Search
Notices

15-01v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2014, 07:31 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

Pay banding equals fewer pilots in training, fewer pilots on the seniority list, fewer captains...
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 07:31 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,821
Default

Decision 83 based pay is the way to go.
Shrek is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 08:59 AM
  #103  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 93
Default

I'm considering going from 737 IAH (reserve, 30-50 from the bottom) to 76T EWR (I would hold a line there).

I commute from DFW either way. Am I crazy? Or is that a decent plan. Looks like I'm going to get bumped anyway.
Harrier Dude is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 09:04 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by gofastmopar View Post
I see the pay banding in a totally different light...with fewer bands there is less of a percieved need to chase metal/ training cycles to get a bump in pay... good for pilots who don't really enjoy a two month training cycle.
I.E. the "heavy bucket" of the 747/777/764/787...it is now possible to bid the one whose mission is what you prefer...
Agree. But the unintended consequence is that many pilots are going to be guppy Captains that can hold 757 Captain because of the better seniority. Wait until the 787 fence falls....
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 12:49 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek View Post
Decision 83 based pay is the way to go.
What is the formula? Does it account for lighter more efficient aircraft?
El10 is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 01:03 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer View Post
Agree. But the unintended consequence is that many pilots are going to be guppy Captains that can hold 757 Captain because of the better seniority. Wait until the 787 fence falls....
How is that a bad thing? They are using there seniority as they wish.

If the desire is more CAs then the answer is more flying, not more pilots sitting in training. Being inefficient benefits no one. We all hated bankruptcy and concessions yet like crack we keep going back for more of the drug that almost killed us the last few times.
El10 is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 02:33 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Default

Keep living in the past and not accept that we are in a new environment. We have a completely different industry now. The business has evolved and the laws have changed too. They can not make as much money now by doing a car wash bankruptcy as they can by running a profitable enterprise. They are in mode of returning value to shareholders. The only way they can do that is to be profitable. Our backstop is the profit sharring.

So back to what my point was. Do you want the company to use money to fund new flying, or to fund paying guys to go visit TK? Which method do want to use to create more Captain jobs?
El10 is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 03:07 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by Harrier Dude View Post
I'm considering going from 737 IAH (reserve, 30-50 from the bottom) to 76T EWR (I would hold a line there).

I commute from DFW either way. Am I crazy? Or is that a decent plan. Looks like I'm going to get bumped anyway.
One man's opinion and take it at that, but the pay difference between IAH 737 and 76T is small to me and quality of life commuting from DFW to EWR is terrible compared to DFW to IAH. I, for one, would vote in favor of IAH especially considering that the 737 fleet is scheduled to grow like crazy over the next few years so movement will be fast where as the opposite is true in the soon to be merged 76T and 756 fleets.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 03:08 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by Pkcola View Post
I guess most of us don't understand the effects of drugs like you do. Are you saying the employees caused either or both the merged airlines to pass through bankruptcy? As I recall, in both cases the employee groups gave or had things taken away by management groups that filled their pockets at the expense of the employees through the bankruptcy process. In some ways, it was their restructuring plan and their management style all along. NOTHING - repeat NOTHING the employee groups can do when our airlines are managed by POOR MANAGEMENT.
The same guys that claim that a "good contract" that protects our interests is "hurting the bottom line" are the same ones that brag about their ADD PAY trips and show the extra cash the company had to pay them.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 08-31-2014, 03:11 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by El10 View Post
So back to what my point was. Do you want the company to use money to fund new flying, or to fund paying guys to go visit TK? Which method do want to use to create more Captain jobs?
The company isn't going to "fund new flying" with extra cash. The cash right now is more than Smisek ever hoped to see as CEO for CAL and he is giving it all back to buy back shares so that his relative percentage of shares owned increases.

If you think that more profits = more routes and jobs you can forget about it, because it isn't happening.

And to answer your question I want every dollar possible to go to the pilots in some manner and none to management.
pilot64golfer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices