Aircraft Order
#21
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
If you actually read the TPA carefully you'll know the answer (hint: the parts that deal with this are not the that can expire), but just to keep things really simple here's what co-worker jeff said on his interweb update:
"Our United subsidiary will operate the 50 737-900ERs, which we will use to replace our older, less efficient 757-200s that we fly domestically. The 737-900ERs burn up to 15% less fuel per seat than our domestic 757s, which will save us 30 million gallons per year for the 50 aircraft. We will use the 737MAX 9 aircraft to replace many of our older, less fuel efficient A319s, A320s and 737NGs starting in 2018."
But here's the kicker: these airplanes don't arrive until late 2013. Did he let slip that he is not anticipating a JCBA by then? Shouldn't there just be UNITED by late 2013 and not L-UAL and S-CAL?I have read the TPA a few times.. and the problem is, I'm not a lawyer and am confused with what Section 4-C. Aircraft, states.
On one hand, it points to Exhibit A with regards to current aircraft, ordered aircraft AND options of aircraft.
The 73-9's fall under the sCAL Option Category!
Then there is also subpart iii, which lists what aircraft each side flies with regards to adding aircraft not previously listed.. if they are replacement aircraft.
SO, you have 737 options on the sCAL side that are also being touted as sUAL 75-2 replacements.
A can of worms~
Oh, and you are right.. Jeffrey kind of makes the point that we will be separate for the foreseeable future.
Motch
#22
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 0
From: 756 Left Side
That IS the problem! They aren't banded on the sUAL side (who's 757's they are replacing), they aren't banded at DAL. The 757 pays more than a 737-9. So unless they are banded on the JCBA, which the shouldn't be anyways, we'll be flying around in a few hundred of the lesser paying aircraft. But I expected nothing else from a CAL CEO who ran a mostly 737 airline who pays himself north of $13 million a year.
Plus have I mentioned how the 737 cockpit sucks? I'm sure Boeing isn't going to give one more inch up there in there new
MAX.
Plus have I mentioned how the 737 cockpit sucks? I'm sure Boeing isn't going to give one more inch up there in there new
MAX.for 1 Jan 13, the 12 yr payscales were $219.04/149.50.
On the Delta side, -
for 1 Jan 13, 73's pay $205.53/140.38 and
for 1 Jan 13 75's pay $213.22/145.63!
So, you see.. the idea of pay banding isn't bad IF it's forwards looking. I expect any JCBA to payband these aircraft together as the 73NG's and Max are a direct 75-2 replacement.
As someone else stated, the new NG's and especially the Max will be more fuel efficient AND result in greater profits than the planes they are replacing. Some of those profit can and SHOULD end up in the pilots wallets.
Just my opinion.
Motch
PS> SouthWest pays $216/151!!
#23
While the length/cross-section are the same, the difference is from the cockpit door forward.
I wouldn't want to jumpseat in a 737. 757, I could just about take a nap on the floor. Lots of room for roller-bags.
I've never flown either airplane, but jumping, I would say the 757 is quieter for the guys up-front.
By accounts I've read here, the 757 significantly outperforms the stretch Guppy in climb and load-capacity at hot/high airfields (supposedly why UCH is putting the A-320 into South America).
Neither airplane is a joy to load as a passenger, but with the mid-fuselage door on the 757, if you were going forward, the unpleasantries ended sooner. I have ridden in the last row of an -800, and could not WAIT to get off the airplane.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Hoo-boy, the pay banding argument that just won't go away!
Why pay higher rates for the small fleet that's likely to go away sooner rather than later (along with the higher rate), than to include as many planes as possible in the highest pay category?
Seems like pandering to a small group of super senior pilots!
Why pay higher rates for the small fleet that's likely to go away sooner rather than later (along with the higher rate), than to include as many planes as possible in the highest pay category?
Seems like pandering to a small group of super senior pilots!
#26
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Otto:
While the length/cross-section are the same, the difference is from the cockpit door forward.
I wouldn't want to jumpseat in a 737. 757, I could just about take a nap on the floor. Lots of room for roller-bags.
I've never flown either airplane, but jumping, I would say the 757 is quieter for the guys up-front.
By accounts I've read here, the 757 significantly outperforms the stretch Guppy in climb and load-capacity at hot/high airfields (supposedly why UCH is putting the A-320 into South America).
Neither airplane is a joy to load as a passenger, but with the mid-fuselage door on the 757, if you were going forward, the unpleasantries ended sooner. I have ridden in the last row of an -800, and could not WAIT to get off the airplane.
While the length/cross-section are the same, the difference is from the cockpit door forward.
I wouldn't want to jumpseat in a 737. 757, I could just about take a nap on the floor. Lots of room for roller-bags.
I've never flown either airplane, but jumping, I would say the 757 is quieter for the guys up-front.
By accounts I've read here, the 757 significantly outperforms the stretch Guppy in climb and load-capacity at hot/high airfields (supposedly why UCH is putting the A-320 into South America).
Neither airplane is a joy to load as a passenger, but with the mid-fuselage door on the 757, if you were going forward, the unpleasantries ended sooner. I have ridden in the last row of an -800, and could not WAIT to get off the airplane.
As long as we aren't getting the french plastic lawn mower. That thing clunks more than a 72 gremlin. We need MD-11's. Now there is a quiet cockpit.
#27
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
CD-
I have read the TPA a few times.. and the problem is, I'm not a lawyer and am confused with what Section 4-C. Aircraft, states.
On one hand, it points to Exhibit A with regards to current aircraft, ordered aircraft AND options of aircraft.
The 73-9's fall under the sCAL Option Category!
Then there is also subpart iii, which lists what aircraft each side flies with regards to adding aircraft not previously listed.. if they are replacement aircraft.
SO, you have 737 options on the sCAL side that are also being touted as sUAL 75-2 replacements.
A can of worms~
Oh, and you are right.. Jeffrey kind of makes the point that we will be separate for the foreseeable future.
Motch
I have read the TPA a few times.. and the problem is, I'm not a lawyer and am confused with what Section 4-C. Aircraft, states.
On one hand, it points to Exhibit A with regards to current aircraft, ordered aircraft AND options of aircraft.
The 73-9's fall under the sCAL Option Category!
Then there is also subpart iii, which lists what aircraft each side flies with regards to adding aircraft not previously listed.. if they are replacement aircraft.
SO, you have 737 options on the sCAL side that are also being touted as sUAL 75-2 replacements.
A can of worms~
Oh, and you are right.. Jeffrey kind of makes the point that we will be separate for the foreseeable future.
Motch
#28
Otto:
While the length/cross-section are the same, the difference is from the cockpit door forward.
I wouldn't want to jumpseat in a 737. 757, I could just about take a nap on the floor. Lots of room for roller-bags.
I've never flown either airplane, but jumping, I would say the 757 is quieter for the guys up-front.
By accounts I've read here, the 757 significantly outperforms the stretch Guppy in climb and load-capacity at hot/high airfields (supposedly why UCH is putting the A-320 into South America).
Neither airplane is a joy to load as a passenger, but with the mid-fuselage door on the 757, if you were going forward, the unpleasantries ended sooner. I have ridden in the last row of an -800, and could not WAIT to get off the airplane.
While the length/cross-section are the same, the difference is from the cockpit door forward.
I wouldn't want to jumpseat in a 737. 757, I could just about take a nap on the floor. Lots of room for roller-bags.
I've never flown either airplane, but jumping, I would say the 757 is quieter for the guys up-front.
By accounts I've read here, the 757 significantly outperforms the stretch Guppy in climb and load-capacity at hot/high airfields (supposedly why UCH is putting the A-320 into South America).
Neither airplane is a joy to load as a passenger, but with the mid-fuselage door on the 757, if you were going forward, the unpleasantries ended sooner. I have ridden in the last row of an -800, and could not WAIT to get off the airplane.
Performance: I just used 10,000' of runway on a transcontinental flight. Picture a 757 operating on one engine and that's about the 737-900.
#29
Thread Starter
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
#30
Banned
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: IAH 737 CA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



