Boarding Priority
#41
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
AGAIN
Do you guys not read or what?
Most of us (retirees) are NOT asking for better benefits, only equal.
And yes the railroads and maritime industries are the precedent.
Guess what, that’d be the transportation industries, the same RLA industries most of our rules and contracts are based on.
All most of us are asking for is 1 (one) group where you line up by seniority.
The previous ual did have a group up front of 25+ retirees but most of them didn’t even want it.
It was shoved down our throat only because management wanted to pay themselves lip service.
Last but NOT least and here is the part you have to understand:
If everyone (both active and retired) is boarding by seniority (which they would have had anyway) then you can see it was of no real value in the first place. It was only a smoke screen so they could say there was some kind of reward for putting in that kind of time.
THERE SHOULD BE NO GROUPS
Note: I know there is a distinction between seniority and time in service but either would work and that’s a different subject; one discussion at a time.
Do you guys not read or what?
Most of us (retirees) are NOT asking for better benefits, only equal.
And yes the railroads and maritime industries are the precedent.
Guess what, that’d be the transportation industries, the same RLA industries most of our rules and contracts are based on.
All most of us are asking for is 1 (one) group where you line up by seniority.
The previous ual did have a group up front of 25+ retirees but most of them didn’t even want it.
It was shoved down our throat only because management wanted to pay themselves lip service.
Last but NOT least and here is the part you have to understand:
If everyone (both active and retired) is boarding by seniority (which they would have had anyway) then you can see it was of no real value in the first place. It was only a smoke screen so they could say there was some kind of reward for putting in that kind of time.
THERE SHOULD BE NO GROUPS
Note: I know there is a distinction between seniority and time in service but either would work and that’s a different subject; one discussion at a time.
#42
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Wrong. As usual. United guys aren't the ones threatening the Jumpseat action, pumpkin. That was Express. And do you read?? He wasn't Positive Space. He was an SA with his kid. But now that you mention it, I probably should push for mainline Jumpseat priority on Express fee-for-departure flights since we pay for your seats and gas
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 FO
Wrong. As usual. United guys aren't the ones threatening the Jumpseat action, pumpkin. That was Express. And do you read?? He wasn't Positive Space. He was an SA with his kid. But now that you mention it, I probably should push for mainline Jumpseat priority on Express fee-for-departure flights since we pay for your seats and gas
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
And if/when I retire, I'll hope the actives go ahead of the gummers. You can go to work, I'll call the clubhouse to adjust my tee time.
#46
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
This spurns another question. Did you ask said non rev person what their job at the express side is? Specifically if they are/were a flight ops management pilot? Because you're gonna love this. At my shop, when some of the redundant jobs were eliminated and alternare jobs had to be found for some people, they got awarded a higher than usual boarding priority than they should as as "parting gift" Not at all unusual for CAL management (NOW UAL management) to do that. If so, does that make you mad? Because it freaking should!!!!!! The numbnutz management pilots that did such a crappy job managing got an enhanced personal travel policy while the line workers just took a kick to the sack compared to the previous package.
Come on man, you're smarter/more mature/level headed than that. You KNOW this fight is between the management and labor, shouldn't even come close to a major vs. regional peeing contest type thread.
The sad irony of this whole thing is this, along the lines of the jumpseat fiasco, it WON'T be till enough mainline employees start expressing their frustration with this problem to management, it won't get solved any time soon. If it hasn't already.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
#48
<<"It's the responsibility of the employee to get themselves to work if they choose to live or travel outside of their domicile/base/whatever, not the airline. ">>
I'm guessing the the company you fly for never closed a domicile shortly after they opened it and you moved there, bought a house, found wifey a job and junior some new friends at a new school? Or they never parked a fleet and displaced a few thousand guys to other domiciles a thousand miles away?
I'm guessing the the company you fly for never closed a domicile shortly after they opened it and you moved there, bought a house, found wifey a job and junior some new friends at a new school? Or they never parked a fleet and displaced a few thousand guys to other domiciles a thousand miles away?
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Airlines close bases, furlough pilots, park cool airplanes, and go out of business almost every year. Welcome to the industry sir.
#50
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: DEN B737 Captain
Currently not flying for any airline. However if either airline that employs me closes up shop where I work, I'll either move, find a new job, or retire at a very young age.
Airlines close bases, furlough pilots, park cool airplanes, and go out of business almost every year. Welcome to the industry sir.
Airlines close bases, furlough pilots, park cool airplanes, and go out of business almost every year. Welcome to the industry sir.
I think this guy was my chief pilot a few moons ago.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



