Search

Notices

System Bid Out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2012 | 11:22 AM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by APC225
And how. UAL contract requires 16 hours of no duty before a redeye while there is nothing in the CAL contract therefore rest before a redeye is FAR mins. As a result, CAL flies first day in the morning, redeyes later that same day, lands early on second day. To do the same trip UAL has to fly on day one, rest on day two, and redeye late on day two into a third day. They gained a one-third efficiency in pilots doing redeyes simply by shifting redeyes to CAL. Hopefully this will go away under the new contract.

I thought the 737 had some new agreement where schedules would not be built with double duty periods in a single calender day. The 756 domestic still has a few trips with early morning flights West for 9 hours at the hotel then redeye to East Coast(IAD/EWR) for normal rest then back at it.
Not Quite. The agreement keeps PBS from building a line with one trip ending early then another starting later in the day. Within a pairing, this practice is alive and well.

Also, this applies to line construction only, so reserves are being abused just as they always have.
Reply
Old 09-01-2012 | 11:35 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IAHB756
I will make one point here. The 737-800/900 at CAL pays more than the 757/767 at UAL today by about $10 bucks an hour. Not that I think this will carry forward into the new contract, it is today a fact. The numbers I have seen for the new contract leave the 757-200 at about the same pay rate as the 737-800/900 which ****es me off. That will be a no vote from me. Our 757-200's fly all night high yield trips across the Atlantic with pilots who are always fatigued while the 737 flies a lot of daytime trips that are fairly simple on the time clock. I will fight this to the end with those whom lend me an ear that have a say on either side of this debate...
Yes, let's demand that the 737 pay less than the 757! This will make us all so proud after the majority of 757s are scrapped in favor of the 737.

As for 737 pilots not being fatigued, are you serious? I routinely fly six time zone trips and trips that flips morning for night/red eye flying. What you should be demanding is a back-side of he clock override for ALL fleet types.

By the way, don't be surprised when the 737max starts flying to Europe. I'm not saying I like it, just that it's in play in the coming years.

It continues to amaze me how short sighted pilots can be.
Reply
Old 09-01-2012 | 12:02 PM
  #63  
APC225's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IAHB756
I thought the 737 had some new agreement where schedules would not be built with double duty periods in a single calender day. The 756 domestic still has a few trips with early morning flights West for 9 hours at the hotel then redeye to East Coast(IAD/EWR) for normal rest then back at it.
You are right. This was a small victory for the Fatigue Review Committee. Unfortunately, it was a very narrow agreement with the company, based on the data they had accumulated from reported fatigue events.

Last edited by APC225; 09-01-2012 at 12:16 PM.
Reply
Old 09-01-2012 | 02:13 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
Yes, let's demand that the 737 pay less than the 757! This will make us all so proud after the majority of 757s are scrapped in favor of the 737.

As for 737 pilots not being fatigued, are you serious? I routinely fly six time zone trips and trips that flips morning for night/red eye flying. What you should be demanding is a back-side of he clock override for ALL fleet types.

By the way, don't be surprised when the 737max starts flying to Europe. I'm not saying I like it, just that it's in play in the coming years.

It continues to amaze me how short sighted pilots can be.

I think you need to step back from the computer and stop being so sensitive. Nobody is attacking your 737 or asking to have the hourly rates lowered on it. What I was trying to say before the small airplane paranoia set in was that the 757-200 was separated from the 757-300 in terms of pay yet the 757-200 flies the Atlantic bringing in premium revenue for the company with pilots who start every trip on the back side of the clock. My guess is that the union thinks that a 6 buck CA and 4 buck FO override will be good enough to pacify the pilot group. I know the 737 is doing redye flying these days. Only the 737 got the new carve out in by the pairing construction committee. I wonder why the 757 was not included in that? My guess is that is was political as many 756 bidders actually bid for double duty periods to maximize days off and reduce commutes. It is the reserves that cannot plan for a double duty period and it is the reserves, regardless of the fleet who pay the fatigue price.

Please don't think I'm so short sided that I would want to lower the rates on a piece of equipment in our fleet. That being said, I hope the day never comes when they actually attempt to fly the 737's to Europe. 757's to the U.K are perfect. I thought one of the great things this merger brought was the almighty 767-300 which can replace our long haul European 757's freeing them up for some South America routes where our 737's are leaving cargo behind on. I doubt we will put ourselves in a fleet situation where the 737 will be tasked with transatlantic trips running the APU for several hours. Look at the West Coast to Hawaii market. The 737's are not doing as much of that flying as the 757-300 have been put on most of those runs along with the UAL 757-200's and 767's (both the -300 and -400). That is the best example of fleet optimization I have seen to date post merger announcement.
Reply
Old 09-03-2012 | 01:29 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: iah 73 fo
Default

you guys parked the 73s cause your scope sucks and most of your domestic flying is done by regional airlines. Wishful thinking on your part that it was for a cal merger...and no, you don't get anything for that in a merger. Thanks for the laugh tho
Reply
Old 09-03-2012 | 02:33 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CAL 73
you guys parked the 73s cause your scope sucks and most of your domestic flying is done by regional airlines. Wishful thinking on your part that it was for a cal merger...and no, you don't get anything for that in a merger. Thanks for the laugh tho
Scope sucked since 2003...Guppys flew until 2008 around the same time Jeff's predecessor refused to continue merger discussions. I don't much care if you laugh...as long as the mediators keep taking it seriously.
Reply
Old 09-03-2012 | 08:14 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by IAHB756
First off, you are quoting someone else as that doesn't sound like anything I have said. Please provide the full quote so we can attribute that comment to the correct person.

Secondly, United doesn't even have 150 757's in their fleet. Our combined fleet only comprises 138 757-200 series jets and of those, 41 are new, Rolls Royce powered, ETOPS and winglet equiped Continental jets with 2 cockpit jumpseats so YES, I am correcting you here. I am pretty confident that around 85-90 UAL 757's are targeted for replacement over the next five years with the remaining ETOPS 757's (8 or so?) staying around for a good while. Remember I said this as the first bid post SLI will have a separate category for these aircraft as they will be flown on domestic routes and Mexico/Central America by separate category of pilots that will not be trained on the 767-400. If domestic 757 is someone's thing, it will be a perfect gig that comes with displacement rights when he/she is surplused off the equipment as the airframes are retired. I do not believe the 767-400 will be fenced at all so what I am saying here is that I believe the 757's slated for retirement will be a separate category, available for bid by anyone who can hold it post SLI, just like the 756 catagory which will contain all the other aircraft(757-300, 767-300, 767-400).

Again, the quote above does not sound like me. I am not trying to be argumentative. Have a great Labor Day Weekend!
Interesting. UAL has 17 ETOPS 757s flying right now. We also have 13 Premium Service (currently 110 seats in 3-class config) non ETOPS birds that are getting expensive makeovers, so I don't know which one's we'll keep.

Sled
Reply
Old 09-04-2012 | 12:12 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Capt
Default

Originally Posted by CAL 73
you guys parked the 73s cause your scope sucks and most of your domestic flying is done by regional airlines. Wishful thinking on your part that it was for a cal merger...and no, you don't get anything for that in a merger. Thanks for the laugh tho
If you really beleive that you are either too lazy to look into UAL's history, you have your head in the sand, or you are seriously mentally challenged.
Reply
Old 09-04-2012 | 04:57 AM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: iah 73 fo
Default

Originally Posted by Freight Dawg
If you really beleive that you are either too lazy to look into UAL's history, you have your head in the sand, or you are seriously mentally challenged.
Larry broke off talks with United cause he saw how unhealthy (financially)that airline was. Its not only my view but of fellow pilots at various majors that United was not going to be around for much longer. I am sick and tires of multiple united guys feeling entitled to what me!-me!-me! should get because of various reasons like "well, we parked those jets just to merge with you guys", "we saved you guys", "we are United". United would be dead without any merger its time to admit that.
Reply
Old 09-04-2012 | 05:22 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by CAL 73
Larry broke off talks with United cause he saw how unhealthy (financially)that airline was. Its not only my view but of fellow pilots at various majors that United was not going to be around for much longer. I am sick and tires of multiple united guys feeling entitled to what me!-me!-me! should get because of various reasons like "well, we parked those jets just to merge with you guys", "we saved you guys", "we are United". United would be dead without any merger its time to admit that.
United would be dead...that's what I heard in 2003. What was it..."United is HIV positive". Nice tidbit from Bethune. Well, we're still here. CAL is gone. Most of us are as unhappy as you about the merger, especially with CAL. 9 hrs between reserve assignments? coach seats for rest facilities? What a joke. We once shut down ORD-HNL for 2 years because the company would not provide an adequate rest facility. They were offering a first class seat. COACH SEATS? You guys are the Mesa of the majors. XJT has better work rules. Yeah, I feel entitled. Give it a rest.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
67
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
23
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
EWR73FO
United
170
02-11-2011 11:10 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices