One more dung slinging session before ISL!
08-24-2013 | 05:25 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Only 1 more week to sling "this" dung. After that hopefully we can target the proper enemy a little better.
SENIORITY LIST UPDATE
The CAL and UAL MECs have received word from the arbitrators that they are on track to complete the Integrated Seniority List (ISL) in approximately one week. While there can be no guarantees that the ISL will be complete within seven days, the CAL and UAL MECs are making preparations to be in session late next week in the event that the ISL is received from the arbitrators. We will keep you informed should we receive further word.
SENIORITY LIST UPDATE
The CAL and UAL MECs have received word from the arbitrators that they are on track to complete the Integrated Seniority List (ISL) in approximately one week. While there can be no guarantees that the ISL will be complete within seven days, the CAL and UAL MECs are making preparations to be in session late next week in the event that the ISL is received from the arbitrators. We will keep you informed should we receive further word.
08-24-2013 | 05:52 AM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
08-24-2013 | 07:34 AM
#43
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
08-24-2013 | 08:46 AM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Captain
CAL version of UNITY. This is one reason we need to make sure these bums don't get re-elected or appointed to any ALPA position going forward.
What is the name of this fine CAL LEC vice-chairman?
08-24-2013 | 09:06 AM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
08-24-2013 | 09:12 AM
#47
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Was the individual(s) being "disruptive", not following "Robert's Rules", "Obstructive", Not in "good Union standing", ect......What was the reason for them being "asked" to leave??
I don't care who you are (Legacy 'whoever'), if an individual(s) is displaying/acting in such an obstructive manner, I would expect the situation to be rectified. If that means having those displaying such behavior/standing being asked to comply with the bounds/rules of an official LEC meeting, or leave, so be it.
I would like to hear some of the actual surrounding facts of the allegations above.
Thanks for bringing that up.
08-24-2013 | 09:16 AM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: Captain
08-24-2013 | 09:29 AM
#49
Peace Love Understanding
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
I had not heard about that.....What Council was it??
Was the individual(s) being "disruptive", not following "Robert's Rules", "Obstructive", Not in "good Union standing", ect......What was the reason for them being "asked" to leave??
I don't care who you are (Legacy 'whoever'), if an individual(s) is displaying/acting in such an obstructive manner, I would expect the situation to be rectified. If that means having those displaying such behavior/standing being asked to comply with the bounds/rules of an official LEC meeting, or leave, so be it.
I would like to hear some of the actual surrounding facts of the allegations above.
Thanks for bringing that up.
Was the individual(s) being "disruptive", not following "Robert's Rules", "Obstructive", Not in "good Union standing", ect......What was the reason for them being "asked" to leave??
I don't care who you are (Legacy 'whoever'), if an individual(s) is displaying/acting in such an obstructive manner, I would expect the situation to be rectified. If that means having those displaying such behavior/standing being asked to comply with the bounds/rules of an official LEC meeting, or leave, so be it.
I would like to hear some of the actual surrounding facts of the allegations above.
Thanks for bringing that up.
And also apparently they left without making a big deal.
The funny thing is I'm sure there are ex-scabs who were let back into ALPA when it reformed who were allowed to stay and listen.
So I guess at CAL the unions only represent some of the pilots and not all of them.
You gotta wonder about a union that lets scabs stay in the meeting and throws out pilots who not only never crossed a picket line, AND who have been through a furlough.
08-24-2013 | 09:36 AM
#50
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Apparently someone asked what happens if the ISL looks more like the UAL list does the CAL side have any recourse, so they asked the L-UAL guys to leave so they could discuss it without them.
And also apparently they left without making a big deal.
The funny thing is I'm sure there are ex-scabs who were let back into ALPA when it reformed who were allowed to stay and listen.
So I guess at CAL the unions only represent some of the pilots and not all of them.
You gotta wonder about a union that lets scabs stay in the meeting and throws out pilots who not only never crossed a picket line, AND who have been through a furlough.
And also apparently they left without making a big deal.
The funny thing is I'm sure there are ex-scabs who were let back into ALPA when it reformed who were allowed to stay and listen.
So I guess at CAL the unions only represent some of the pilots and not all of them.
You gotta wonder about a union that lets scabs stay in the meeting and throws out pilots who not only never crossed a picket line, AND who have been through a furlough.
Saw this from Ben on anther thread. May want to converse with the V/C (or S/T) directly to see if he'd put a "brief" in writing since the above said actions would have to be held w/in the minutes of an official LEC meeting.
It would be a nice litmus test to see if "one" get's a returned phone call.....Rumor has it that some within the current Council are not too good at returning phone requests, even for those who they directly represent.....just saying.
Not my council, so I won't speak to it. Contact Rob Slovitski, NYC Vice-Chair.
I will say that procedurally, in IAH, we always request a motion from the floor to admit non-iah members, usually for wives or members from other councils. We've always gotten that motion, and NO IAH Pilot (LUAL included) have ever objected to admitting and wife, child, LCAL or LUAL member.
That's is how we handle it in IAH.
Over-and Out.
-Ben
I will say that procedurally, in IAH, we always request a motion from the floor to admit non-iah members, usually for wives or members from other councils. We've always gotten that motion, and NO IAH Pilot (LUAL included) have ever objected to admitting and wife, child, LCAL or LUAL member.
That's is how we handle it in IAH.
Over-and Out.
-Ben
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
