Vacancy Bid 1404V
#81
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
CRM
History:
1978 a UAL DC8 crashed in PDX because it ran out of fuel. The reason? The Captain was so interested in being a hero he shut down his cockpit crew and let the airplane run out of fuel as he circled with 45 mins reserve fuel prepping the cabin for possible evac. The problem is with the gear down the DC8 didn't have 45 mins of fuel.
The FAA mandated CLR because of this "9 - 1" Captain crashed, killed many people and destroyed a perfectly good airplane.
The original CLR was a patented course taught at UAL emphasizing crew interaction and helping individuals identify their "style" of leadership and management. The current FAA mandated CRM is the evolution of this original course, but with little to no emphasis on personal recognition of leadership and management style. The "TEM," "Threat and Error Management," being taught at UAL today is merely a shell of the original program and fulfills FAA minimum mandated training.
Personally I see a return to the "McBroom" days of cockpit style where the F/O is considered just a "JFFO" by some "Buddys" who believe in their "superior" aviation skills and "experience."
But what do I know?
History:
1978 a UAL DC8 crashed in PDX because it ran out of fuel. The reason? The Captain was so interested in being a hero he shut down his cockpit crew and let the airplane run out of fuel as he circled with 45 mins reserve fuel prepping the cabin for possible evac. The problem is with the gear down the DC8 didn't have 45 mins of fuel.
The FAA mandated CLR because of this "9 - 1" Captain crashed, killed many people and destroyed a perfectly good airplane.
The original CLR was a patented course taught at UAL emphasizing crew interaction and helping individuals identify their "style" of leadership and management. The current FAA mandated CRM is the evolution of this original course, but with little to no emphasis on personal recognition of leadership and management style. The "TEM," "Threat and Error Management," being taught at UAL today is merely a shell of the original program and fulfills FAA minimum mandated training.
Personally I see a return to the "McBroom" days of cockpit style where the F/O is considered just a "JFFO" by some "Buddys" who believe in their "superior" aviation skills and "experience."
But what do I know?
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
From: A Nobody
BTW Not to leave the CAL folks out of history.
In the same era of the UAL DC8 a retiring CAL Captain aborted a TO in LAX for a blown tire (correct me please for the reason if I'm wrong) on his retirement flight in a DC10. The airplane left the pavement and damaged the fuel tank with a fire quickly following.
The flight attendants multiple times disarmed doors causing delays in evacuation with the finale PAX and Crew exiting the burning airplane via the cockpit windows and ropes. Because of this accident and crew failures the UAL FAs even today do not disarm and open doors as a normal practice. Think motor memory skills when the proverbial stuff hits the fan. "I always disarm before opening the door."
Of course today I believe its the pilots, who can open the doors, whom cause the majority of the accidental slide deployments.
In the same era of the UAL DC8 a retiring CAL Captain aborted a TO in LAX for a blown tire (correct me please for the reason if I'm wrong) on his retirement flight in a DC10. The airplane left the pavement and damaged the fuel tank with a fire quickly following.
The flight attendants multiple times disarmed doors causing delays in evacuation with the finale PAX and Crew exiting the burning airplane via the cockpit windows and ropes. Because of this accident and crew failures the UAL FAs even today do not disarm and open doors as a normal practice. Think motor memory skills when the proverbial stuff hits the fan. "I always disarm before opening the door."
Of course today I believe its the pilots, who can open the doors, whom cause the majority of the accidental slide deployments.
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Who needs Cap vacancies when you're planning on parking 70- 757s and 21- 767s in the next 2 years? UCH is delaying the inevitable (displacements) as long as possible to see how many chumps will jump ship voluntarily. But soon they will bump. And when they do, plenty of 737 CAP slots will be filled. Since they have not been posting vacancies and we still have many 737 future deliveries, very few if any existing 737 CAPs should need to be displaced. It's coming.
'Mind the Bump'
Sled
'Mind the Bump'
Sled
#88
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Who needs Cap vacancies when you're planning on parking 70- 757s and 21- 767s in the next 2 years? UCH is delaying the inevitable (displacements) as long as possible to see how many chumps will jump ship voluntarily. But soon they will bump. And when they do, plenty of 737 CAP slots will be filled. Since they have not been posting vacancies and we still have many 737 future deliveries, very few if any existing 737 CAPs should need to be displaced. It's coming.
'Mind the Bump'
Sled
'Mind the Bump'
Sled
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Sorry but no bumps, just controlled vacancies and displacements thru staffing, retirments, and growth. Captains would just slide to other junior captain bases causing endless number of paid moves costing Company big time. Never going to happen. Sorry but 05/06 Captains will be Captains for their entire career.
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Sorry but no bumps, just controlled vacancies and displacements thru staffing, retirments, and growth. Captains would just slide to other junior captain bases causing endless number of paid moves costing Company big time. Never going to happen. Sorry but 05/06 Captains will be Captains for their entire career.
If so, they are going to be on reserve their entire career.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



