Search

Notices

SOC Done

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2011 | 04:28 PM
  #21  
13n144e's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: 787 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Coach67
Maybe I'm not seeing it. Before they couldn't use a RJ70 with a CAL callsign between EWR and say CLE. Now with no CAL callsign ... can't they go ahead and do this with the UAL callsign despite the CAL scope language? It's the enforcement and monitoring issue that causes me concern and raises lots of questions.
We've already won that battle once, when they marketed several flights as "UAL" because of codeshare. Certainly doesn't mean we won't have to fight it again, but essentially what has changed? The cerificate is still CAL, callsigns don't mean jack except to ATC and Strfyr. Your absolutely right in that enforcement and monitoring will be issues. They already are. But if we are to hold the line on scope during negotiations, we better still have it intact when we get to that point. You can be sure, the company and the union will both be very aggressive on this front before the JNC ever even discusses it. Much more is at stake than the immediate ramifications. We simply cannot afford to let this one slide.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C172Driver
United
87
11-23-2011 01:01 PM
13n144e
United
23
11-14-2011 01:20 PM
Nosmo King
Major
24
06-15-2009 11:28 PM
newKnow
Major
45
04-21-2009 02:07 PM
seamonster
Major
177
12-27-2008 11:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices