Search
Notices

Profit Sharing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2013, 07:46 AM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

So anyway, I ask for 100% of the check to be put into my 401k. WTH did they take fed, socsec, and med out? Does asking for 100% be put in the 401k before tax not actually mean that?
EWR73FO is offline  
Old 02-14-2013, 07:50 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Tax free was the purpose for putting it in the 401k. Payroll strikes again.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 02-14-2013, 11:24 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
A320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 638
Default

Originally Posted by 6blade View Post
Oh yea... another entitlement. Another lawsuit... geezzzz

Everyone better count all the sprinkles on the ice cream they hand out tomorrow cuz if I get too many sprinkles... (another lawsuit)

Whaaaaaaaaa mommy.....
You are just still upset about the December vote
A320 is offline  
Old 02-14-2013, 01:55 PM
  #24  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO View Post
So anyway, I ask for 100% of the check to be put into my 401k. WTH did they take fed, socsec, and med out? Does asking for 100% be put in the 401k before tax not actually mean that?
Just out of curiosity, was the 401k in which you were deferring to, was it a "ROTH 401k"? If so, 'front side' taxes make sense in that case. Outside of that, I'd have not a clue as to why they pulled the taxes (Fed) on the front side when you elected 100% deferment to the "vanilla/traditional" 401k.

Look into it and let me know what you find out.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 02-14-2013, 05:18 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy View Post
Just out of curiosity, was the 401k in which you were deferring to, was it a "ROTH 401k"? If so, 'front side' taxes make sense in that case. Outside of that, I'd have not a clue as to why they pulled the taxes (Fed) on the front side when you elected 100% deferment to the "vanilla/traditional" 401k.

Look into it and let me know what you find out.

Nope. Pure 401K. When you elect 100% into my 401k, you would think that it would mean 100%, less union dues. Called crew pay and they said talk to payroll. Here I was thinking they were all in the same room and department. I just found somewhat or part of an answer. Still doesn't explain the federal withholding though.



I want to contribute 100% of my 2012 Profit Sharing, on a Before-Tax basis, to my company-sponsored retirement savings account.

EXPLINATION

Before-Tax Contributions
Generally, you may contribute from 1% up to 100% of your Profit Sharing check to your company-sponsored retirement savings account on a before-tax basis. For U.S. retirement savings accounts, you may make contributions up to the elective deferral limit – for 2013, $17,500 or $23,000 for someone age 50 or older. Employee contributions from profit sharing are not eligible for subsidiary United matching contributions. Your before-tax contributions are deducted before federal and certain state income withholding taxes are computed (not all states are included). However, these contributions will be subject to Social Security (6.2%), Medicare (1.45%), and applicable state and local tax withholdings.
EWR73FO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
Coach67
United
18
01-05-2012 06:54 PM
alfaromeo
Major
132
01-24-2011 09:48 AM
Indy
Major
7
12-06-2010 01:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices