Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   System Bid Out (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/69794-system-bid-out.html)

Ottopilot 09-17-2012 08:46 AM

When I was on the 767 and 777, the FO's said 737 captain wasn't worth the pay. They got very little more, but lost days off. No one mentioned the work rules. Our contract and work rules apply to all aircraft. I'm not saying the work rules are good, I'm saying the senior FO's don't want to give up days off for a small payraise. Some hate domestic flying. Some hate the 737. To each his own.

oldmako 09-17-2012 08:49 AM

A significant improvement in work rules (particularly reserve) will make a huge change. Those super junior Cap seats will evaporate.

routemap 09-17-2012 09:08 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1261731)
Yes, and they weren't stapled. They were integrated with everyone else based on career expectations. NWA received credit from the arbitrator for future retirements, while DAL received credit for more WB flying. There were other factors as well. It was a complicated ruling. I has to read the arbitrators decision several times. :o

So how many involuntary furloughs did NWA have? and where did they end up on the seniority list?

Very interesting stuff here!

Short Bus Drive 09-17-2012 03:06 PM


Originally Posted by routemap (Post 1262337)
So how many involuntary furloughs did NWA have? and where did they end up on the seniority list?

Very interesting stuff here!

I know of one NWA furloughee who went back about two years ago. He went back as a 10-11 year FO, and is now on the 767-400.
Don't know where he ended up on the list, but he was furloughed, then was brought back at longevity as though he never left.

CitationD 09-17-2012 03:33 PM


Originally Posted by Short Bus Drive (Post 1262522)

he was furloughed, then was brought back at longevity as though he never left.

What a concept!

Too bad longevity (for pay) is such a difficult pill for some of our "brothers" to swallow.

ChrisJT6 09-17-2012 03:52 PM


Originally Posted by IAHB756 (Post 1262195)
I have a question. I have heard a lot about all of those 737's being parked and the claim that it was "for the merger" even though it occurred prior to the merger announcement with CAL. The "large widebody order" was also just prior to the merger announcement but nobody likes to talk about that. This "order" was obviously a bone thrown to UAL-ALPA by Tilton as it will be used as an argument by the UALALPA Merger Committee in their argument during SLI talks. Which argument do you guys want "on the record" as you can't have both. You either claim the airline was "rightsizing" for the merger or you claim that United had its own growth plans and these A-350's and 787's were key tools in the modernization of the UAL fleet(these were all replacement aircraft anyway).

This latest grievance which referred to CAL as an "affiliate" airline (skywest, expressjet, mesa etc) was laughable at best. If that doesn't show just how arrogant the UAL-MEC is I don't know what does. IAH-787 was announced years ago and the TPA allowed the 787 to be flown out of EWR as well in the future should that be needed.

We truly loved Mr. Tilton...he was notorious for throwing us "bones".

What was you question anyway?

shiznit 09-17-2012 04:28 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1261731)
Yes, and they weren't stapled. They were integrated with everyone else based on career expectations. NWA received credit from the arbitrator for future retirements, while DAL received credit for more WB flying. There were other factors as well. It was a complicated ruling. I has to read the arbitrators decision several times. :o

There were no INVOLUNTARY furloughed pilots. There were pilots who were still on bypass but all pilots active or not had been offered a recall.


Originally Posted by ualratt (Post 1261836)
Because it was a merger of two pilot seniority list and not a merging of two "active" pilot seniority list.

See above, it actually was a merger of "active" pilots, because technically ALL pilots on either list had been provided the opportunity to become "active", and the remaining were exercising their rights under the PWA/CBA to bypass recall.


Originally Posted by routemap (Post 1262337)
So how many involuntary furloughs did NWA have? and where did they end up on the seniority list?

Very interesting stuff here!

See above, all pilots were placed on the list as if they were "active".

SpecialTracking 09-17-2012 05:30 PM


Originally Posted by CitationD (Post 1262541)
What a concept!

Too bad longevity (for pay) is such a difficult pill for some of our "brothers" to swallow.

That should be the least wet could offer. The 2172/1437 have suffered enough.

CitationD 09-17-2012 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1262602)
That should be the least wet could offer. The 2172/1437 have suffered enough.

Thanks - and may Karma find anyone who disagrees. ;)

Ottopilot 09-17-2012 05:55 PM


Originally Posted by oldmako (Post 1262327)
A significant improvement in work rules (particularly reserve) will make a huge change. Those super junior Cap seats will evaporate.

They are junior, but not super junior. Number 3000 out of 5000 is not super junior. With retirements soon to come they will be even more senior. They may seem junior date of hire, but not in %.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands