask Pierce about not being supported for ALPA National President. His fall back position is to replace Fred - I understand he will retire shortly. He has an agenda - he just didn't tell you what it is!

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 11-24-2011 at 09:49 AM. Reason: Langauge; Quote violated TOS
Old 11-24-2011 | 07:42 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by uaav8r
Easy for you to say...You didn't have to relearn much there on your guppy. Like I said in my earlier post, unless your a PMUA 756 or 777 pilot, you really don't fully comprehend what B.S. it is to learn all of these new procedures in a 1 hr video with NO SIM/FBS training whatsoever. After all, when you learned them (they are your procedures) I'm pretty sure you got to practice them in a sim once or twice, no? We didn't have that luxury. It's ****-poor training and needed to be brought to light for just how unsafe it is. It has nothing to do with your procedures. It has everything to do with how it was taught to us. I understand and respect that you have a "varying opinion" my co-worker friend, but I don't think that you are fully aware of the extent of the changes that PMUA 756 & 777 pilots had to undertake with a 1 hr CBT and accompanying pamphlet.
No its not. Because once they are done with the WB fleets, the move to the 737 fleet. I have seen some of the proposed changes and I agree, it's not going to be good from a CAL standpoint either. Have you tried to find anything in the AIM, sorry WOM? It will be easier in terms of trying to assimilate the varying degree of changes coming simply because the CAL pilots have been doing it this way since AQP. I do see a classroom and a two sim rides for EACH pilot as an impossibility, though. The problem is finding common ground to accomplish the training, which between the two MEC's, will never be found.
Old 11-24-2011 | 07:49 AM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
On a positive note...
Thank you New York pilots for your show of Unity!

Very encouraging!

On this we can agree! Captian Jayson Baron, Chairman CAL C170, showed the leadership needed - he put it on the line and didn't hedge his position as he lead a combined CAL/UAL pilot group out of Jeff's room. Well Done!
Old 11-24-2011 | 08:38 AM
  #29  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Do you really believe the crap you keep posting on here DF?

Last edited by 757Driver; 11-24-2011 at 08:40 AM. Reason: Waste of Bandwidth
Old 11-24-2011 | 09:26 AM
  #30  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

YES driver, I do. What are you trying to do take away from the Council 170 Chairman at Mr Jeff's meeting?

Last edited by dumbfounded; 11-24-2011 at 09:42 AM. Reason: Can afford the bandwidth for the truth
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
PEACH
Major
14
11-07-2009 08:20 AM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
0
09-24-2005 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices