Search

Notices

Boarding Priority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2012 | 05:46 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 12
Default

We need to start from scratch on the whole boarding priority system. The fact that an employee who has been with the company for 6 months working on the ramp goes ahead of a person who gave 30 years of service to the company and is retired is completely ridiculous.

Years of service = boarding priority. PERIOD.
Reply
Old 04-13-2012 | 09:47 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Read on another forum that a new software upload tonight will fix this.

Put your assault rifles away !!
Jeff saved us again - are you now proud!
Reply
Old 04-13-2012 | 03:11 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped
Thanks for the info. Hmmm..... Well he's above about 15 UAL guys on the list so hasn't been fixed yet. I'll go file my report.
Maybe he is positive space on a DH? But fire away and cut off the jumpseat tiger.
Reply
Old 04-14-2012 | 01:38 PM
  #34  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Years of service = boarding priority. PERIOD.
Nah, I prefer the old CAL way myself. Retiree's behind all active employees.
Reply
Old 04-14-2012 | 01:39 PM
  #35  
757Driver's Avatar
Need More Callouts
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
From: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Default

Originally Posted by Once United
Jeff saved us again - are you now proud!
I don't recall Jeff ever saving us previously, do you?
Reply
Old 04-14-2012 | 02:04 PM
  #36  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Nah, I prefer the old CAL way myself. Retiree's behind all active employees.
Gotta agree.............too many already ahead of active employees. Hell, just get on our BOD and you don't even have to work here to bump anyone out of first class........................
Reply
Old 04-14-2012 | 02:08 PM
  #37  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
We need to start from scratch on the whole boarding priority system. The fact that an employee who has been with the company for 6 months working on the ramp goes ahead of a person who gave 30 years of service to the company and is retired is completely ridiculous.

Years of service = boarding priority. PERIOD.
Glad to see you like the ilks of Titlon and others who robbed you of everything having PRIORITY over active employees. No wonder UAL was such a mess. BTW, someone working for six months doesn't have all the time in the world to sit standby and wait for a seat. With the airplanes as full as they are someone with five years might NEVER make it on. You're okay with that?
Reply
Old 04-15-2012 | 06:44 AM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
With the airplanes as full as they are someone with five years might NEVER make it on. You're okay with that?
If there is someone who has given 25 years of service to the company ahead of them, then hell yes.
Reply
Old 04-15-2012 | 08:01 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
If there is someone who has given 25 years of service to the company ahead of them, then hell yes.
Can you name an industry/job where the retirement benefits/perks are better than an active employee? I can't.
Reply
Old 04-15-2012 | 08:18 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
If there is someone who has given 25 years of service to the company ahead of them, then hell yes.

iahflyr - I wouldn't waste much time with these guys. You have got to understand that they have always looked out for themselves - it's the culture. No respect for anything! I bet a few would take Social Security away from their own parents if they thought it would save them a buck. Let 'em rant on how good it was to not give their retirees a priority - I think CAL retirees even had to pay even the guys with more that 25 years.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heading180
Regional
6398
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
BlueSkiesAhead
Major
21
09-10-2011 06:40 AM
SoCalGuy
United
32
04-03-2011 06:25 AM
ecloebl
Major
22
09-22-2007 03:31 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
07-07-2006 10:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices