737-900 Wow!
#33
At delta they only fly the 764 as a single type. They don't mix in the 757 or 763 so they are much more proficient. To be honest I don't know what the tail strike angle is on the 763 compared to the 764 as I have only flown the 762 and the 764. I can tell you that performance wise and pilot friendliness especially on landings that the 764 is nothing like the 762.
As far as the 739 is concerned I had said that boeing should have stopped at the 738. New design was needed instead they wanted a cheap alternative, hence the 739. Went to the boeing factory this summer and they were touting the 739 as a replacement for the 752. I interjected and said that maybe it holds as many passengers but performance and capability between the two are light years apart! So then I asked when boeing would come up with a comparable replacement for the 757. Crickets......
As far as the 739 is concerned I had said that boeing should have stopped at the 738. New design was needed instead they wanted a cheap alternative, hence the 739. Went to the boeing factory this summer and they were touting the 739 as a replacement for the 752. I interjected and said that maybe it holds as many passengers but performance and capability between the two are light years apart! So then I asked when boeing would come up with a comparable replacement for the 757. Crickets......
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: FO
It's management's job to push the envelope in terms of revenue efficiency. The reality is, until someone consistently runs a -900 off a runway, they will just expect the pilots to cope with whatever operational challenges exist. Good luck, and thanks for playing
#37
I flew the -900ER for a few years in the left seat. It wasn't my favorite version but I don't remember it ever being scary or that difficult to manage. Since it's launch the -900ER has booked over 500 orders and has seen a total of 0 Hull losses. It might be a bit harder to fly but it's far from dangerous.
Last edited by Toddnel; 02-24-2014 at 08:03 PM.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Keep in mind the 900 has higher ref speeds than the 900-ER. The ER has the improvements that allow a slower ref speed.
I too have flown both the Airbus and the new gen 737s. The bus is a far better airplane to work in from a pilot's perspective. Given the choice with all things equal (pay, seniority) I'd take the airbus hands down.
I too have flown both the Airbus and the new gen 737s. The bus is a far better airplane to work in from a pilot's perspective. Given the choice with all things equal (pay, seniority) I'd take the airbus hands down.
#39
Keep in mind the 900 has higher ref speeds than the 900-ER. The ER has the improvements that allow a slower ref speed.
I too have flown both the Airbus and the new gen 737s. The bus is a far better airplane to work in from a pilot's perspective. Given the choice with all things equal (pay, seniority) I'd take the airbus hands down.
I too have flown both the Airbus and the new gen 737s. The bus is a far better airplane to work in from a pilot's perspective. Given the choice with all things equal (pay, seniority) I'd take the airbus hands down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



