Boarding Priority
#61
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
I'm pretty sure it was a UA guy here who threatened JS denials. Also I'd bet the guy with his kid was a management type. They will trump you at mainline.
I had to DH to an outstation from ORD a few weeks ago, I never had the time to check in because of it being a last minute schedule reassignment. When I went to the gate podium to get my seat a Mainline pilot came over in a huff as I was getting my boarding pass and said something to me and the gate agent about UAX pilots shouldnt be bumping him and calling the chief blablabla. I just looked at him, stunned. The gate agent seemed happy to tell him I was deadheading. I just added that a airplane full of UA pax was waiting for me in XXX .. Maybe getting the facts before you go off the handle is a good idea, because it sure made that dude look like a jackhole to whomever witnessed it.
I had to DH to an outstation from ORD a few weeks ago, I never had the time to check in because of it being a last minute schedule reassignment. When I went to the gate podium to get my seat a Mainline pilot came over in a huff as I was getting my boarding pass and said something to me and the gate agent about UAX pilots shouldnt be bumping him and calling the chief blablabla. I just looked at him, stunned. The gate agent seemed happy to tell him I was deadheading. I just added that a airplane full of UA pax was waiting for me in XXX .. Maybe getting the facts before you go off the handle is a good idea, because it sure made that dude look like a jackhole to whomever witnessed it.
#62
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
He's just being a blowhard again. You'd have to be weird to change your whole life plan because you might get bumped off one or two flights a year when you are RETIRED. Not saying the policy is right or wrong, mind you.
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
As a senior employee, he can drop down to minimum flying schedule and travel quite a bit.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Exactly, so no NEED to retire! I call BS on any pilot that says pass travel is their reason to stay to 65.
#66
For your at-risk flying, I firmly agree all UAX pilots and employees should go behind UAL employees. As my spouse is a UAX employee, I have the "privilege" of seeing what is being said on some of the UAX employee boards. The sense of entitlement is astonishing for a company with someone else's paint job on the side of the plane, someone else's name in their announcements, sells no tickets, and doesn't pay for their own fuel. Just my .02c
So until you and your peers man-up and decide to take back what is most definitely "your" flying, I'm left trying to make this life & career work. If me having priority on my company's own aircraft is so distasteful to you, then take the flying back. Please. But until then, remain calm and deal with it. We don't have much; and after enduring age 65, this is really the only tangible benefit my family and I have left.
#67
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Open up your scan, increase your SA.
People can cry foul all they want about what the express employee "should" do. Sure, just like the 2 years the JS glitch existed. There were PLENTY of mainline pilots that "should" have done the "right thing". Nope, didn't stop them exploiting the crap out of that issue.
#68
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 12
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
IAHflyr, I understand your decision making process. Had you been able to be given a higher boarding priority, you would have retired early. Now that you will be penalized in boarding priority for retiring, you will go to a minimum work schedule and travel on your off days.
There are many employees who will decide to not retire just so they can maintain a higher boarding priority. As I stated earlier, I've had this conversation with other employees (not pilots) who plan on working (minimum possible schedule) well past their planned retirement date due to losing higher retiree boarding priority.
There are many employees who will decide to not retire just so they can maintain a higher boarding priority. As I stated earlier, I've had this conversation with other employees (not pilots) who plan on working (minimum possible schedule) well past their planned retirement date due to losing higher retiree boarding priority.
#70
Although it calls itself an airline, at the core XJT is just really a employee staffing company and it's profitability is based on the difference between what CAL pays it and what XJT pays it's employees.
And yes, we are working on taking the flying back. Perhaps you noticed that the UAL and CAL pilots are in the middle of contract talks and scope is one of the next sections at the table?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



