Delivering Friendly (16:40)
05-13-2014 | 08:54 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
Delivering Friendly (16:40)
They could have saved 3,000 hours of our collective time if Jeff had simply made a 1:40s video saying he apologizes for saying that "labor is not needed for this merger." That they cannot connect the two dots between that statement and lousy labor attitudes is really astounding. Here is a Newtonian MBA maxim: you care about your employees, they'll care about your customers. How this gets lost on the way to the top is a mystery.
05-13-2014 | 01:26 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
I don't think co-worker Jeff went to MBA school.
05-13-2014 | 01:45 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 0
A 16:40 video that's part of a mandatory training module. View it or you go non-qual. Pinning wings on a child and giving someone directions to their gate are nice things to do, but going non-qual because you didn't watch it? Why the Feds allow this kind of thing to be required when it waters down appropriate training, who knows.
05-14-2014 | 09:40 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Graduate business schools spend a tremendous amount of time talking about how to keep employees engaged and loyal. Numerous case studies of companies where employees were treated good and the companies did well, and those where employees were treated badly and the companies did poorly or failed.
I don't think co-worker Jeff went to MBA school.
I don't think co-worker Jeff went to MBA school.
From Wikipedia:
>>graduated from Princeton University, A.B. summa cum laude in economics, in 1976, and Harvard Law School, J.D. magna cum laude, in 1982<<
05-14-2014 | 11:15 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
I didn't think anyone was going to do that training after reading the last email from c-12.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
