Thank you Mr. Katz!
09-03-2013, 09:01 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Thank you Mr. Katz!
Your arguments were totally off and the arbitrators ignored your list COMPLETELY (just like I predicted they would).
The CAL SLI team accomplished nothing and were totally ignored.
The list still sucks, but I take some comfort in the fact that our lawyers controlled the methodology of the final product.
(Nothing against the CAL guys as a whole...just taking a shot at your goofy leaders).
IN UNITY!!!
The CAL SLI team accomplished nothing and were totally ignored.
The list still sucks, but I take some comfort in the fact that our lawyers controlled the methodology of the final product.
(Nothing against the CAL guys as a whole...just taking a shot at your goofy leaders).
IN UNITY!!!
09-03-2013, 09:10 PM
#3
Peace Love Understanding
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Airbus
Posts: 1,040
Originally Posted by ERJ Jay
Yep 77% to 88 % that's fair and equitable?
If it wasn't for Chase Manhattan, UAL would be another grave stone on the airline landscape.
Oh well.
If it wasn't for Chase Manhattan, UAL would be another grave stone on the airline landscape.
Oh well.
09-03-2013, 09:17 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
But UAL is still here and CAL isn't.
I guess success does has it's downfalls.
BTW, check the FAA certification, CAL is the surviving carrier.
Not that it matters.
09-03-2013, 09:18 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 169
Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
But UAL is still here and CAL isn't.
09-03-2013, 09:22 PM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by All In
ERJ Jay
trying to understand your statement.
what percentage were you on the date of merger?
what percentage are you with the SLI awarded today?
trying to understand your statement.
what percentage were you on the date of merger?
what percentage are you with the SLI awarded today?
That's pretty much it.
Out of work pilot's being placed before actively working pilots.
Yep, that's fair and equitable.
09-03-2013, 09:23 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 169
Originally Posted by ERJ Jay
I was employed, everyone forloughed from UAL was not.
That's pretty much it.
Out of work pilot's being placed before actively working pilots.
Yep, that's fair and equitable.
That's pretty much it.
Out of work pilot's being placed before actively working pilots.
Yep, that's fair and equitable.
09-03-2013, 09:29 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 294
Originally Posted by All In
ERJ Jay
trying to understand your statement.
what percentage were you on the date of merger?
what percentage are you with the SLI awarded today?
trying to understand your statement.
what percentage were you on the date of merger?
what percentage are you with the SLI awarded today?
That's pretty much it.
Out of work pilot's being placed before actively working pilots.
Yep, that's fair and equitable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
