Search

Notices

System Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2012 | 05:22 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IAHB756
Yep.
Let's keep our eye on the ball.
Agree 100% here. Take the recent Skywest/XJT/ASA meeting where they discussed merging their pilot groups. Jeff earned his wings under Bethune and probably took note of an all Boeing fleet along with only having to deal with a single feed carrier for many of CALs best years.

We had a system CP mention parking all the Airbus by 2020. In addition there are various manufacturers (Bombardier, Mitsubishi, etc.) investing lots of capital into churning out 100 seat RJs (Skywest just happened too place a large order for 100).

I must tip my cap too our brothers at AMR on this labor day weekend, it's refreshing to see labor surprise management and disrupt their plans for a while.

Happy Labor Day
Reply
Old 08-31-2012 | 07:07 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SOTeric
Hoss...this 757 guy is not worth getting worked up about. He's obsessed with where he'll fall on the SLI...and as many UAL guys as he can step over.

We'll have our day before the arbitration panel.

...........................
Reply
Old 08-31-2012 | 07:11 PM
  #53  
I'd rather be hunting
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: B737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by SOTeric
Hoss...this 757 guy is not worth getting worked up about. He's obsessed with where he'll fall on the SLI...and as many UAL guys as he can step over.

We'll have our day before the arbitration panel.
So what you are really saying is that you don't have any facts to discredit what IAHB756 is saying or support what Airhoss is saying.

The SLI will be done in arbitration. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.
Reply
Old 08-31-2012 | 08:02 PM
  #54  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

First off, you are quoting someone else as that doesn't sound like anything I have said.
IAH,

Sorry I that was not you, my apologies. And I was counting our combined 757/767 fleet we have 96 757's.

Yet you continue to bash CAL pilots because of the growth here but when growth is aimed at UAL, you bemoan us for taking away your precious 757.
EWR73FO the question goes to you. How is a one for one replacement on lower paying airframe growth in your book? The 737 order for UAL is NOT a growth order it's a replacement order.

Last edited by Airhoss; 08-31-2012 at 08:12 PM.
Reply
Old 08-31-2012 | 08:14 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
IAH,

Sorry I that was not you, my apologies.

No worries at all. We all get things wrong on these forums from time to time. Fact: I actually took a half hour looking up the current 757 fleet count for our combined airline etc. as the only info I had was 2 years old. Just how stupid am I? Has either carrier taken delivery of 757's lately? Duh! I cannot wait to get this damn SLI done so you and I and everyone else who is currently arguing and bashing each other can finally take a step back, and realize that we are working for the same airline and towards the same goals and we might even share a cockpit in some form or fashion one day. I look forward to that no matter what seat I am in.

IAH
Reply
Old 08-31-2012 | 08:20 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
IAH,

Sorry I that was not you, my apologies. And I was counting our combined 757/767 fleet we have 96 757's.



EWR73FO the question goes to you. How is a one for one replacement on lower paying airframe growth in your book? The 737 order for UAL is NOT a growth order it's a replacement order.

I will make one point here. The 737-800/900 at CAL pays more than the 757/767 at UAL today by about $10 bucks an hour. Not that I think this will carry forward into the new contract, it is today a fact. The numbers I have seen for the new contract leave the 757-200 at about the same pay rate as the 737-800/900 which ****es me off. That will be a no vote from me. Our 757-200's fly all night high yield trips across the Atlantic with pilots who are always fatigued while the 737 flies a lot of daytime trips that are fairly simple on the time clock. I will fight this to the end with those whom lend me an ear that have a say on either side of this debate...
Reply
Old 08-31-2012 | 09:02 PM
  #57  
I'd rather be hunting
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: B737 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by IAHB756
while the 737 flies a lot of daytime trips that are fairly simple on the time clock.
I have to disagree with you here IAHB756. Maybe, pre-merger but not now. If you look at open time trips on the 73 you will see a lot more red-eyes than pre-merger. After the merger the swap-a-roo of flying added more red-eyes to the LCAL side due to differences in LUAL's and LCAL's work rules in their respective CBAs.
Reply
Old 09-01-2012 | 05:17 AM
  #58  
Sonny Crockett's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 3
From: B777
Default

Originally Posted by Mwindaji
I have to disagree with you here IAHB756. Maybe, pre-merger but not now. If you look at open time trips on the 73 you will see a lot more red-eyes than pre-merger. After the merger the swap-a-roo of flying added more red-eyes to the LCAL side due to differences in LUAL's and LCAL's work rules in their respective CBAs.
Second that! As a L-UAL guy flying on the CAL side....I can assure you that the 73 flying is a TON OF RED EYE's.
Reply
Old 09-01-2012 | 05:31 AM
  #59  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mwindaji
I have to disagree with you here IAHB756. Maybe, pre-merger but not now. If you look at open time trips on the 73 you will see a lot more red-eyes than pre-merger. After the merger the swap-a-roo of flying added more red-eyes to the LCAL side due to differences in LUAL's and LCAL's work rules in their respective CBAs.
And how. UAL contract requires 16 hours of no duty before a redeye while there is nothing in the CAL contract therefore rest before a redeye is FAR mins. As a result, CAL flies first day in the morning, redeyes later that same day, lands early on second day. To do the same trip UAL has to fly on day one, rest on day two, and redeye late on day two into a third day. They gained a one-third efficiency in pilots doing redeyes simply by shifting redeyes to CAL. Hopefully this will go away under the new contract.

Last edited by APC225; 09-01-2012 at 05:44 AM.
Reply
Old 09-01-2012 | 08:31 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
And how. UAL contract requires 16 hours of no duty before a redeye while there is nothing in the CAL contract therefore rest before a redeye is FAR mins. As a result, CAL flies first day in the morning, redeyes later that same day, lands early on second day. To do the same trip UAL has to fly on day one, rest on day two, and redeye late on day two into a third day. They gained a one-third efficiency in pilots doing redeyes simply by shifting redeyes to CAL. Hopefully this will go away under the new contract.

I thought the 737 had some new agreement where schedules would not be built with double duty periods in a single calender day. The 756 domestic still has a few trips with early morning flights West for 9 hours at the hotel then redeye to East Coast(IAD/EWR) for normal rest then back at it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
67
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
23
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
EWR73FO
United
170
02-11-2011 11:10 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices