![]() |
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
(Post 1391469)
And NONE of the above matters. The contract came in December 2012 and the Merger Acquisiton Date was in 2010. When CAL 2007 hires had 3 years longevity and everyone on the UAL list had more.
|
2010 UCH Financials
UAL: $4.7B cash/equivalents, 1.629B cash flow CAL: $3.4B cash/equivalents, 852M cash flow Form 10-K |
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 1391603)
2010 UCH Financials
UAL: $4.7B cash/equivalents, 1.629B cash flow CAL: $3.4B cash/equivalents, 852M cash flow Form 10-K |
Originally Posted by A320
(Post 1391753)
Wow. I didn't realize that LUAL was in such bad shape compared to LCAL before the merger.
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 1391603)
2010 UCH Financials
UAL: $4.7B cash/equivalents, 1.629B cash flow CAL: $3.4B cash/equivalents, 852M cash flow Form 10-K |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1391770)
And Dec 2009?
|
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
(Post 1391788)
Doesn't matter. 2010 was the Snapshot for longevity, financials, etc.
|
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
(Post 1391788)
Doesn't matter. 2010 was the Snapshot for longevity, financials, etc.
|
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1391860)
And 2009?
It does matter. A lot. By the end of 2010 the creditor wolves had been fended off by the promise of CAL passenger service and CAL management righting a sinking ship (note, the latest 14th out of 14 shows how wrong that notion was). The end of 2009 would more accurately show the health of each company, independently, before merger announcement. BTW, I don't know what it would show, but whatever it shows it would be pre-merger therefore more constructive for the health-of-company-equates-to-career-expectations issue. UAL: cash/equivalents $3.036B, $1.003B cash flow CAL: cash/equivalents $2.546B, $381M cash flow Form 10-K pp. 88, 93 |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1391860)
It does matter. A lot. By the end of 2010 the creditor wolves had been fended off by the promise of CAL passenger service and CAL management righting a sinking ship (note, the latest 14th out of 14 shows how wrong that notion was). The end of 2009 would more accurately show the health of each company, independently, before merger announcement. BTW, I don't know what it would show, but whatever it shows it would be pre-merger therefore more constructive for the health-of-company-equates-to-career-expectations issue.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands