Search

Notices

737-900 Wow!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2014, 03:31 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheapTrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: A350
Posts: 629
Default

I do remember the instructor in L10 school showing us why you couldn't lose all the hydraulics with a single point failure. You guys remember systems classes right?
CheapTrick is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 07:32 AM
  #162  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I heard a quote from a Boeing engineer I met.

"The perfect aircraft would be designed by Lockheed, built by Boeing, and marketed by McDonnell Douglas."

Maybe if they put a little wheel on the bottom of the new winglets, we won't scrape so many off.

Oh wait, didn't we try something like that recently on an approach into EWR?
Probe is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 07:34 AM
  #163  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

And maybe another little wheel on the aft lower fuselage?
Probe is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 08:17 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BeenThere's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 153
Default

[QUOTE=sailingfun;1606736]
Originally Posted by XHooker
Not saying you're wrong, but the only thing I can think of off the top of my head that was a design problem was the hydraulic line placement that caused the UAL Sioux City mishap and even that might have been just a freak accident that could have happened to the L1011.

Doubtful it could have happened to a L1011. It had 4 hyd systems instead of 3 and one of them was fused to isolate the tail in case of a explosion in the number 2 engine. Hyd line routines were also split unlike the ten.
Seems I recall at least two L1011 hull losses due to hydraulic system fires in the tail section--a Saudia flight that managed to land but burned on the runway, and a Pakistani jet lost in a hangar fire.

There are no perfect airplanes.
BeenThere is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 08:59 PM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I heard a quote from a Boeing engineer I met.

"The perfect aircraft would be designed by Lockheed, built by Boeing, and marketed by McDonnell Douglas."

Maybe if they put a little wheel on the bottom of the new winglets, we won't scrape so many off.

Oh wait, didn't we try something like that recently on an approach into EWR?
From an old salt.....

Boeing builds airplanes.
Douglas builds character.
Lockhead builds class.
SOTeric is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 09:01 PM
  #166  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by liveupthere
Fifi's cockpit was designed by laid-off McDonnell Douglas engineers...
Must have gotten laid off because they were wanting to make it more comfortable and ergonomic than MD was willing to spend money on.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 03-28-2014, 03:26 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,388
Default

[QUOTE=BeenThere;1607219]
Originally Posted by sailingfun

Seems I recall at least two L1011 hull losses due to hydraulic system fires in the tail section--a Saudia flight that managed to land but burned on the runway, and a Pakistani jet lost in a hangar fire.

There are no perfect airplanes.
The Saudi flight was a cargo fire in the aft cargo hold. The Captain took his time landing and even sent the FE back to confirm the smoke before turning back even though they had a aft fire cargo indication and the flight attendants reported smoke in the cabin. They landed with the pressurization in standby and the outflow valve closed for reasons not known. Took 23 minutes to get the first door open and all on board died.
There is no record of the Pakistani aircraft you mentioned however a L1011 burned in a hangar in Europe. The fire was started while welding the aircraft.

Last edited by sailingfun; 03-28-2014 at 03:43 AM.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 04:46 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,408
Default

No dog in the fight, but I was riding BWI-DEN and they blocked 34 seat. United sent me over to American, so I don't know if the restriction was later lifted.




Originally Posted by Knotcher
After flying it for the last three years, I have been weight restricted once due to approach climb limit/icing in DEN, 15 seats blocked, which was later removed at push. Also a couple times departing Quito. Other than that, never.

Never been weight restricted for an alternate, or even a short runway because they don't send 900s to runways less than 7000. The water cooler stories of 50 seats blocked are mostly bunk..maybe a Hawaii here or there, but those represent 1% of the operation.
jonnyjetprop is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 05:58 AM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Even IF it only represents 1% of the operation, that's one percent too much. Put the right plane on the right route and in the right market. That's a managerial task that these guys seem to fail with regularity.

That one percent represents thousands of pax and tons of cargo year out, year in. What a great way to run the operation. Lots of blown revenue, much of it never to return due to anger. Ten bucks says that any one of those bumped pax wouldn't have such a cavalier attitude and would vote with their wallet.

In response to squandered revenue, El Heffe wants to whack 2B in costs. Unless things start to turn, I submit that the'll be asking for concessions within the next 24 months. Right around the time we gin up for the next contract.
oldmako is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 06:27 AM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,717
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako

In response to squandered revenue, El Heffe wants to whack 2B in costs. Unless things start to turn, I submit that the'll be asking for concessions within the next 24 months. Right around the time we gin up for the next contract.

James be talking like he seen this all before or something!
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
GoCats67
United
8
09-13-2013 12:07 PM
Lerxst
United
171
02-05-2013 06:58 AM
1Seat 1Engine
Major
11
06-15-2007 05:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices