Search
Notices

777-300ER order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:45 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped View Post
I agree. The fences have hurt the LUAL pilot side much more than the LCAL pilot side. When was the last Capt bid on the 400? I don't think I can even remember one. And now you DEFINITELY won't see one anytime soon if the 777-300ER's start arriving within the next 12 months to replace the 400's early. Bummer for us. But it is what it is.
Not really. Yes those exact seats are fenced, but when a LCAL 757 or guppy Captain upgrades to Sparky, that opens a 757 or Guppy Captain for anyone to bid. Same for all those 747 bids. Yes the direct bid sucks, and we should not have fences. I understand why they proposed it though.

The other tradeoff is that Sparky is very junior. Seniority 6,000 on the seniority list would be about 30% in any base on Sparky. Same guy on the 747 is on reserve.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 09:57 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder View Post
You mean having more pilots making the higher pay is bad?

Depending on when this 777 order comes will determine the fence issue...if they announce a 2015 to 2016 arrival then the fence will not come down until around late 2016 to early 2017...

Here's paragraph B-5 of the Arbitration Decision.

5. For a period of five (5) years beginning with the Bid Period in which the ISL is first implemented, or until the carrier takes delivery of its twenty-fifth (25th) B787 aircraft, whichever occurs sooner, no premerger Continental pilot may be awarded a Captain or First Officer vacancy on a B747 or A350 aircraft or displaced to one and no premerger United pilot may be awarded a Captain or First Officer vacancy on a B787 aircraft or displaced to one.
Maybe you've decided that any potential 777-300ER delivery will be in place of and before current 787 deliveries. If that's you're basis of claiming that fences will be extended, I have to say that's a pretty bold statement considering that there's been no official announcement of the rumored order. That's a shocking display of bravado on this forum.
awax is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:00 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
socalflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer View Post
Not really. Yes those exact seats are fenced, but when a LCAL 757 or guppy Captain upgrades to Sparky, that opens a 757 or Guppy Captain for anyone to bid. Same for all those 747 bids. Yes the direct bid sucks, and we should not have fences. I understand why they proposed it though.

The other tradeoff is that Sparky is very junior. Seniority 6,000 on the seniority list would be about 30% in any base on Sparky. Same guy on the 747 is on reserve.
Why did they propose it? Not baiting you at all, just curious as to why they proposed it...tia.
socalflyboy is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:18 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Have no idea. But, it is what it is.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:21 AM
  #45  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Are you guys really getting hot and sweaty over 10 potential wide body orders that are, for sure, replacements, and not growth, at the same pay scale?
Probe is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:23 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by socalflyboy View Post
Why did they propose it? Not baiting you at all, just curious as to why they proposed it...tia.
The idea was to keep the pilots in their base doing the same flying they were doing before. So it was really a base fence and not as much an equipment fence. It was designed to stop UAL from displacing guys in IAH and then having new bids no a new equipment or what happened in LAX where guys were forced to leave base and can't bid the same routes they had been flying for years.

The CAL guys actually proposed the 747 UAL / 787 CAL fence. That was their proposal during the rebuttal phase. It was their opportunity to change their proposal, and that was the change they asked for.

Like I said, its all done in December most likely, and I don't like that kind of flying, so I don't really care, but I know a lot of guys were uprooted because of the fences seeing more junior people doing work they used to do.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:32 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

"You mean having more pilots making the higher pay is bad? "

Pilot 64 has it right.

If one holds the theory that there is some max pay bag we can win and how it is split up is what negotiations gets to decide, then maybe kilder is almost right.

Or one can say all pilots are getting less, just some are getting more or less than others.

Oh and some keep bringing up the idea these 777s may delay the 25th order. Personally I'd rather have more 777-300ERs than 787s. No what I really want is for all international airplanes to have a decent bunk room. 787 qualifies and I know the 777-300ER can also be equipped in such a way.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:32 AM
  #48  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Yeah I think the fence is done as well. Parts and interiors are ordered way out, and UAL's 787's are probably a done deal for at least 12 months. Nobody else would use them and the interiors are already ordered and being produced.
Probe is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 10:51 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer View Post
There are 700 planes in the fleet. Only 14 of them are 787s. That's only 3% of the fleet that LUAL pilots can't fly. The 747's are only 5% of the fleet.

Fences are small potatoes, especially with the 25th delivery coming this year.
Ah it's not coming this year. Pretty sure the koolaid slide I saw was Feb 2016. Also after 25, there is over a year delay until #26. Quite simply vacancies after #25 will largely based on attrition. And recent events could very well change all of this. We shall see.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 01-21-2015, 11:28 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lerxst's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: B777 CA - SFO
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer View Post
.

The CAL guys actually proposed the 747 UAL / 787 CAL fence. That was their proposal during the rebuttal phase. It was their opportunity to change their proposal, and that was the change they asked for.
...Only in response to the UA MC designed precipitating C&R proposal, to which the Arbs made reference to in the Order and Award. We wouldn't have fences if the UA MC hadn't made their initial argument.

"Pilot career expectations are driven in important part by fleet composition dictation of available status and categories. On the basis of the foregoing facts and conclusions, we judged the widebody fences of the UAL Committee unduly complicated, inequitable and overreaching. We adopted, with some modification, the CAL Committee's more streamlined proposal to fence, for five years, B787 widebody flying for premerger CAL pilots and B747/A350 widebody flying for premerger UAL pilots."

EKN pg. 43
Lerxst is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
Major
5
10-13-2011 03:32 PM
AirbusA320
Cargo
3
08-30-2009 06:10 AM
vagabond
Foreign
1
04-12-2009 05:29 PM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices