![]() |
Originally Posted by davessn763
(Post 1734687)
I have never been one of the chosen few, but watching a reserve fly a premium, easy, productive trip, saving the company hundreds of dollars while I fly an unproductive POS 4 day makes me want the old trip trade process back yesterday.
I have had zero success moving days off since the implementation of the seniority trip trade process. Under the old system with bad day worse day trading I could usually make a trade work. I'd gladly give the trip trade mafia back their thievery for that. Can we please go back to realtime already?? |
Remember, the current trip trade system does not work because the company does not want it to work...
|
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
(Post 1734915)
Remember, the current trip trade system does not work because the company does not want it to work...
|
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1734921)
Exactly. LUAL had real-time trip trading pre-merger. It worked great. This new CCS trip trading system is terrible.
Uh oh there goes the total BS flame bait alert. Right on cue 64! Keep that unity coming buddy. |
Originally Posted by Privateer20
(Post 1735228)
Uh oh there goes the total BS flame bait alert. Right on cue 64! Keep that unity coming buddy.
|
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1735277)
The old LUAL system was first come first served and not through CCS since we didn't have CCS. This is a new system for us.
|
Originally Posted by XHooker
(Post 1735320)
It's new to LCAL as well. It's not about CCS, it's the contract and once again we screwed ourselves. Improving the trip trade process might be at the top of my wish list on the next contract.
|
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 1735485)
Next contract...I hope we accrue more than 5 hours per month for trip trading purposes.
20-P-4-b If immediately prior to the first run of the trip-trading system the pay value of all Open Trips in a Category is less than one percent (1%) of the pay value of all Trips available for awarding in Monthly Schedule Preferencing for that Category, the Company shall allow enough Trip drops in that first run so that the pay value of those dropped Trips equal that difference (between one percent (1%) and the current Open Trips). The intent of this provision is to seed trip trading. |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1735502)
Or at least more than 1%.
20-P-4-b If immediately prior to the first run of the trip-trading system the pay value of all Open Trips in a Category is less than one percent (1%) of the pay value of all Trips available for awarding in Monthly Schedule Preferencing for that Category, the Company shall allow enough Trip drops in that first run so that the pay value of those dropped Trips equal that difference (between one percent (1%) and the current Open Trips). The intent of this provision is to seed trip trading. The 1% threshold is too low. It effectively allows for no trip dropping to repair PBS errors. |
The first step to fixing this...publish a realistic minimum # of reserves per day based on historic data. The number should be visible and no more of this "trusting" the computer that there is "no coverage".
If you make the trip trading a viable and useable system...sick time use will drop dramatically. Maybe that's the answer...they want us burning up our sick time |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands