Search

Notices

15-01v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2014 | 02:03 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Seriously guys, do you realize there are people every day dying, getting life threatening diseases, losing loved ones, ect? This is just a JOB. Show up, fly the plane, enjoy the crews, then GO HOME. Put it out of your mind. Who cares whos airplanes are whos (or not)? Why is it so hard for pilots not to make everything so much harder than it is? If you just worry about doing your job to the best of your ability and let the rest happen, you will live a lot longer and be a lot happier.
I agree. Who cares who "owns" what. I know I own none of them. Nor do I care to.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 02:46 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by El Gwopo
Unfortunately, LUAL people seem to LOVE it!!! They simply don't care about all these things you say are wrong with it. They are coming to it in droves!!! Please ask them to stay where they're at.
If you hadn't tried to increase your seniority position by pegging the Guppy pay to the 757, all of these bids you're witnessing may have been different. Thank you very much.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 03:52 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
If you hadn't tried to increase your seniority position by pegging the Guppy pay to the 757, all of these bids you're witnessing may have been different. Thank you very much.
This was one of those "We are going to try this scheme. If it works, great. If not, STFB".
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 03:52 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
If you hadn't tried to increase your seniority position by pegging the Guppy pay to the 757, all of these bids you're witnessing may have been different. Thank you very much.
"I" did nothing to try to influence SLI. I go to work...then...I go home. I bet you do something similar. In fact, I did not mention SLI, pay or bids. Again, he was talking about how horrible the 73......nevermind.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 03:57 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by El Gwopo
"I" did nothing to try to influence SLI. I go to work...then...I go home. I bet you do something similar. In fact, I did not mention SLI, pay or bids. Again, he was talking about how horrible the 73......nevermind.
Your statements contradict each other. If you "don't care" as you claim, then why did you get all emotional when someone said that the guppy was a POS?

I think the guppy is a great little airplane.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 04:46 PM
  #76  
Dragon7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Pressing On
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
If you hadn't tried to increase your seniority position by pegging the Guppy pay to the 757, all of these bids you're witnessing may have been different. Thank you very much.
Serious question. Did the Bus folks try to copy that, just got lucky, or did they always make 75 pay? Because the only difference in 73 and 320 pay is as somebody pointed out slight differences in the blended rate.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 04:50 PM
  #77  
Lerxst's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
If you hadn't tried to increase your seniority position by pegging the Guppy pay to the 757, all of these bids you're witnessing may have been different. Thank you very much.
If the JointNC hadn't done so, then we all collectively would have lost out on $$ as the uber 737's were earmarked to be the successor airframe. The outcry would have been tremendous if they had allowed a replacement acft pay less as 757's went away.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 05:14 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
If the JointNC hadn't done so, then we all collectively would have lost out on $$ as the uber 737's were earmarked to be the successor airframe. The outcry would have been tremendous if they had allowed a replacement acft pay less as 757's went away.
True - that's the only reason JH signed off on it.
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 05:33 PM
  #79  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
If the JointNC hadn't done so, then we all collectively would have lost out on $$ as the uber 737's were earmarked to be the successor airframe. The outcry would have been tremendous if they had allowed a replacement acft pay less as 757's went away.
Yes, this!
Reply
Old 08-27-2014 | 05:52 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lerxst
If the JointNC hadn't done so, then we all collectively would have lost out on $$ as the uber 737's were earmarked to be the successor airframe. The outcry would have been tremendous if they had allowed a replacement acft pay less as 757's went away.
Not going to disagree that many would scream. I personally believe pay banding is concessionary and decision 83 should stand. Hard to justify a plane weighing 60k more pays the same. The 57 should pay more even by a difference of $5
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices