Search

Notices

Political Posturing -

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2013 | 02:19 AM
  #231  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Stoops
There is far less history of a 1:1 slotting and staple the rest that Cal proposed. It literally addressed 1/2 of 1 of the 3 basic tenets of the current ALPA merger policy. We'll know soon enough what the arbs thought of each sides argument.
I could care less what folks use to judge the awards fairness (2010, 2012, 2013, current, hell, why not 5 years from now?) The arb's don't either. What there is is precedence, and the setting of precedence for future awards. It won't crush either side, it will simply normalize it to what actually happened when the two companies merged in 2010. Take away delay, divert and leverage and we have 2010 when one management team in a legal sense started making decisions about fleet makeup, structure and staffing.

Scott
Why then didn't that management team bring the 600ish jobs to the L-UAL side?

Merger policy "tenants"? ... What will you do if the award looks more like the CAL proposal, and not like the UAL proposal? What crosses the fairness threshold for you?
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 04:34 AM
  #232  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA
Why then didn't that management team bring the 600ish jobs to the L-UAL side?

Merger policy "tenants"? ... What will you do if the award looks more like the CAL proposal, and not like the UAL proposal? What crosses the fairness threshold for you?
I know of one lawsuit already in the works and it's not coming from the group you'd expect.

Please tell us when the Continental business plan will be complete so the current airline can operate as one. Many of us need to plan our lives.
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 08:01 AM
  #233  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA
Why then didn't that management team bring the 600ish jobs to the L-UAL side?
For the obvious reason that hiring a new pilot off the street under the CAL work rules was cheaper than recalling a furloughee who may be on 8th year pay under the UAL work rules and higher overall compensation plan.

Management chose the cheapest solution.
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 08:05 AM
  #234  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by Skyflyin
No, what would be fair, IMO, is to count longevity for ALL pilots, both CAL and UAL through April 2013.
That's even better for the furloughees who returned. It puts some of them up to 9 years of longevity because they are back at United now, accumulating longevity and recalled.

You can't have it both ways. You can't claim longevity to April 2013 then say the furloughees haven't been recalled to the United side so their time on property doesn't count.
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 08:23 AM
  #235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by SEDPA

Merger policy "tenants"? ... What will you do if the award looks more like the CAL proposal, and not like the UAL proposal? What crosses the fairness threshold for you?
Longevity. Status and Category. Career expectations. Those "tenants". I suspect your side's kindergarten proposal will be chucked in the can, and my 1997 proposed stapled arse will be senior to at least 1/3 of your airline. Along with the nearly 1000 other 1997 hires. Watch and see.

Sled
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 08:31 AM
  #236  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
Longevity. Status and Category. Career expectations. Those "tenants". I suspect your side's kindergarten proposal will be chucked in the can, and my 1997 proposed stapled arse will be senior to at least 1/3 of your airline. Along with the nearly 1000 other 1997 hires. Watch and see.

Sled
Sled,

You do realize that strictly based on longevity you are senior to 50% of Continental pilots...

Its a shame that you might only end up senior to 1/3 of them.

LAX
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 08:51 AM
  #237  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
For the obvious reason that hiring a new pilot off the street under the CAL work rules was cheaper than recalling a furloughee who may be on 8th year pay under the UAL work rules and higher overall compensation plan.

Management chose the cheapest solution.
That's exactly what US Airways management did (read: former AWA management). The West had 141 airplanes and 1900 pilots when the AWA-AAA merger was announced and the East had 1600 pilots on furlough. Now, the West has 122 airframes, the East has gotten 9 additional A330s, and all the hiring has been on the East and all the furloughs have been on the West. There's one reason: the East making $124 an hour as Group II CA and virtually no work rules were cheaper.
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 09:09 AM
  #238  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Sled,

You do realize that strictly based on longevity you are senior to 50% of Continental pilots...

Its a shame that you might only end up senior to 1/3 of them.

LAX
For you LAX,

Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 09:21 AM
  #239  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

^^^ AWWW... How sweet of you.
Reply
Old 07-22-2013 | 09:23 AM
  #240  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by aquagreen73s
That's exactly what US Airways management did (read: former AWA management). The West had 141 airplanes and 1900 pilots when the AWA-AAA merger was announced and the East had 1600 pilots on furlough. Now, the West has 122 airframes, the East has gotten 9 additional A330s, and all the hiring has been on the East and all the furloughs have been on the West. There's one reason: the East making $124 an hour as Group II CA and virtually no work rules were cheaper.
Exactly. And CAL tried to make their inferior contract a selling point for SLI. Well its just about over and rightly so. About time to spread the wealth, and not just to the cheaper pilot group.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
1
04-21-2011 09:56 PM
Copperhed51
Hangar Talk
14
05-02-2010 09:41 AM
767pilot
Cargo
115
10-15-2009 06:19 PM
A320fumes
Major
11
09-17-2008 03:24 PM
Young Jack
Cargo
2
02-12-2008 08:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices