Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
When will you ever have more leverage,VOTE NO >

When will you ever have more leverage,VOTE NO

Search

Notices

When will you ever have more leverage,VOTE NO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2012 | 07:11 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
Don't pay any attention to somebody with 47 posts. DirectLaw joined recently and everything he writes is saying how we should vote yes. One of Jeff's girls planted to post this stuff. Vote NO.
Go Heels!....
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 07:17 AM
  #42  
reCALcitrant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Default

Heel yea!......
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 07:19 AM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by reCALcitrant
Don't pay any attention to somebody with 47 posts. DirectLaw joined recently and everything he writes is saying how we should vote yes. One of Jeff's girls planted to post this stuff. Vote NO.
Notice how nobody ever attacks my arguments.
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 07:22 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirectLawOnly
Scope? Are you kidding me? Have you even read it? You'd rather stay under s-CAL scope or s-UAL scope?

Allow me to summarize the current scope WRT regional jets.
700+ rjs! That equates to a solar eclipse flying over my house. I can't wait until UCH goes over the 153 76/90 seat jet limit and so they can purchase shiny new SNB jets for the mainline. I'm not holding my breath.

Do we want to talk about the unlimited ability to start domestic code shares?
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 07:23 AM
  #45  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by DirectLawOnly
There is exactly one work rule that is worse. Involuntary Junior Manning. The chance that it actually happens, let alone actually happens to you, and you are too dim witted to refuse and think of a viable excuse by the time a flight manager calls you is very slim.

Scope? Are you kidding me? Have you even read it? You'd rather stay under s-CAL scope or s-UAL scope?

Allow me to summarize the current scope WRT regional jets.

CAL - UNLIMITED BLOCK HOURS to be flown by RJ's. UNLIMITED! Think about that for a moment. An RJ formula that beginning in 2005 allows the company to fly 3 more RJ's for every narrow body airplane and 5 more for every wide body airplane. NO HARD CAP ON NUMBER OF RJ's. NONE!

UAL - UNLIMITED RJ's. Limited only by 100% of SYSTEM WIDE block hours. Narrow body hours, wide body hours, domestic hours, international hours, if mainline buys a fleet of C-172's and flies them, then Express can match them hour for hour.

Go ahead and vote your angry NO then crawl back under your self righteous rock.
Considering Bombardier and Embraer have shuttered new 50 seat jet production, and, as a complete industry segment are at the end of their financial service lives, and CALs scope prevented jets greater than 50 seat jets....... I'd keep CAL's.

Pontificate if you will about the dreaded Q400s but there are currently 14 in UAX service with a total of 32 being slowly brought online from Colgan and Lynx to RAH.
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 07:28 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirectLawOnly
Notice how nobody ever attacks my arguments.
Here's a thought for you Chief.

Heppner/Pierce may have brought "you" an acceptable contract, but what they have brought to all of us is a deeply fractured pilot group. This I'm afraid, will never heal.
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 08:05 AM
  #47  
DaveNelson's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Captain, IAH
Default

Originally Posted by northshore973
What did Bethune publicly say back in C97. He had plenty more ready to offer to the pilots. He was even publicly quoted saying he couldn't believe the pilots voted in the first offer. The company would never come to the table without a backup offer.Don't sell out,go back to the negotiating table and set the bar higher.

The company is using scare tactics to get this thing through.They need this to be over with as soon as possible and will come back to the table to make it work. You can't ask for any more leverage.
Would you care to share the source in which Gordon was "publicly quoted" saying such? Can you provide a link to the article or video in which he said this?

Here's a social media dialogue I had with Mr. Bethune a while back. Of course, I know I'm stirring a hornet's nest by challenging one of the Continental pilots' most cherished urban myths. Hammer away at me personally, if you wish. But, can you furnish that link?

Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 08:17 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DirectLawOnly
There is exactly one work rule that is worse. Involuntary Junior Manning. The chance that it actually happens, let alone actually happens to you, and you are too dim witted to refuse and think of a viable excuse by the time a flight manager calls you is very slim.

Scope? Are you kidding me? Have you even read it? You'd rather stay under s-CAL scope or s-UAL scope?

Allow me to summarize the current scope WRT regional jets.

CAL - UNLIMITED BLOCK HOURS to be flown by RJ's. UNLIMITED! Think about that for a moment. An RJ formula that beginning in 2005 allows the company to fly 3 more RJ's for every narrow body airplane and 5 more for every wide body airplane. NO HARD CAP ON NUMBER OF RJ's. NONE!

UAL - UNLIMITED RJ's. Limited only by 100% of SYSTEM WIDE block hours. Narrow body hours, wide body hours, domestic hours, international hours, if mainline buys a fleet of C-172's and flies them, then Express can match them hour for hour.

Go ahead and vote your angry NO then crawl back under your self righteous rock.
Why do u think mgmt is so desperate to get out from CALs scope clause?? Best in industry right now. Any other airline pilots would love to have this. It handcuffs them completely.

I hope you realize that with this contract you will see almost none of ALPAs highlights for 9-18 months. That's right, half of what they are saying is so great wont kick in for a long time. So you will have to suffer under a significantly sub par contract for a large portion of the 4 years, great deal.
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 08:27 AM
  #49  
DaveNelson's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: B-737 Captain, IAH
Default

Originally Posted by thor2j
Why do u think mgmt is so desperate to get out from CALs scope clause?? Best in industry right now. Any other airline pilots would love to have this. It handcuffs them completely.
While there are technically some block-hour-ratio constraints (between metal flown by UA and CO pilots that remain valid in CAL's scope clause, the fact is that the 50-seat jet limitation in the CAL contract is no longer valid.

That went away with the I.T. changeover to the UA code. Since no United flights use the CO code these days, the most cherished aspect of the CAL scope clause has gone away. There is no 50-seat limitation on jets. There never was one on large turboprops.

United is now constrained only by the 70-seat jet clause in the legacy UA contract, one that allows an unlimited number of such jets, constrained only by a block hour (one to one) ratio between UAX and all mainline flying.

The most attractive feature of CAL's scope clause is no longer applicable.
Reply
Old 12-03-2012 | 08:23 PM
  #50  
reCALcitrant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Default

Don't need to. You have no history or credibility on this forum.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices