Profit Sharing Grievance
03-15-2014 | 05:38 AM
#152
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
Where would we be today without the UPA? That is the answer. 67% caved, gave up, crossed the bargaining line, cowled, voted yes because _______ ... I am certain that the breakdown of the vote would show that the UPA didn't pass on the LCAL side. Sorry, if you voted yes, you own it ... I have to live with it ... a common theme now for us ex-LCAL now UCH UAL pilots.
03-15-2014 | 05:40 AM
#153
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Sorry, I was on topic. Many, if not most voted yes to stop the seniority grab of the first three years. Those who voted yes, did so to save their collective butts from the likes of you.
Slick ties will be treated/thought of differently. Some might speak to you, but inside are thinking something completely different. The other extreme, well... Although not on the same level, ask your scab buddies how they were regarded. You might call it internet tough guy, I call it reality. Enjoy your career.
Slick ties will be treated/thought of differently. Some might speak to you, but inside are thinking something completely different. The other extreme, well... Although not on the same level, ask your scab buddies how they were regarded. You might call it internet tough guy, I call it reality. Enjoy your career.
03-15-2014 | 06:08 AM
#154
Guest
Posts: n/a
Where would we be today without the UPA? That is the answer. 67% caved, gave up, crossed the bargaining line, cowled, voted yes because _______ ... I am certain that the breakdown of the vote would show that the UPA didn't pass on the LCAL side. Sorry, if you voted yes, you own it ... I have to live with it ... a common theme now for us ex-LCAL now UCH UAL pilots.
03-15-2014 | 06:28 AM
#155
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Another bit of hypocrisy from the LUAL side is how while you had no contractual protections to the keep a 737 base from opening in SFO, it was not opened because of the emotional impact LUAL types would have. Yet the LCAL emotional impact from us being the only group without PS is discounted as "it was not in your contract, why do you expect it."
03-15-2014 | 06:33 AM
#156
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Yep, like I said. Tough talk, but when push comes to shove you think about YOURSELF first - yet you call people that don't wear a ten cent piece of jewelry "scab-like"!!!! YOU and others with your mentality just don't get it. Every single pilot could wear the pin, but it means nothing if their ACTIONS (ie vote, holding up the contract, etc) don't back it up. Seems like lying to yourself is a popular thing amongst many of the "slick tie chest thumpers".
03-15-2014 | 06:34 AM
#157
Guest
Posts: n/a
Another bit of hypocrisy from the LUAL side is how while you had no contractual protections to the keep a 737 base from opening in SFO, it was not opened because of the emotional impact LUAL types would have. Yet the LCAL emotional impact from us being the only group without PS is discounted as "it was not in your contract, why so you expect it."
Did you have a point or was that just another LCAL rant.
03-15-2014 | 06:48 AM
#158
Guest
Posts: n/a
And you wonder why the airline community looked-down on the CAL guys. I'll rest my case with your statement.
03-15-2014 | 07:02 AM
#159
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
You are either flame baiting or completely delusional...
03-15-2014 | 07:03 AM
#160
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Hate to be bearer of the bad news but the LCAL side pushed it over the top. Those guys finally realized that JP was about to sell everybody out and joined the LUAL side(good move) to put a stop to it. Plus it gave them a contract with much better working conditions. Guess money and fame are not that important to all on you side but hey, if you want to be special, we'll give you that special treatment.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
