Search

Notices

Scope Choke in Action

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2014 | 06:25 AM
  #31  
Sonny Crockett's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 3
From: B777
Default

[QUOTE=Coach67;1730831]
Originally Posted by AV82SKI

You are dead on. We just allowed the Company to increase the ASM's on RJ's . Those constantly trying to defend this sCOPE language fail to realize we permitted the Company to significantly increase the number of passengers flown by RJ's. Three 50 seaters parked is being hearlded by the sCOPE defenders as a win ... while they are replaced by two 76 seaters. A one for one exchange is a loss that we permitted.
I was screaming all this during the roadshows.......nobody would listen....just give me mo' money.....and sli......shiny new jets!

WE NEVER LEARN!
Reply
Old 09-20-2014 | 07:34 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
Default

As a former Regional Pilot, I implore our collective pilot groups to take back scope!!! I firmly believe scope is the primary issue for our contract negotiations. Scope is our jobs!!! We have no one to blame other than ourselves for this mess. Management knows and understands that pilots are greedy and concerned about getting "theirs". We need to understand that and use that to our advantage. We at the Legacy/Major level have the power to change things. We just have to not be selfish and pay it forward for the future of our profession.
Reply
Old 09-20-2014 | 07:45 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
I would like to bring in Exhibit A sir: (Keep in mind Skywest owns nearly all the UAX 50 seaters.)


In the second half of 2014, SkyWest expects 56 of its unprofitable 50-seat aircraft contracts will naturally expire and the aircraft will be returned to lessors. SkyWest also expects an additional 101 unprofitable 50-seat aircraft contracts will naturally expire and be removed from service by December 31, 2015.


Does it delineate anywhere in the SKW report that these 50 seaters are coming out of the UAX fleet OR out of DELTA CONNECTIO, or perhaps a mix?
Given Delta's pace of getting rid of the 50 seaters, I would be VERY hestitant to assume that they are all UAX parkings.
Reply
Old 09-20-2014 | 08:35 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Coach67;1730831]
Originally Posted by AV82SKI

You are dead on. We just allowed the Company to increase the ASM's on RJ's . Those constantly trying to defend this sCOPE language fail to realize we permitted the Company to significantly increase the number of passengers flown by RJ's. Three 50 seaters parked is being hearlded by the sCOPE defenders as a win ... while they are replaced by two 76 seaters. A one for one exchange is a loss that we permitted.
Can you please post the source where you got this info from. I will not quote it as fact but, I believe the ASM's are actually going down on the Express carriers according to the last companies last quarter report?
Reply
Old 09-20-2014 | 09:18 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Default

Yes that is true...ASM's are reducing! It is scope choke...loosing 2 50-seaters for ever 70-76. The latest announcement is an airframe for airframe replacement (70 seat for 76 seat), but RJ ASM is reducing overall
Reply
Old 09-21-2014 | 08:11 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
Talk about spin. Explain to me how going from 557 planes to 255 planes in the UAX fleet over a 6 year period is a loss even if the seats go from 50 to 76 which is not wholly accurate because the fleet already had 100+ 70 seaters.
Originally Posted by AV82SKI
Just one correction to your fleet facts. The express fleet is not shrinking to 255 aircraft. Our scope currently restricts the 70/76 seat fleet to a total of 255 aircraft. UAL can have an unlimited number of 50 seaters as long as they stay under the 120% block hour restriction. At the end of 2014 the express fleet will still have 557 airplanes.
That is a net loss of 15 airframes for the year. The 50 seaters may be on the way out but the fleet is not being scoped down to 255 airframes.
If only UAX fleet was going to be 255 after six years.

It is easy to understand how pilots forget what the actual 'Scope Choke' was due to the absurd complexity of the language. The 'Scope Choke' was supposedly going to happen because United would have to order mainline 100 seat SJs to compete with DAL. Even if United announces an order for such aircraft, deliveries won't come until well after DAL's new contract happens. Historically, DALPA has sold SJ scope for contractual improvements. Hopefully, that trend will end, but if it doesn't the UAL MEC will likely follow suit with another DAL - 1 year contract like last time.

The UAX carriers' inability to find pilots who will work for minimum wage compensation is the only factor choking regional growth. It certainly has nothing to do with the UPA scope clause.

Last edited by Flytolive; 09-21-2014 at 08:25 AM.
Reply
Old 09-21-2014 | 08:35 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ewr756drive
Yes that is true...ASM's are reducing! It is scope choke...loosing 2 50-seaters for ever 70-76. The latest announcement is an airframe for airframe replacement (70 seat for 76 seat), but RJ ASM is reducing overall
ASMs went down slightly in Q2 and are projected to flatten in Q3 and it has NOTHING to do with the UPA scope clause nor does it require UAX to park '2 50-seaters for ever 70-76. That doesn't start until after the 255th UAX 70/76 seaters and the mainline 100 seaters start entering the fleet. UAX isn't even bumping up against the only applicable UPA limit at this point which is the 120% hour restriction. The limiting factor currently is the number of pilots UAX carriers can find who are willing to work for minimum wage. UAX has less than 20 E-175s so far. As more of those come on line UAX ASMs will likely increase due to more seats, higher speeds and higher utilization rates.
Reply
Old 09-21-2014 | 12:25 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default Scope Choke in Action

Originally Posted by boxer6
Does it delineate anywhere in the SKW report that these 50 seaters are coming out of the UAX fleet OR out of DELTA CONNECTIO, or perhaps a mix?

Given Delta's pace of getting rid of the 50 seaters, I would be VERY hestitant to assume that they are all UAX parkings.

According to their earnings call, Skywest Inc will lose 156 airplanes by YE 2015.

This year's remaining year TOTAL 56:
4-skywest, 17-ASA, 35 XJT

Next year TOTAL 100:
21-skywest , 20-ASA, 59-XJT

All of the XJT aircraft are UAX and at least a dozen or so from ASA are UAX aircraft with the balance being DelCon. I don't know about Skywest.



Said there will still be 155-160 Legacy XJT aircraft on property end of 2015



Originally Posted by DashTrash
As a former Regional Pilot, I implore our collective pilot groups to take back scope!!! I firmly believe scope is the primary issue for our contract negotiations. Scope is our jobs!!! We have no one to blame other than ourselves for this mess. Management knows and understands that pilots are greedy and concerned about getting "theirs". We need to understand that and use that to our advantage. We at the Legacy/Major level have the power to change things. We just have to not be selfish and pay it forward for the future of our profession.

As a current regional pilot, I implore all mainline pilots to take back both ends of scope. That's the scope choke to worry about!
Reply
Old 09-22-2014 | 09:52 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Not for nuthin' but Southwest is running national TV ads that when you buy a seat on them you fly on a mainline plane.
Reply
Old 09-22-2014 | 02:31 PM
  #40  
Sunvox's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: UAL retired
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
If only UAX fleet was going to be 255 after six years.



The UAX carriers' inability to find pilots who will work for minimum wage compensation is the only factor choking regional growth. It certainly has nothing to do with the UPA scope clause.
You are right it won't be 255 in 6 years that is overstating the case, however, it does not change the fact that the 50 seat planes are ALL slated to go the way of the Dodo bird by 2025, AND it is highly likely they will be put to rest before that SO . . .

WITH NO OTHER CHANGES

Scope CHOKES (i.e. limits) the number of jet airframes to 255. Long before the trouble finding qualified pilots started the economics of 50 seaters had already proven their demise and that was part of ALPAs argument. I am not saying the job is over and we should all breath a sigh of relief. All I am saying is that the "doomsday" sayers who argued that the company was going to keep the 50 seat fleet and grow the new UAX to 700 planes strong were simply wrong and now the trend is going in the opposite direction and it is directly the result of ALPA limiting the future UAX fleet to 255. What happens now will determine whether we can take back all our flying but at least we have momentum in the right direction and for once its ok to be a little bit optimistic.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAL EWR
United
67
11-25-2012 03:46 PM
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Bucking Bar
Major
143
09-05-2009 04:39 PM
av8rmike
Cargo
36
09-16-2006 10:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices