Airline Pilot Central Forums

Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
SCOTUS decision on NLRB Recess Appointments >

SCOTUS decision on NLRB Recess Appointments

Register
FAQ
Advertising
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search

Notices

SCOTUS decision on NLRB Recess Appointments

Page 1 of 2
1
2
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2014 | 06:42 AM
  #1  
A320's Avatar
A320
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default SCOTUS decision on NLRB Recess Appointments
With today's SCOTUS decision on Recess Appointments, how will this play out with the NLRB and our contract which was settled with their help? Does anyone think our own Harvard Lawyer CEO would try to challenge the validity of our contract now with this new decision?
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 07:04 AM
  #2  
CRM114's Avatar
CRM114
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Default
I'm certain that the company agreed to the CBA independently and that there was no requirement by the NRLB for UCH to sign.
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 07:06 AM
  #3  
jsled
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default
Originally Posted by A320
With today's SCOTUS decision on Recess Appointments, how will this play out with the NLRB and our contract which was settled with their help? Does anyone think our own Harvard Lawyer CEO would try to challenge the validity of our contract now with this new decision?
Haven't seen the decision, but we (airlines) are covered by the RLA, not the NLRA. Two different Acts. While the NMB did have involvement with our contract, the NLRB did not.
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 07:21 AM
  #4  
Pkcola
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Default
Originally Posted by A320
With today's SCOTUS decision on Recess Appointments, how will this play out with the NLRB and our contract which was settled with their help? Does anyone think our own Harvard Lawyer CEO would try to challenge the validity of our contract now with this new decision?
It would interesting to see if he would try considering the heat he's currently suffering and then having the United Pilots shut the operations down for this busy travel season.

Does his Willis Tower office have a window that opens just in case he needs it?
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 07:39 AM
  #5  
Probe
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default
No windows in Willis Tower. it is a world unto themselves. No airplane pictures, models, etc. Maybe some statues of old famous bankers and robber barons?
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 08:16 AM
  #6  
pilot64golfer
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default
Originally Posted by A320
With today's SCOTUS decision on Recess Appointments, how will this play out with the NLRB and our contract which was settled with their help? Does anyone think our own Harvard Lawyer CEO would try to challenge the validity of our contract now with this new decision?
Plus its Ex Post Facto.
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 01:32 PM
  #7  
jsled
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default
Did anyone see my post? The NLRB has no jurisdiction over airlines. In fact, airlines are specifically excluded from the NLRA (and thus the NLRB). Our labor relations are governed by the Railway Labor Act and the NMB. You know, contracts that never expire, they just become "amendable". This was all covered in Airline 101 people. Know your industry. Sheez.
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 02:18 PM
  #8  
Lerxst's Avatar
Lerxst
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default
Originally Posted by jsled
Did anyone see my post? The NLRB has no jurisdiction over airlines. In fact, airlines are specifically excluded from the NLRA (and thus the NLRB). Our labor relations are governed by the Railway Labor Act and the NMB. You know, contracts that never expire, they just become "amendable". This was all covered in Airline 101 people. Know your industry. Sheez.
Prhaps had you mentioned "Bumps" at least 16 times people would've paid more attention?
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 02:49 PM
  #9  
jsled
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default
Originally Posted by Lerxst
Prhaps had you mentioned "Bumps" at least 16 times people would've paid more attention?
Bahahaha. Maybe so. I'll try that next time. Would you rather I say displacements? Like the 747s in LAX and ORD, or the 777s in SEA. Standby for the DEN displacements/bumps. They're coming around the bend, right after this last chance bid closes. Mind the bumps

Sled
Reply
0
Old 06-26-2014 | 03:01 PM
  #10  
A320's Avatar
A320
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Likes: 5
From: 787 Capt.
Default
When I heard this on the radio this morning and heard NLRB I was thinking the NMB. My mistake.
Reply
0
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Retro will hold up TA
Kayco
United
191
08-07-2022 12:19 PM
North Mississippi Flying Club vs. 9E ALPA?
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
Fed. Mediator Calls Indefinate Recess for UPS
Soyathink
Cargo
2
12-26-2005 06:06 AM
Back to Subforum
United
View Next Unread
737 Consolidation Question

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Your Privacy Choices